Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Meet the New Vanguard of the Proletariat: Trust Fund Socialists. Is Michigan Most Important Senate Race? Senator Darline Graham Throws Her Hat in Ring. Hewitt’s Iran Update. U.K. Has Another New PM. More

Here is how The Free Press characterizes the political legerdemain that is providing Maine Democrats with a senatorial candidate who is to all appearances bereft of Nazi tattoos:

The oysterman is out; a logger, Troy Jackson, is in. Platner built a powerful movement brimming with anger.

The Dems must feel their search for the elusive white working-class male has been rewarded: a logger! A supporter of Graham Platner, Jackson is the presumptive Dem nominee to challenge GOP moderate Senator Susan Collins. If anger was a criterion to succeed Graham Platner, Jackson seems to brim with it too:  

Troy Jackson, a powerful Maine legislator now running for Senate, once angrily threw a water bottle in a meeting after he couldn’t persuade a lawmaker to vote his way.

He yelled at another lawmaker, prompting her to post on social media that straight men were “too emotional” to be in politics. And he cursed and shouted in a meeting with the speaker of Maine’s state House, until she kicked him out of her office.

During the six years Jackson presided over Maine’s Senate, until he left office in 2024, his temper was a feature of his leadership, and one that Democratic lawmakers discussed among themselves as a problem and even raised with the governor.

Jackson is a progressive Democrat who advocates “Medicare for all” but—intriguingly—was formerly against abortion and same-sex marriage. He has since redeemed himself. Five things to know about Mr. Jackson. Graham Platner remains a factor. Peter Savrodnik of The Free Press writes that from immigration enforcement to the war in Gaza, the young leftists inspired by the Maine Senate candidate are still steering their party’s direction.

The Maine Senate seat is key to Dem hopes for taking the Senate. The Examiner’s Joe Concha, however, makes the case that the most important Senate race in decades is happening in Michigan. Abdul El Sayed is running against a prominent former Obama official in the Aug. 4 primary:

El Sayed has called for defunding the police in the past. He wants to dismantle Immigration and Customs Enforcement now. He believes private health insurance should cease to exist and that the government should run the entire healthcare system. 

If this were el Sayed’s platform while running in New York City or Seattle or Denver or Washington, D.C., he’d have an excellent chance of winning. But this is Michigan, a state President Donald Trump won twice and narrowly lost in 2020. It’s the perfect test case for socialism succeeding statewide in a purple state.  

Polls currently have el Sayed trailing former Obama administration official Haley Stevens by four points in the RealClearPolitics average. But he is favored to win the nomination on the betting market Kalshi by a 66% to 34% margin. Polymarket also has el Sayed as the favorite.

El Sayed has a Jill Biden feature—he calls himself a doctor but, like Jill, doesn’t have a medical license. But that’s a side issue. El Sayed has campaigned with Hasan Piker, who said that America deserved 9/11. Either El Sayed, who won Senator Elizabeth Warren’s endorsement, or Stevens will oppose Republican Mike Rogers, who narrowly lost a Senate race to Senator Elissa Slotkin in 2024, in the general election. All in the Family: El Sayed is graced with a sis who spits at cops.

What we are seeing is the “The Brave New Age of Trust-Fund Socialism,” or wealthy anticapitalists are transforming the Democratic Party, profiled in this highly recommended Free Beacon exposé. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s “working costume” seems to be fraying. What is distressing is that the rise of the socialists is being discussed primarily in terms of the midterms—not its long-range ramifications.

While Democrats search for ways to end U.S. attacks on Iran, Hugh Hewitt argues, “America is winning its battle with Iran. It’s only a matter of time.” But do the Iranians have more tolerance for pain than we do? The U.S. is taking casualties, including 100 wounded, which makes the war harder for the public to stomach, but some are daring to ask what a post-Islamic Republic would look like. President Trump will attend the dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base of the bodies of two American soldiers killed in an Iranian attack in Jordan over the weekend, 1st Lt. Tyler Feehan and Pvt. Isabella Gonzales.

Saying she wants to be “more than a caretaker,” Senator Darline Graham Nordone, appointed to fill the remainder of her brother the late Senator Lindsey Graham’s term, threw her hat into the race to succeed Graham on the Hannity show. The field already is crowded.

More Politics. “Vance vs. Rubio: The Shadow Primary” is the headline on a WSJ “Free Expression” piece by Matthew Hennessey. Hennessey writes that both men have begun putting down markers on issues like the economy, capitalism, and communism. Hennessey critiques Vice President Vance’s appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast and says that to run at all, Secretary of State Rubio would have to give up his current jobs in the administration.

Hilarity Ensued. Former CNN host Don Lemon says that people have been asking him to run for President, and he just might take them up on it. Lemon claims MAGA people are “Nazis, but Without the Holocaust Stuff.” As Townhall quips, that’s like saying someone is Catholic without the transubstantiation stuff.

