Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

March Was Women’s History Month, But Does Governor Hobbs Know What A Woman Is?

March was Women’s History Month, but a quick perusal through Governor Katie Hobbs’ social media shows no mention of it.

Crickets.

I can only assume she was avoiding the backlash because she knows how the majority of Arizona voters feel about matters such as Women’s History Month.

It’s for women.

So much for being the party of women’s rights. Gov. Hobbs, a female governor, made it clear this week that she refuses to stand with women and, in doing so, she refuses to stand with Arizona voters.

Gov. Hobbs had a second chance to preserve women’s rights this year, but she vetoed HB2062, Arizona’s Stand With Women Act, an act that would have codified the original meaning of basic sex-based words like ‘woman’ and ‘female’ in order to ensure that women’s rights aren’t compromised by judicial activism and bureaucrats. It would have given power back to our elected representatives to decide how, and in which contexts, it is appropriate to separate citizens by sex.

Words matter. We can’t protect women if we can’t define ‘woman.’ I have a vested interest in making sure we do. I am a mother. I have two daughters. My first granddaughter is on the way. I am president of a public K-8 charter school where young girls come to learn.

Mother, daughter, granddaughter, grandmother, aunt, sister, girls … all words that will become meaningless if we don’t fight to stop our erasure. Activists say these words lack objective meaning. They say these words are defined by subjective feelings, rather than objective reality. The efforts of these activists to legally eradicate the difference between the sexes fundamentally erase women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. Men and women are legally equal, but biologically different and as such should have a legal right to single-sex spaces. 86% of Americans (and even 83% of Democrats) agree. Gov. Hobbs is out of touch with the public and even those of her own party.

What about publicly collected data regarding males and females? Shouldn’t vital statistics—including statistics about matters such as violence against women—reflect biological truth? Imagine a world where all data used to promote public health, prevent crime, enforce civil rights laws, and ensure economic and social policy was subjective!

Most of the public focus on this issue has been on fairness in women’s sports, but this goes far beyond sports. Only two states—and not Arizona—ensure women’s prisons are only for women. In many states, men identifying as women, many of whom are violent sexual predators, have been transferred into women’s prisons. Unfortunately, many female inmates have already suffered physical and psychological damage as a result. This is why  91% of Americans, even 88% of Democrats, support single-sex prisons.

Women, including sexual assault survivors, are being told not to complain about having men undress next to them in their private spaces such as locker rooms. Men are invading female sororities, domestic violence shelters, and educational training programs that were created specifically to encourage women’s engagement.

What kind of a world are we setting up for the next generation if we close our eyes to this? My challenge to all Arizonans is this: make some serious noise and do not let up! Educate everyone you meet on what Gov. Hobbs has done to disadvantage women and take away our right to equal opportunity. Talk about this at church, at the gym, and yes, even in the workplace. I am convinced that once Arizonans understand the dangerous impact of this veto, they will have found their line in the sand and have the courage to do something about it.

Colorado leaders cheer women’s soccer while leaving girls vulnerable

Megan Burke is a two-time NCAA champion runner from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, as well as an American record holder in the distance medley relay. She also leads the Denver, CO, chapter of Independent Women’s Network. This piece originally appeared in The Rocky Mountain Voice.


Have you heard that Denver is welcoming a women’s professional soccer team and is hoping to build a new women’s soccer stadium? Wow, Colorado must be very supportive of women’s sports, right? 

Unfortunately, our leaders will try to sell you on this notion while they have done nothing in this state to protect women’s sports. 

In recent years, the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports has become a highly debated issue across the United States, and Denver is no exception. While the city champions itself as progressive and inclusive, it does nothing to protect the integrity and fairness of women’s sports. 

In the name of inclusion, we are excluding women and girls from their very own category. Colorado has passed ZERO laws to protect women’s and girls’ sports/spaces. 

In fact, not only have they not passed any, they are constantly voting against them…leaving our girls vulnerable. Vulnerable to losing a spot on the team or podium. Vulnerable to competing against men who have performance advantages due to biological factors like larger hearts, lungs, greater muscle mass, and higher testosterone levels—factors that lead to differences in speed, strength, and endurance. 

Women and girls are also more vulnerable to injury, as men are typically reported to have about 40–75% more muscle strength than women, according to the National Library of Medicine. Vulnerable to having to change in a locker room with a male, and vulnerable to not even wanting to play sports at all because of the above reasons.

