Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Fairfax Schools at a Crossroads: Rising Budgets, Declining Outcomes

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the Washington Examiner, a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women’s Network. Her articles have also appeared in National Review, Fox News Digital, The Daily Signal and Townhall. Originally appeared on EdNews Virginia.


Fairfax County’s school board members are scheduled to vote today on the fiscal year 2027 $4.1 billion budget. Although there will be a $197 million increase in funds from last year, district leaders are still pointing to what they describe as a $28 million “budget gap,” referring to the county’s Board of Supervisors not transferring FCPS’s full requested amount. 

Rather than addressing administrative bloat, district leadership is shifting resources away from classrooms to close the so-called “budget gap.” A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that FCPS spent $272 million on salaries for 2,346 non-school-based administrators in fiscal year 2026.  Meanwhile, the district plans to reduce school reserve staffing by $8.8 million, eliminating 70 positions, which raises serious concerns. As class sizes increase in Fall 2026, some grades may require additional teachers, but reducing reserve staffing will limit flexibility to respond to enrollment shifts and will ultimately contribute to larger class sizes and reduced instructional support.

Increasing administrative spending while simultaneously cutting school-level resources and increasing class sizes raises serious concerns about fiscal priorities. And a 36% increase in the superintendent’s salary since 2019, as shown in the table below, has not coincided with improved student outcomes. In fact, since 2019, Fairfax County Public Schools’ average SAT score has declined by 35 points.  

Fiscal YearCost Per PupilTotal BudgetSuperintendent SalaryAvg. SAT Score
2019$15,293$2.9B$340,000(Brabrand)1218
2020$16,043$3.0B$350,000(Brabrand)1211
2021$16,505$3.1B$360,000(Brabrand)1201
2022$16,674$3.3B$365,000(Brabrand)1185
2023$18,772$3.5B$385,000(Reid)1181
2024$19,795$3.7B$400,000(Reid)1178
2025$20,940$3.9B$424,146(Reid)1183
2026$22,644$4.0B$445,353(Reid)N/A
2027 (Proposed)$23,722$4.1B$463,167*(Reid)N/A

*Estimated 4% increase

While the table shows a 55% rise in per-pupil spending since 2019, that growth has not been matched by measurable improvements in student academic outcomes. Overall, spending trends are increasingly out of step with performance outcomes. 

As the school board considers another multi-billion-dollar budget today, the central issue is not whether FCPS is receiving more funding, but whether those resources are being deployed in a way that directly supports classrooms and student achievement. Without an alignment between spending decisions and measurable academic outcomes, continued budget growth is becoming an exercise in scale rather than effectiveness—where more money is spent, but not in ways that improve results for students. 

The district urgently needs a comprehensive, independent, external audit of its budget.

Fairfax County buys a school it does not need

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the Washington Examiner, a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women’s Network. Her articles have also appeared in National Review, Fox News Digital, The Daily Signal and Townhall. Originally appeared on The Washington Times.


In August 2025, Fairfax County Public Schools purchased the former King Abdullah Academy in the western part of the county for $150 million. The purchase adds to a growing set of data points highlighting the district’s irresponsible leadership.

Skyview High School, the name school board members unanimously approved for the new school in February, has been in the district’s capital budget planning since 2015 to address overcrowding and expectations of an increasing student population.

Those projections, however, didn’t account for the mass exodus of students fleeing from a public school district in significant decline.

From 2015 to 2025, Fairfax County Public Schools experienced the largest decrease in student enrollment of any district in the state. It lost 6,894 students, according to the University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. From 2020 to 2025 alone, enrollment fell by 11,348 students.

The district’s enrollment is expected to decline by an additional 6.6% from 2025 to 2030, according to Weldon Cooper Center projections.

In 2015, when the county’s leaders anticipated that a new high school would be necessary, student enrollment was about 186,800. Ten years later, the district’s enrollment was 177,007 and was slated to be 165,325 in 2030.

Taxpayers are puzzled about why a new school is needed when there is a projected drop of 20,000 students from 2015 to 2030. The county’s Board of Supervisors also had questions about Skyview High School as it worked on the fiscal year 2027 budget.

Supervisor Pat Herrity, a Republican representing the Springfield district, requested that the district’s leaders “detail the proposed increase in operational expenses, including the costs that are associated with the new high school (e.g., principal salary).”

The district responded with what Mr. Herrity, in an email, called “a completely unacceptable, garbage answer that excluded many of the costs.”

District leaders wrote that the costs for fiscal year 2027 would total $4.7 million, including $3.8 million for personnel, $700,000 for utilities and $200,000 for hourly and logistics funding.