The Constitution, Birthright Citizenship, and a Self-Governing Republic,” by Linda Denno, in Civitas Outlook, summarizes Trump v. Barbara. The birthright citizenship case that made it to the Supreme Court this way: “The decision in Trump v. Barbara represents a missed opportunity for the Court to reaffirm that citizenship is a fundamental aspect of national sovereignty.”

The U. S. Treasury stopped nearly $100M in taxpayer money from going to dead people after a new gov’t measure was implemented, according to a New York Post exclusive:

The department’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service discovered the money set to go to ghosts after a review of an eye-popping 885 million payments worth a total of nearly $2.7 trillion.

Since March 2025, the screening has identified more than 4,900 disbursements, worth approximately $99 million, associated with deceased payees, according to the Treasury. 

The payments going to the dead – often indicative of fraud – were returned to the originating federal agencies for review before any funds were disbursed, the department said. 

The $99 million figure is a tiny fraction (0.0036%) of the $2.7 trillion the department reviewed as part of the Trump administration’s crackdown on waste, fraud and abuse — but more than triple what Treasury discovered going to the deceased in the days before President Trump took office last year.   

“Treasury has delivered on a key promise of President Trump’s mandate to stop improper payments and fraud before money leaves the Treasury, and strengthen the integrity of the federal payment system,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. 

You’ve got to love “often indicative of fraud.”

Everybody is talking about The Odyssey, including Megan Cox Gurdon, who has a fine piece on the movie and the World Cup which have united Americans. Don’t miss Ms. Gurdon’s “Return of the Monoculture.” I don’t know if normal, everyday people are talking about Vogue magazine, but I recommend Julie Burchill’s delightfully sulphuric takedown of the “magazine’s woke makeover [that] has proven its downfall.”

I almost forgot: the U.K. has another new Prime Minister. A Telegraph podcast hails PM Andy Burnham’s “mandate.” Ouch.

Andy Burnham Is Mad for It” is the headline on Dominic Green’s WSJ “Free Expression” welcome for Mr. Burnham. I gather Mr. Burnham is mad for Manchester, where he was until recently the Mayor:

The conquering hero of Labour politics is bringing Manchesterism to London. Nobody knows for sure what that means.

Gareth Roberts, meanwhile, says that Burnham is “stuck in the 1990s.” Raising the question: How long will he be stuck at 10 Downing?

We started on socialism this morning. So why not end on it (before it ends us)? Don’t miss City Journal’s “Why Socialists Want to Shut Down Prisons.” “Far-left, extremist ideology prevents an honest interpretation of crime and incarceration data,” explains the subhead. Also, Ms. Must suggests that they might have a hard time telling good people from bad people.  

What If Iran Had a Nuke? Alec Neel Vance: First Baby Born to Sitting Veep in 150 Years. Pollster: It’s Not Socialism—It’s Distrust. Workers of World Not Uniting Behind DSA. Washington Socialites Wonder If It’s Safe Now. More

We’re back at war.

Although the Washington Post only has it that the U.S. “teeters on all-out war with Iran,” Jordan has become a new flashpoint in the conflict:

Iran has been stepping up its missile and drone attacks on U.S. forces in Jordan as it seeks to produce American casualties and deter Washington from escalating its test of wills with Tehran, current and former officials say. …

The military announced Sunday that seventeen U.S. service members have died in Iran. Three were killed in an Iranian attack on Jordan. The Pentagon has identified two of our fallen heroes who lost their lives in Iranian attacks over the weekend.  

An Iranian billboard threatens that President Trump is the “next one,” after the sudden death of Senator Lindsey Graham.

An editorial in the Wall Street Journal notes that former Trump advisor John Bolton, also targeted for death by Iran, unlike the president, does not have Secret Service protection. The Editors also address Qatar’s nifty gifty, a new Air Force One, which apparently has been put in storage because of security concerns.

The Islamic Republic with a nuke is truly a metaphysical idea.

After that, we need some happy news. Congratulations to Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha, who welcomed a new baby Sunday morning:

“We are excited to announce that our baby boy, Alec Neel Vance, was born this morning,” the couple wrote. “Usha and the baby are happy and healthy, and our kids are overjoyed to meet their little brother.”

Alec Neel, the fourth Vance child, is the first child born to a sitting Vice President in150 years. Here’s a picture of Alec Neel being held by a big brother and sister.

Vice President Vance also got another present—not as sweet as Alec Neel, of course, but nice. Bill Maher said he could see himself voting for Vance in 2028:

Maher told ABC News’s Jonathan Karl on “This Week” that the Democratic Party is being “taken over.”

Would Vance succeed Trump as MAGA chieftain? The U.K. Telegraph sees Vance “breaking ranks” in a “gamble for power” as the veep is “positioning himself” to lead MAGA.