According to a Gallup poll, 69% of Americans agree that men have no place in women’s sports. But just two weeks ago both of our Colorado Senators had a chance to protect Colorado girls by voting yes on the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. Both Senators voted it down. 

Senator Bennett, who has three daughters of his own, decided our daughters aren’t important enough to protect in sports. We should remind Mr. Bennett of all the wonderful things athletics bring to young women. For example, women who participate in sports tend to have a more positive body image and higher self-esteem compared to those who do not. 

And to Senator Hickenlooper, who sent me an email telling me we should be more worried about trans athletes being physically harmed, I would ask him this: what about our girls being harmed and injured from boys/men in their very own category? 

Take Payton McNabb from North Carolina, who was spiked in the face and knocked out cold, suffering permanent brain injuries caused by a male athlete playing on a girls’ high school volleyball team. That damage is done by allowing just one male into our sports.

Then there is the issue of the locker room, where our weak laws are allowing girls’ private spaces to disappear altogether. 

East High School in Denver, which educates over 2,500 students, offers a troubling example. During Christmas break, East High School changed the girls’ bathroom on the second floor to an all-gender bathroom, but the boys’ bathroom remained the same. That means a 14-year-old girl is potentially forced to share a bathroom with an 18-year-old boy in one of the biggest public schools in our state. 

Taking away young women’s private spaces is unacceptable, but with our current leaders and laws, nothing will be done to reverse this. 

Even our youth sports in Colorado are being attacked with our pro-gender affirming laws and anti-protection of women’s sports/spaces. The Colorado Rapids Soccer club, one of the largest soccer clubs in the state, notes on its website that athletes can register on the team in which they “identify.” 

Our oldest daughter played against two boys when she was only seven years old in GIRLS 7U soccer. This was not a co-ed league, either. 

So while Colorado and our politicians will take credit for this monumental occasion of getting a female soccer team and a stadium, do not forget – they have done nothing to protect the very sport category they pretend to support!

‘A Is for Abortion’: Public High School Teaches ABCs for Women’s History Month

This op-ed was written by Stephanie Lundquist-Arora, a mother in Fairfax County, an author, and a member of Independent Women’s Network. Originally appeared in The Daily Signal.


America’s public high schools are strange places to find displays of the alphabet. Perhaps with plummeting standardized test scores and a substantial increase in English-as-a-second-language students in sanctuary districts, high school educators feel the need to review kindergarten basics. In Fairfax County, Virginia’s West Springfield High School, located just 17 miles from the White House, school administrators and teachers have decorated the history hallway this month with a special, leftist rendition of the alphabet.

The display, titled “The ABCs to ME,” is decorated with the school’s colors: a blue background lined with an orange border. Featured in the display is a sign that reads, “A is for Abortion” with an image of a coat hanger with a positive pregnancy test.

(Stephanie Lundquist-Arora)

A description of the display says that it is being posted for Women’s History Month, which is March, and that “the Women’s History class in celebrating and bringing awareness to what it means to be a young woman today at West Springfield High School and in the world.”

“This is horrible even by Fairfax County Public Schools’ standards,” said a mother with a child who attends the school.

If the alphabet display ended with “A,” it would still be awful. Not surprisingly though, the activist public educators involved in decorating the taxpayer-funded school’s hallway with propaganda didn’t stop there.

Walking through the hallway, students are alerted that “H is for Hope” and, somehow, Kamala Harris is the image representing “hope” on the sign. This one is particularly confusing. I’m not sure that she ever truly represented hope for anyone, even Democrats.

The alphabet display further informs that “J is for Justice.” The accompanying image is of the Statue of Liberty holding a female sign in place of a torch, with her other fist in the air. Lady Liberty is surrounded by the Palestinian flag, Ukrainian flag, and transgender flag.

Who could argue with “L is for Leadership”? That is, until you see its associated image featuring Kamala Harris, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Michelle Obama.

In honor of Women’s History Month, the high school’s teachers and staff seem to try their best to alienate male students. To that end, “M is for Mansplain,” a derogatory term to indicate when men try to explain things to women.

“N is for NOW,” the National Organization for Women, which is such a silly name for an organization that supports males in women’s sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms.

“Q is for Queer.” The “Queer” in LGBTQ seems to be an umbrella letter to boost numbers and make more people feel as though their identity is special when they don’t think they fit under the L, G, B, or T categories. I guess in the leftist alphabet display, you can’t really make it through without throwing plenty of pork to the alphabet people.

To that end, West Springfield’s students cannot escape the notoriously liberal history corridor without noting that “T is for Trans Women.” The sign displays a transgender flag heart inside the circle of the symbol for a female.

