Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out
Caret Icon BookMark Icon <
Stephanie Lundquist-Arora
January 17, 2023 - 2 minutes
facebook linkedin twitter telegram telegram
Deep Dive

Principal’s Strange Response About 8th-Grade Health Lesson

Last week, I detailed inappropriate topics in Fairfax County’s 8th grade health curriculum, including how to discuss race and parental views on dating. I emailed the middle school principal to find out why the school would ask such private questions and what they intend to do with the survey (below).

Google Docs Survey for 8th Grade Students at Irving Middle School

This is her response:

“The purpose of the lesson is to encourage students to have an open dialogue with their parents/guardians about dating and their beliefs/expectations for them as they continue to get older. The teachers are not doing anything with the responses except reviewing them in order to provide a grade. In the past the questions were printed out as a worksheet. The PE teachers use the Google format in an effort to save paper. The questions help guide a meaningful conversation at home about these important topics that impact teenagers.”  

Cynthia Conley, Principal at Irving Middle School – January 17, 2023

The survey, the “health” lesson itself, and the administrator’s response to my question are all examples of what is wrong with public education. While many districts across the country are failing at their jobs of simply educating America’s children in the basics (especially during the pandemic when schools shut their doors completely), they have further expanded their tentacles into domains that are far outside of acceptable jurisdictions.

When asked about this boundary breach, the principal doubles down. She suggests that it’s just fine for teachers to ask children about their parents’ private views (Question 13) – in a survey that she admits will be graded. She further explains that these questions, which the parents didn’t receive from the school, are somehow going to “guide a meaningful conversation at home”.

Does this mean that any topic the principal believes will “guide a meaningful conversation at home” is an acceptable survey question at school? Families can have many meaningful private conservations about a variety of controversial topics. But should the school be forcing students to provide their own opinions and their parents’ opinions to inspire dialogue?

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora
Back to Posts From HQ

More from Stephanie Lundquist-Arora

Opinion Fairfax County Public Schools’ budget crunch puts bureaucracy in focus

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the…

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora September 20, 2026
Opinion Fairfax schools’ external investigations are not independent

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the…

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora June 10, 2026
Opinion Fairfax Schools at a Crossroads: Rising Budgets, Declining Outcomes

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the…

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora May 28, 2026
Opinion Fairfax County buys a school it does not need

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the…

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora May 6, 2026
Opinion $12M and Counting: Inside Fairfax County Schools’ Legal Bills

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the…

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora April 6, 2026

Related Posts by IWN

Deep Dive April Policy Focus: Unaccountable Bureaucracy, the Civil Service, and Constitutional Government

The Trump administration is engaged in a battle to assert democratic control…

Inez Stepman April 3, 2025
Deep Dive March Policy Focus: The Role of Masculinity in Military Effectiveness and Lethality

The military’s primary function—defeating enemies—requires traditionally masculine traits like aggression, resilience, stoicism,…

Meaghan Mobbs March 12, 2025
Deep Dive February Policy Focus: Artifical Intelligence: Boundless Opportunities Require Innovative, Adaptive Public Policies

Huge historical legislative victories have occurred over the past four years, advancing…

Carrie Sheffield February 4, 2025
Deep Dive January Policy Focus: School Choice in the States

Huge historical legislative victories have occurred over the past four years, advancing…

Keri D. Ingraham January 2, 2025
Deep Dive December Policy Focus: Restoring and Expanding Tax Reforms to Empower Women and Families

Making tax rate reductions permanent will lower taxes for 80 percent of…

Carrie Sheffield December 2, 2024