Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

As a former UNC athlete, I can’t stay silent about HB 805

This article originally appeared in The Carolina Journal

A few years ago on a North Carolina high school volleyball court, Payton McNabb took a spike to the face. It wasn’t just any spike — it came from a trans-identified male competing on the opposing girls’ team. The hit left Payton with a concussion and longterm physical and cognitive issues. But perhaps the most lasting injury was the message she received from the adults in charge: that her safety was secondary to someone else’s identity.

North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein has joined a growing list of Democrat governors in rejecting basic basic biological reality and common-sense protections for women and girls. By vetoing HB 805 — a landmark bill that defines male and female in state law — Stein has chosen ideology over biology, and political posturing over public safety. The governor’s decision, cloaked in the usual fake rhetoric of empathy, ignores women’s safety, science, and the will of North Carolinians.

If not for the governor’s veto, North Carolina would have become the 18th state to define “man” and “woman” in state law.

Contrary to the governor’s misleading claims, HB 805 contained nothing radical to “stok[e] the culture wars.” Instead, the bill laid out legal backing for a basic proposition once considered apolitical: that men and women are biologically different. Polling shows this view is not extreme — it reflects not just the views of conservatives and Republicans, but those of independents and a not-small portion of Democrats. In fact, a New York Times/Ipsos poll earlier this year found that an overwhelming four out of five Americans support using this simple biological definition of sex to determine eligibility in sports.

In addition to enshrining the biological definition of sex, HB 805 would help protect the safety of students by prohibiting K-12 boys and girls from sharing the same sleeping quarters. Among other things, the bill also prevents taxpayer dollars from funding sex-trait modification procedures, puberty blockers, or cross-sex hormones for inmates.

These restrictions and protections are necessary because gender ideology activists have forced them to be so.

Payton McNabb’s injury wasn’t hypothetical; and it was entirely preventable. As a former decorated UNC Chapel Hill athlete, a two-time NCAA Champion, and now a mother to two young daughters who hope to attend school in North Carolina like their father and I did, I am appalled. Just a few years after I competed, girls are being forced to give up the very opportunities women fought so hard to secure. Why? Because too many leaders lack the courage to stand up for truth.

While he prefers to hide behind vague jabs about the “culture wars,” the sad truth is that our governor has joined too many Democrats in putting ideological extremism above basic truth, biology, and the safety of women and girls — not to mention the views of his own voters. By rejecting HB 805, the governor is prioritizing political posturing to a radical portion of his base and national activist groups over the practical needs of the people he was elected to serve.

Two years ago, the North Carolina legislature overrode a similar veto from then-Gov. Roy Cooper to protect fair competition in sports — protecting female athletes from being subjected to male competitors and teammates. They have another opportunity to do the right thing again.

Stein has chosen to let down the women and voters of North Carolina, but the legislature can still stand up — for safety, for fairness, and for the biological reality that makes protecting women’s rights possible in the first place.

Colorado leaders cheer women’s soccer while leaving girls vulnerable

Megan Burke is a two-time NCAA champion runner from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, as well as an American record holder in the distance medley relay. She also leads the Denver, CO, chapter of Independent Women’s Network. This piece originally appeared in The Rocky Mountain Voice.


Have you heard that Denver is welcoming a women’s professional soccer team and is hoping to build a new women’s soccer stadium? Wow, Colorado must be very supportive of women’s sports, right? 

Unfortunately, our leaders will try to sell you on this notion while they have done nothing in this state to protect women’s sports. 

In recent years, the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports has become a highly debated issue across the United States, and Denver is no exception. While the city champions itself as progressive and inclusive, it does nothing to protect the integrity and fairness of women’s sports. 

In the name of inclusion, we are excluding women and girls from their very own category. Colorado has passed ZERO laws to protect women’s and girls’ sports/spaces. 

In fact, not only have they not passed any, they are constantly voting against them…leaving our girls vulnerable. Vulnerable to losing a spot on the team or podium. Vulnerable to competing against men who have performance advantages due to biological factors like larger hearts, lungs, greater muscle mass, and higher testosterone levels—factors that lead to differences in speed, strength, and endurance. 

Women and girls are also more vulnerable to injury, as men are typically reported to have about 40–75% more muscle strength than women, according to the National Library of Medicine. Vulnerable to having to change in a locker room with a male, and vulnerable to not even wanting to play sports at all because of the above reasons.

According to a Gallup poll, 69% of Americans agree that men have no place in women’s sports. But just two weeks ago both of our Colorado Senators had a chance to protect Colorado girls by voting yes on the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. Both Senators voted it down. 

Senator Bennett, who has three daughters of his own, decided our daughters aren’t important enough to protect in sports. We should remind Mr. Bennett of all the wonderful things athletics bring to young women. For example, women who participate in sports tend to have a more positive body image and higher self-esteem compared to those who do not. 

And to Senator Hickenlooper, who sent me an email telling me we should be more worried about trans athletes being physically harmed, I would ask him this: what about our girls being harmed and injured from boys/men in their very own category? 

Take Payton McNabb from North Carolina, who was spiked in the face and knocked out cold, suffering permanent brain injuries caused by a male athlete playing on a girls’ high school volleyball team. That damage is done by allowing just one male into our sports.