School district policy continues to compel speech by mandating preferred pronouns in the code of conduct, despite such mandates being under investigation by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights. Fairfax County’s leaders, along with many others across the country, seem to believe their local jurisdictions are not subject to state and national laws or the Constitution.

And to cap it all off, “Z is for male gaZe,” just proving to us once again, in case the poor test scores are not enough, that leftist education is more about indoctrination.

There is simply no defense for this display, which would be expected in the Democratic Party’s National Headquarters but not in a taxpayer-funded public school. It is highly inappropriate, ideologically homogenous, and sadly, representative of our K-12 public education system. This display clearly encapsulates the pervasive rot in the public education system and the pressing need for school choice in America.

I’m a boymom. These are 5 things I teach my sons about being a man

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author, and the chapter leader of Independent Women’s Network’s virtual chapter on Effective Engagement with K-12 Schools. This piece originally appeared in Fox News.


Without fear of cancelation or professional retribution, and in the wake of the left’s attempts to shame masculinity, it’s time to have a national conversation about what it means to be a man.

In our recent collective acknowledgment of biological reality and general return to common sense, we overwhelmingly agree that men should not win the Women of the Year award, enter women’s facilities, play women’s sports, or place in women’s beauty pageants. And in case anyone ever had a doubt, men cannot menstruate or become pregnant. What men cannot and should not do is abundantly clear, which begs the question, what should they do? Here’s what I tell my three sons:

1. Do the right thing 

In May 2024, we watched the media coverage as young men from Pi Kappa Phi protected the American flag at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill when lunatics tried to desecrate it. During those moments, I explained to my sons that those were real men who were protecting the flag, representing the principles that their father, uncle, grandfather, and great-grandfathers fought to uphold. Masculine men do the right thing, including making sacrifices for their country, even when doing so is unpopular and potentially dangerous.

Elon Musk Lifts Lid on Bureaucratic ‘Sinkhole’ in Federal Government

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author, and the Fairfax chapter leader of Independent Women’s Network. This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal.


When government bureaucrats talk about efficiency, the average person’s eyes generally glaze over, but not on Feb. 11 when from the Oval Office Elon Musk reported on the new Department of Government Efficiency’s early findings of waste, fraud, and abuse. Americans and reporters across the world sat on the edge of their seats as Musk discussed an old limestone mine in Pennsylvania.

During Musk’s press briefing, as his 4-year-old son lingered next to President Donald Trump, Musk explained the antiquated retirement processing system that is illustrative of our government’s many problems.

The federal government lacks an automated system to process its workers’ retirement paperwork. The paper processing system, which is housed in a former limestone mine located 230 feet underground and is operated by more than 700 workers, takes several months to process an individual’s paperwork and only has the capacity to handle 10,000 retirements per month.

Despite all of the Democrats’ tears regarding Musk’s work and DOGE’s efforts over the last several weeks, in 2014, The Washington Post itself—basically, the Left’s platform—labeled this retirement system “a sinkhole of bureaucracy.”

Indeed. And “a sinkhole of bureaucracy” is such a fitting phrase to describe much of our government’s functions and spending. The Government Accountability Office has known this since its inception, given that its mission is to save taxpayers’ money by finding fraud, waste, and abuse. But average people outside of the Washington beltway don’t know much if anything about the GAO.

Perhaps The New York Times also is unfamiliar with the GAO. This week, the outlet published an article questioning DOGE’s claims of fraud. In a responsive memo to the press corps, the White House referred them to a GAO report from last year, which states, “No area of the federal government is immune to fraud.”

DOGE is providing transparency and proving the GAO’s assertion. The department has launched a website detailing its latest work. On Feb. 10, for example, DOGE announced that it had canceled 89 contracts worth $881 million. Among them was one worth $1.5 million for which the contractor was paid to “observe mailing and clerical operations at a mail center.”

Americans didn’t know we could collect $1.5 million for sitting around and watching people mail things. That didn’t factor into our career day presentations in grade school because it shouldn’t be a real job, particularly not one funded with taxpayers’ money.

As DOGE uncovers and exposes more of these absurdities in federal spending, Trump is sailing on high approval ratings. Meanwhile, residents in Washington, D.C., and its surrounding areas, such as Fairfax County, Virginia, and Montgomery County, Maryland, are in an absolute panic.

Many are federal employees or federal contractors. Some are understandably worried because of job security for themselves or their spouses. Others, as seen on social media platforms, are literally seeking therapy because they now have to show up for work after the president rescinded most COVID-19-era telecommuting or because they are losing promotion opportunities that previously were mostly based on them checking identity boxes.

