Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

In 60 Seconds: H.R. 4 And Federal Pre-Clearance

*PDF Download: In 60 Seconds – Pre-Clearance

H.R. 4 requires certain states and local jurisdictions with “history of intentional voting discrimination” to obtain federal approval to make any changes to voting or election laws.

This proposal unconstitutionally threatens certain state’s abilities to dictate how they will hold elections, thereby taking the power away from voters.

Here’s the issue of Federal Pre-Clearance in 60 seconds:

What You Need To Know

The Voting Right Act:

  • prohibits election policies that deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race or color (Section 2); and
  • requires certain jurisdictions with a history of intentional voting discrimination to seek federal approval (“pre-clearance”) of any election-related changes (Section 5).

Shelby Cty. v. Holder:

  • held that Congress may not rely on 40-year-old data to justify requiring local jurisdictions to seek federal approval of changes to election-related rules.

H.R. 4:

  • establishes new criteria for determining which jurisdictions are required to pre-clear all election changes for the next ten years; and
  • requires every state and local jurisdiction in the entire country to seek federal approval before adopting certain practices, such as strong voter ID requirements.

Problems with H.R. 4

It’s an unconstitutional federal takeover

  • Pre-clearance is only constitutional if used as a temporary remedy for intentional discrimination.
  • The original pre-clearance formula was carefully calibrated to cover southern jurisdictions that used tests purposely to deny ballots to black citizens.
  • H.R. 4 widens the pre-clearance net to cover any and every jurisdiction that wants to strengthen voter ID rules or alter procedures for printing and distributing multilingual materials.

H.R. 4 is disconnected from reality

  • In 1965, intentional voting discrimination was frequent and widespread. Today, it is rare. And yet, H.R. 4 broadens and intensifies federal pre-clearnce rules.
  • Changing a polling location or failing to provide ballots in every possible language is not the same as deliberately preventing black citizens from voting.
  • Pre-clearance was supposed to be temporary. Today, the permanent prohibitions on voting discrimination provide ample remedies.

Addressing Misperceptions

In 60 Seconds: Critical Race Theory

*PDF Download: In 60 Seconds – Critical Race Theory

Critical Race Theory is an academic discipline with Marxist roots.

Instead of working to close the achievement gaps, teachers unions and many public school districts are introducing radical concepts to impressionable students—pushing divisive and damaging curricula on race, teaching kids as young as elementary school about Critical Race Theory (CRT) and “white privilege,” and even dividing them into “affinity groups” based on race.

Due to backlash by parents, many schools/teachers now claim that they are not teaching CRT or systemic racism. They instead now call it structural racism, diversity training, making sure everyone is welcome and included, the golden rule… but in most cases the content and experience are based on CRT principles.

Here’s the issue of Critical Race Theory in 60 seconds:

What It Is

Critical Race Theory (“CRT”) is an academic discipline with Marxist roots.

  • CRT is an off-shoot of Critical Legal Studies, a radical/Marxist field of study that analyzes the effect of economic power on law.
  • While Marxists view history as an ongoing class struggle, CRT views history as an eternal racial struggle.

CRT Posits That

In America, racism is the rule, not the exception;

  • American law and institutions are “illegitimate hierarchies”;
  • Equal opportunity reinforces, rather than reduces, racism;
  • Private property is a white construct

In recent years, Prof. Ibram X. Kendi has repackaged and popularized CRT under the name “Anti-Racism.” Kendi argues that:

  • Non-whites cannot be racist, all whites are racist, and denials of racism are evidence of racism.
  • One cannot be truly anti-racist without being anti-capitalist.

What’s At Stake

American Education

  • Using dishonest rhetoric about “equity” and “anti-racism,” schools across America are eliminating opportunities, such as advanced or honors courses.
  • Schools are encouraging teachers to adopt lessons on “white privilege” and to utilize “color conscious” teaching methods.
  • These lessons discourage critical thinking and chill free speech by suggesting that objectors are complicit with white supremacy.

Enlightenment Ideals and the American Constitutional Order

  • CRT claims that Enlightenment ideals such as reason, neutrality, logic, and the scientific method are racially-biased endeavors.
  • CRT regards America’s constitutional structure as a mere smokescreen for racial oppression.
  • CRT prioritizes group identity over individuality and encourages institutions to treat people differently on the basis of race.

Addressing Misperceptions

 

How to Talk About: CRITICAL RACE THEORY & ANTI-RACISM

Six Key Points About Critical Race Theory
*PDF Download

CRT is divisive. Critical Race Theory (“CRT”) prioritizes racial identity over our common...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

How to Talk About: IMMIGRATION 

How to Talk About: IMMIGRATION

*PDF Download

WHAT’S AT STAKE: 

Immigrants bring important skills, labor, and contributions to our economy and cultu...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

How to Talk About: THE WAGE GAP

Five Key Points About the Wage Gap

THE RAW WAGE GAP IS NOT A MEASURE OF EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK.

The raw wage gap is not a measure of “equal pa...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

Talking Points: The Death of George Floyd and its Aftermath

  • The racial unrest of 2020 following the death of George Floyd took a toll on police forces. The New York Police Department saw more than 5,300 uniformed officers—about 15% of its total force—either resign or file for retirement. Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Louisville, Baltimore, Raleigh, Minneapolis, and many other cities dealt with similar staffing and retention problems.
  • The 2020 increase in violence mirrors a similar 2014 phenomena. In the wake of the 2014 death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, a wave of protests targeting the police began. Between 2014 and 2016, both the number and rate of murders in the United States jumped by 23 percent.
  • According to a study of 34 U.S. cities by crime researchers of the University of Missouri-St. Louis the Council on Criminal Justice, the historic spike in murders did not begin at the height of the lockdowns in late March, April, or early May. It began after the death of George Floyd.
  • Following the death of George Floyd, in Minneapolis in 2020, citywide murders increased by 71 percent, the number of shooting victims increased by 105 percent, and carjackings increased by 301 percent
  • Through the first nine months of 2021, murders were up by another 16 percent, the number of shooting victims was up by 26 percent, and carjackings were up by 35 percent. 
  • In New York, murders and shooting incidents were up by only about 4 percent and 5 percent, respectively, through the end of April 2020. By the end of July, they were up by 30 percent and 72 percent.
  • In Chicago, murders and shootings were up by about 8 percent and 16 percent, respectively, through the first four months of 2020. By the end of July, they were up by 51 percent and 47 percent.