In an effort to better understand the new high school’s actual costs, I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking additional information on costs associated with building renovations, athletic facilities, parking lot modification, installation of technology infrastructure, transportation, and furniture and equipment.

The (notoriously abusive) FOIA office determined that the cost of providing a taxpayer with such information would be $455. I emailed Superintendent Michelle Reid and Division Counsel John Foster, who oversees FOIA matters, to request a more reasonable FOIA fee and greater transparency regarding the new high school.

Not surprisingly, they haven’t responded.

Although the district paid $150 million for the school and additional costs are significant — perhaps much higher than it is willing to disclose to the county’s Board of Supervisors and taxpayers — it is having trouble finding students to fill the classrooms.

District leaders planned a phased opening of Skyview High School, aiming to enroll approximately 500 freshmen and 500 sophomores for the 2026-2027 school year and reach full enrollment of about 2,000 students by the 2028-2029 school year.

The intended feeder patterns primarily included the Centreville, Chantilly and Westfield pyramids, with portions of the Oakton and South Lakes pyramids also considered in boundary scenarios. Although the initial opt-in deadline was Jan. 16, the district sent a systemwide email to all FCPS families on April 28 promoting the “opportunity” to be part of the inaugural Skyview community.

It is abundantly clear to taxpayers that Skyview High School is not as highly coveted as school board members had hoped. Whereas there was supposed to be a lottery system if more than 1,000 students applied for the school when it opened, district leaders are now desperately trying to poach students from other schools, likely to justify their unnecessary purchase.

Adding insult to injury, the county is in financial trouble because its tax revenue is declining. Waste is problematic even in times of abundance, but it is even more egregious when fiscal conditions tighten and competing demands on public funding increase.

Taken together, these decisions reflect reckless leadership. The purchase of Skyview High School, combined with declining public school enrollment and rising costs, raises serious questions about the district’s fiscal stewardship and planning discipline.

At a time when enrollment trends point downward and county revenue is under pressure, major capital commitments of this scale warrant heightened scrutiny, clearer justification and stronger accountability to taxpayers.

$12M and Counting: Inside Fairfax County Schools’ Legal Bills

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the Washington Examiner, a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women’s Network. Her articles have also appeared in National Review, Fox News Digital, The Daily Signal and Townhall. Originally appeared on EdNews Virginia.

On March 23, Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) Superintendent Michelle Reid announced that she is enlisting the services of yet another law firm, McGuireWoods, to “investigate” the district’s latest scandal — allegations that an 18-year-old illegal immigrant fondled the genitals of several female students in Fairfax High School. The district’s legal bills are mounting.

In her announcement, Reid said she retained “an independent outside law firm to conduct a comprehensive review of this matter.” The district’s contract with McGuireWoods, however — authorizing attorneys’ fees of up to $1,850 per hour — suggests a role less “independent” than described.

“McGuireWoods was retained by Client on March 19, 2026, to conduct a confidential, attorney-client privileged investigation concerning allegations of sexual harassment and/or assault of students at Fairfax High School,” the contract states. “The investigation has been undertaken for the purpose of providing legal advice to Client.”

READ THE CONTRACT (OBTAINED THROUGH FOIA):

Newly released figures reveal that even before FCPS’s contract for McGuireWoods to provide legal advice, not “conduct an independent investigation,” on the matter of alleged sexual assault in Fairfax High School took effect, February 2026 became the district’s costliest legal month on record at $3.8 million — driving total legal spending for fiscal year 2026 to more than $12 million.

Table displaying law firms and corresponding amounts paid for fiscal year 2026, showing totals and individual payments.

One firm in particular, King & Spalding, accounted for $3.1 million of the district’s legal expenses in February alone, and $7.5 million so far this fiscal year. The district’s division counsel, John Foster, signed a contract with the firm agreeing to pay attorneys up to $1,850 per hour to investigate allegations related to an abortions-related scandal at Centreville High School.

Before that “independent” investigation was completed, the district retained the same firm to represent it in a lawsuit filed by a whistleblower.

Reid’s contract to run Virginia’s largest school district began on the first day of fiscal year 2023. Since then, the district’s legal expenses have risen substantially — totaling roughly 50% more from fiscal years 2023 through 2025 than during the previous three years under her predecessor. In a district marred with scandal, and fighting the federal government for boys’ “rights” to use girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms at school, fiscal year 2026 is on track to set a new record for the highest legal expenses in the district’s history.

Table displaying total payments by fiscal year from 2020 to 2026, with a total amount of $56,030,326.