A federal worker friend shared with me that in a return-to-work meeting at her agency, her colleague demanded a rental car from the General Services Administration because of that person’s anticipated commute. That federal worker should check in with DOGE on that request. I’d love to see the response.

While federal workers lament over their dreaded commutes, Americans outside the Beltway are applauding DOGE. They are sick of many federal workers’ sense of entitlement. It is foreign to the plumber, flight attendant, police officer, salesperson, garbage collector, restaurant worker, mechanic, house cleaner, truck driver, and many other hardworking Americans how collecting a large salary while working from home at the taxpayers’ expense is somehow a permanent entitlement. What an absolute joke.

And while most of those Americans likely were not reading GAO reports or watching congressional budget hearings in the past, they are eating popcorn and following DOGE on X. Against all odds, Trump and Musk have made the incredibly boring topic of government efficiency somehow seem sexy and exciting.

‘It Doesn’t Happen Often’ Is Not a Reasonable Defense for Men in Women’s Sports

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author, and the Fairfax chapter leader of Independent Women’s Network. This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal.


Americans are gaining ground in the fight to protect women’s sports.

This week, for example, the Department of Education sent a letter to the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Federation of State High School Associations, urging them to restore female athletes’ records. The demand comes on the heels of President Donald Trump’s executive orders to protect women’s sports and to restore biological truth to the federal government. 

Also this week, the Virginia High School League, an athletic organization governing high school athletics in Virginia, changed its policy with regard to males in women’s sports to align with President Donald Trump’s executive order.

Meanwhile, the Minnesota State High School League and the California Interscholastic Federation did not change their policies, which continue to allow males in women’s sports. Consequently, the Department of Education announced on Feb. 12 that it is launching an investigation into these two athletic organizations for Title IX violations. 

It’s about time. 

As many Americans have noted, it’s absurd that President Trump would need to issue such an obvious executive order stating that men do not belong in women’s sports. Not long ago, though, a tyrannical minority had remarkable success in compelling our speech with mandated pronouns, in allowing males to participate in women’s sports and in allowing males to roam freely in women’s bathrooms and locker rooms. Those policies remain in place in many liberal public school districts and universities across the nation.

Under the Biden administration, Americans were afraid to speak out against the transgender mob for fear of losing their jobs or being “cancelled.” We found ourselves in an unprecedented and confusing situation in which truthful statements such as “Women don’t have penises” or “Men can’t get pregnant,” were labeled by a miniscule fraction of the population as “unkind” or even “hate speech.” 

The tides have turned as people questioning the madness have found their voices through safety in numbers. Americans are collectively asking why we have been forsaking the rights, privacy, and safety of women for transgender-identifying males. It has become increasingly clear to the public, in case it was not before, that the so-called “rights” of a small group have come at the expense of another much larger group. Not surprisingly, the Left is crying foul over America’s return to commonsense regarding biological sex.

So, in response, the Left, likely noticing the public’s fatigue at its antics, has shifted its argument. Leftists say that since male participation in women’s sports doesn’t happen often, it’s not a big deal. Billy Haun, for example, the executive director of VHSL, said that from October 2020 to December 2024, 31 male students in Virginia’s high schools filed appeals to be on women’s teams and 28 were approved.

Transgender activist Shannon McKay, who is the executive director and co-founder of He She Ze and We, then argued, “It’s such a small number who want to play. So, to deny this for an entire community of people, the messaging is clear that the outside world wants them to think they don’t belong.”

The “there’s just a few so let’s allow it” logic reminds me of Vice President JD Vance’s appearance on ABC News in October 2024. During the interview with Martha Raddatz, the news correspondent had a puzzling rebuttal to Vance’s concerns about the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua crime syndicate’s activities in Aurora, Colorado. She said, “The incidents were limited to a handful of apartment complexes.”

Martha, do you hear yourself? … A few apartment complexes, no big deal,” retorted Vance sarcastically.

To McKay and all the other transgender activists pursuing the annihilation of women’s rights on similar grounds, I also say, “Do you hear yourself? Just because only a small number do it, that doesn’t make it acceptable.”

It’s time to restore female athletes’ records, protect women’s sports from male participants, keep women’s private spaces female, and fight for free speech. We mustn’t forget this shameful chapter in our nation’s history during which the government violated free speech rights and women’s rights for the sake of an extremely loud and unreasonable tyrannical minority.