Then there is the issue of the locker room, where our weak laws are allowing girls’ private spaces to disappear altogether. 

East High School in Denver, which educates over 2,500 students, offers a troubling example. During Christmas break, East High School changed the girls’ bathroom on the second floor to an all-gender bathroom, but the boys’ bathroom remained the same. That means a 14-year-old girl is potentially forced to share a bathroom with an 18-year-old boy in one of the biggest public schools in our state. 

Taking away young women’s private spaces is unacceptable, but with our current leaders and laws, nothing will be done to reverse this. 

Even our youth sports in Colorado are being attacked with our pro-gender affirming laws and anti-protection of women’s sports/spaces. The Colorado Rapids Soccer club, one of the largest soccer clubs in the state, notes on its website that athletes can register on the team in which they “identify.” 

Our oldest daughter played against two boys when she was only seven years old in GIRLS 7U soccer. This was not a co-ed league, either. 

So while Colorado and our politicians will take credit for this monumental occasion of getting a female soccer team and a stadium, do not forget – they have done nothing to protect the very sport category they pretend to support!

Will NC stand up for women’s sports?

As former varsity athletes at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, we know what it takes to compete.

We applaud efforts in the North Carolina legislature to support equal athletic opportunity by preserving single-sex competition for female athletes. In the world of competitive sport, single-sex categories are the only way to achieve equality for women and girls. And we implore lawmakers and Gov. Cooper to support legislation that will protect female athletes at the highest levels of competition, including college athletics, where the opportunities, the stakes, and the risks are greatest.

To some people, sports — and sex-segregated sports — may seem like a trivial matter. During a time when our country and our states face myriad challenges related to the economy, the environment, health care, crime and safety, and immigration, it may seem like sports are just a matter of recreation, not carrying the same weight as some of these other issues.

But this was not our experience as female college athletes. Sports changed our lives. Through participation in our sports at the elite level, we learned critical skills that have translated into all areas of our lives: self-discipline, confidence, teamwork, leadership, perseverance, resilience, and more. We formed bonds with our fellow women athletes deeper than words can describe.

Of course, our participation in sports also offered us the opportunity to attend a premier university on athletic scholarships, helped some of us on our way to even higher levels of competition, and served all of us in terms of resume-building and professional networking.

It is critical that lawmakers and others understand all that is at stake in women’s sports. The issue also serves as a proxy for how our culture and our laws will treat women in general: Will we recognize that women are deserving of fairness and equal opportunities in all areas of life? The position of lawmakers on the question of women’s sports sends a strong message here.

Biological-sex differences matter in sports. As tennis legend Martina Navratilova recently said, “We shouldn’t have to explain it.” The science is clear: males have larger hearts and lungs, different skeletal structures, and stronger muscles than females of the same size and weight. These differences allow males to throw farther, run and accelerate faster, punch harder, and jump higher than females.

Although the male athletic advantage arguably begins in the womb, male puberty confers a significant and lasting athletic advantage that cannot be fully erased — even with years of hormone therapy. Yes, testosterone suppression impairs male performance. But it cannot erase a biological male’s athletic advantage over females.

As female athletes, many of us sacrificed blood, sweat, and tears to shave mere fractions of a second off of our times. Being asked to compete against hormonally impaired males, who nevertheless still carry an athletic advantage, is grossly insulting and signals to young women that their bodies are not good enough.

But this is not just about fairness and female self-esteem. It’s also about equal opportunity. Because any time a biological male takes a roster spot on a women’s high school or college team, there is a female athlete who doesn’t make the team. Any time a biological male takes the field in a woman’s sport, a female athlete loses playing time. And any time a biological male receives a women’s athletic scholarship, a female athlete loses scholarship dollars.

There should, of course, be a place for trans-athletes in competitive sport. But that place is not in the women’s category, which must remain protected for the sake of equality.

By opening up women’s sports to men, the federal Department of Education and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) have failed us. Their actions not only contradict science and common sense, but they also violate Title IX, the 1972 law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, including college athletics.

While the NCAA is powerful, it does not represent the position of most Americans or most North Carolinians. Nationally, only three in 10 people say transgender athletes should be allowed in women’s sports, and 21 states have already acted to protect women’s sports as female-only. North Carolina should become the 22nd, and college sports should be included.

North Carolina has an opportunity to defend collegiate women’s sports, putting pressure on the NCAA to correct course.

Women before us fought hard for the progress we enjoyed as women athletes; we must fight to keep women’s sports fair. But who will fight for us? N.C. lawmakers, we look to you.

Megan Kaltenbach Burke
Track and Cross-Country
2-time NCAA Champion
American Record Holder

Katelyn Conlon
Track and Cross-Country

Alli Van Schaack
NCAA Field Hockey Champion

Laura Cummings
Track and Cross-Country

Cassie Link
Track and Cross-Country

Carol Henry
Track, Canadian Record Holder
NCAA Bronze Medalist
10-Time All-American

Jesse Gey Duke
NCAA Field Hockey Champion
All American
USA Olympian

Erin Dudley Kagan
Softball

Erin Donohue
Track and Cross-Country
2008 USA Olympian, 1500m

Taylor Parkes Lane
Track and Cross-Country

 

This article originally appeared on The Carolina Journal