At a time when Fairfax County Public Schools is confronting repeated controversies, its reliance on costly outside legal firms has pushed spending to unprecedented levels. With fiscal year 2026 on pace to set a new record, taxpayers are left to weigh whether these escalating legal bills reflect necessary accountability — or a pattern of reactive governance, poor leadership, and efforts to obscure internal failures.

Ending income tax would give Missouri families room to breathe

Amy Hunt is a wife, mother of three boys, and a member of Independent Women’s Network. She lives in St. Charles. Originally appeared in St. Louis Post-Dispatch.


Do you ever check out at the grocery store and look at your cart thinking, “That’s it?”

This level of unaffordability is the most pressing issue for women today. We run our households, making most of the spending decisions. Over half of homes have women as de facto CFOs of the family.

Too many families are treading water and fearful of an unexpected expense. Even with pay increases now outpacing inflation, we still have years of hardship to recoup. Women who land a better job, receive a bonus, or land a promotion will feel the sting of their merit in the form of income taxes.

That disparity hits hard. But there’s hope for Missouri families who can consider eliminating state income taxes, which would unlock hundreds of dollars of their own income to curb the strain in their budgets, giving them the ability to save, invest, or just catch up.

Missouri voters face an opportunity to boost tax relief even further for all paycheck earners and make it permanent. We could join the growing number of U.S. states also phasing out their income taxes to pursue strong economic growth and attract new residents.

Earlier this month, the Missouri House of Representatives decisively passed a proposed constitutional amendment (HJR 173) to let voters decide to eliminate the state income tax by phasing it out.

The White House Council of Economic Advisors finds that Missouri workers could see average wages rise by about $2,800 per year, creating a massive financial cushion. This could also lead to a nearly 15% increase in business startups, a recipe for a thriving economy that could outpace neighboring states.

Income tax elimination is good for both tax payers and the state’s economy.

Analysis of Tax Foundation data found that non-income tax states accounted for 25% of the economic growth of the United States between 2010 and 2019. Typically, economies of states that never taxed income grew faster than those of states who had one. Conversely, states that adopted an income tax in the last six decades — including Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut — experienced slower growth than the rest of the country. Even U-Haul has identified a “discernible trend” of one-way customers moving out of high-tax states to low-tax states.

Any good constituent would ask, “But how will we pay for services?”

Currently, Missouri has a virtual flat income tax with the top rate around 4.7% on income over $9,436. The income tax comprises over half (about 60%) of the state’s general operating budget. Phasing out the income tax requires a reasonable revenue replacement plan to prevent disruptions to critical government services—such as roads, schools, and social safety net programs.

The bill under consideration would do so by expanding the sales tax and use tax base to tax more services and goods purchased in Missouri. The tax repeal won’t occur all at once though. A new revenue trigger allows the state to automatically phase out the income tax over time, with full elimination expected to happen around 2031.

While an almost foreign idea to some, state income tax elimination is actually popular with over half of Missourians. Some 52% of voters prefer sales taxes to individual income taxes to raise revenue, compared to 29% who prefer income taxes to sales taxes, according to a Saint Louis University/YouGov poll in February.

It is now our state senators who will need to heed the public support for income tax elimination and consider the good outcomes other states enjoy by passing HJR 173.

Place the final decision in the hands of voters this fall and give Missouri women more freedom to decide how best to use their household’s hard-earned dollars.

Fairfax County again scheduled to sacrifice academics for wokeness

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the Washington Examiner, a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women’s Network. Her articles have also appeared in National Review, Fox News Digital, The Daily Signal and Townhall. Originally appeared on The Washington Times.


The love of everything trans couldn’t be more visible among Fairfax County’s Democratic leadership. The district’s school board members are set to pass another transgender proclamation at their meeting this week.

In 2024, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors voted to observe Trans Visibility Day when it coincided with Easter — likely to insult Christians on their holiest of days. The alphabet people demand it every day, even Easter, apparently.

The transgender cult is arguably the most narcissistic group and certainly doesn’t need more proclamations for “visibility.” Entire months are dedicated to its pride and history. There’s a week for transgender awareness and health and days dedicated to transgender remembrance and pronouns.

Adding insult to injury, men pretending to be women have taken women’s sports, beauty pageants and awards ceremonies by storm. It’s not enough to be free to make personal choices; they demand that the public honor and applaud them for it, even when it comes at the expense of others.

Indeed, on pretty much all these “holidays,” Fairfax County’s leaders spend hours delivering soapbox speeches at public meetings about their commitment to this small, very visible group of people. The hour or two preceding community participation at the board’s upcoming meeting will be just another rerun.

In 2024, 1.9% of Fairfax students who took the Fairfax County Youth Survey identified as transgender. That was a decrease from the 2.3% the year prior, when it was trendier to be transgender. In neighboring Loudoun County’s school district this year, about 51 students (0.1%) identified as “nonbinary” (which, by the way, sounds like a body piercing from the 1990s).

While a small number of students are experimenting with claiming a transgender identity, a large number of students in both districts, particularly those from low-income families, are having an actual problem: They are failing their Standards of Learning tests.

According to data from the Virginia Department of Education, 41% of students enrolled in Fairfax County Public Schools — about 74,200 students — are labeled economically disadvantaged in the 2024-2025 academic year. Of those, 42% failed their English reading Standards of Learning tests, 95% failed English writing, 41% failed math, 46% failed science and 70% failed history.

In other words, the county’s equity warriors are focusing large amounts of resources — especially considering their expensive legal fight with the Department of Education to allow boys in girls’ bathrooms — for a few transgender-identifying students, most of whom are likely affluent.

The county’s leadership is making a clear choice, and it’s not for academics. While thousands of students, particularly those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, struggle to meet basic standards in reading, writing, math and science, the school board continues to devote time and attention to symbolic proclamations that have no measurable impact on student success.

Public schools exist to educate, not serve as platforms for political signaling. When nearly half of vulnerable students are failing core subjects, every hour spent on ceremonial resolutions is an hour not spent confronting the district’s real and growing academic challenges.

Parents are right to ask why leadership appears more focused on statements than solutions.

Until Fairfax County’s leaders refocus on improving classroom outcomes — raising test scores and supporting struggling students — their proclamations will ring hollow. Students don’t need more symbolism; they need results.

More Money, Fewer Students: Fairfax Schools’ Trust Crisis

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a contributor for IW Features, The Federalist and the Washington Examiner, a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author and the Fairfax chapter leader of the Independent Women’s Network. Her articles have also appeared in National Review, Fox News Digital, The Daily Signal and Townhall. Originally appeared on EdNews Virginia.


There has been a significant decline in enrollment in Virginia’s largest public school district. Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) experienced the largest drop in student enrollment of any district in the state from 2015 to 2025, according to the University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. While neighboring Prince William County Public Schools — the state’s second-largest district — grew by 3,970 students, FCPS saw a decrease of 6,894 students during the same period.

It’s not that the number of school-aged children in Fairfax County is declining — in fact, the opposite is true. From 2019 to 2025, the population of school-aged children increased by more than 9,000. But families with greater financial means and/or flexibility are seeking alternative educational options as concerns grow about the performance and outcomes of the district’s public schools.

As FCPS leaders request $4.1 billion in the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget, many taxpayers are also expressing frustration. Critics rightly argue that increased spending has not translated into improved student outcomes. From 2019 to 2025, average per-pupil expenditures rose by more than $6,000, while average SAT scores declined by 35 points over the same period.

Not surprisingly, FCPS stopped publishing SAT scores on its website several years ago. In response, the Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance regularly submits Freedom of Information Act requests and shares the results publicly.

Year# in FCPSFCPS Budget$ Per PupilAvg. SAT
2019187,521$3.0B$15,9981218
2020188,355$3.1B$16,4581211
2021179,748$3.4B$18,9151201
2022178,421$3.3B$18,4951185
2023180,527$3.5B$19,3871181
2024181,153$3.7B$20,4241178
2025177,007$3.9B$22,0331183

Many families in the county appear to recognize these trends and are choosing to withdraw their children from what was once considered a high-performing public school district. Consequently, the percentage of school-aged children in Fairfax County not attending public school increased from 8.6% in 2019 to 17.4% in 2025.

YearFCPS EnrollmentPrivate SchoolHomeschooledTotal Students% Not in FCPS
2019187,52114,5003,247205,2688.6%
2020188,35517,0005,912211,26710.8%
2021179,74820,0004,504204,25212.0%
2022178,42125,0003,795207,21613.9%
2023180,52728,0003,727212,25414.9%
2024181,15331,0003,749215,90216.1%
2025177,00733,4353,968214,41017.4%

Whether driven by concerns about academic outcomes, school climate, transparency, or broader policy decisions, the data suggest that public confidence in the district is eroding. If FCPS hopes to reverse its enrollment losses and rebuild trust, district leaders will need to do more than request larger budgets. 

Clear accountability, measurable academic improvement, and genuine engagement with families will be essential to restoring the district’s reputation as a destination for educational excellence. Until then, throwing more money at the problem is futile.