Is Nothing off Limits? Spain defeated Argentina for the World Cup. Ms. Must can’t pretend she knows about sports, but it sounded like fun. But guess what? In New York, the World Cup final becomes a Gaza proxy war:

“Israel genocide type shit,” screamed a young Latino man on a Times Square subway platform to a group sporting Argentina jerseys. “Got a problem, eat my sack.” As dusk fell on Manhattan Spanish football fans chanted, “Free Free Palestine” to celebrate their team’s World Cup victory. The game had taken place just hours before, a few miles across the Hudson River at MetLife Stadium — or “New York New Jersey Stadium,” as it is now branded by FIFA.

In recent weeks, social media has settled on a curious narrative: Argentina as the pro-Israel team and Spain as the pro-Palestine one. …

The U.S. World Cup host cities, meanwhile, saw a surprise economic boost from the games. File this under “evils of capitalism.”

Speaking of which, we’re seeing the rise of an anticapitalist movement that seems to go from strong to stronger. Lee Carter, the pollster, suggests a counterintuitive reason. In “Why I believe collapsing trust, not ideology, is reshaping American politics“:

The real story is that millions of Americans have lost confidence in the institutions they once trusted to solve problems, create opportunity and make government work. And when confidence in institutions collapses, voters don’t necessarily move left or right. They become far more willing to embrace candidates who promise to disrupt the status quo.

Gallup’s latest polling should be a flashing warning light. Confidence in America’s institutions remains near historic lows. Congress commands the confidence of just 9% of Americans. Confidence in the criminal justice system, organized religion, higher education, big business and many other institutions Americans once relied upon has eroded dramatically over the past generation.

The trust theme is strong in Joe Abraham’s Real Clear Politics story titled “The Moral Test of Self-Government.” Mr. Abraham is the father of Katie Abraham, 20, who was killed by a drunk illegal alien behind the wheel of a vehicle. The driver had been deported previously but was back and the recipient of an Illinois state driver’s license.  

Whatever the cause of the socialist surge, Miranda Devine’s column is sobering—The headline: “Mamdani and his DSA comrades have one goal — a communist revolution in America.” Mamdani’s numerous invocations of international law against other countries have an obvious pattern—all have been directed at Israel. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani is trying to invoke “international law” against Israel, according to a City Journal piece by Eugene Kontorovich:

Just days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a major U.S. policy to “dismantle” the International Criminal Court because it threatened American sovereignty, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani mused about the possibility of arresting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the basis of an ICC warrant. …

Mamdani’s numerous invocations of international law against other countries have an obvious pattern—all have been directed at Israel. … Mamdani’s repeated comments reveal how accusations of international law violations have become a special way of speaking about the Jews, much as terms like “global elites” or “cosmopolitans” have been used before. What makes international law so powerful as a tool to talk about Jews is its esoteric nature.

Workers of the World Won’t Unite—Behind the DSA” is the headline on Rich Lowry’s latest column:

What did the country ever do to white college graduates to make them feel so disaffected from its economic and political system?

The wave of socialist victories in Democratic primaries is being driven by well-educated white voters who are more extreme than the rest of the Democratic coalition.

Lowry particularly examines the demographics of support in Michigan’s Democratic Party’s senatorial primary race between Haley Stevens, a “goofy white woman,” and Israel-hating DSA POC Abdul El-Sayed.

Much to the chagrin of the Left, an appeals court has ruled that the USPS can require states to turn over voter rolls before mailing out ballots:

That is why Democrats like Gov. Newsom object to it. They see accurate, efficient, and timely delivery of mail-in ballots as a very real threat.

While we’re mentioning California Governor Gavin Newsom, we don’t want to be sexist and exclude his wife from today’s Musts. The Washington Free Beacon has a story about her endeavors:

Documentaries produced by California’s “first partner,” Jennifer Siebel Newsom, promoting fringe views on gender have been shown to over 2.5 million K-12 students, with an accompanying lesson plan that forces teens to publicly disclose their sexual orientation to their peers and identify which of their classmates violate gender norms and may be labeled “fags,” “pussies” and “nasty butches.”

Come Out! Come Out Wherever You Are. Washington social chronicler/doyenne Sally Quinn says it’s safe now. She writes, “It’s No Longer So Much Fun to Be MAGA in Washington.” Cave Dwellers, a name for old-line Washington society, having hibernated for one of the most fascinating periods of American history, can creep out from their crepuscular existences. Or so they think. Read the piece find out what Kellyanne said to Sally!

The Week that Was. President Trump’s China Syndrome. Wheel of Fortune: Marco Up/ JD Down. For Now. DSA: the Party that Parties. What Does It Want? If You See Paul Pelosi Behind the Wheel: Run! More

With apologies to the BBC, this was the week that was.

We started the week with the sudden and shocking loss of Senator Lindsey Graham and are ending with “a new normal of increased strikes against Iran ‘to break the impasse’ over Strait of Hormuz.”

And President Trump went there. President Trump delivered a much-anticipated White House address last night. USA TODAY puckishly remarked on the president’s timing:

With 110 days to go before crucial midterm contests, President Donald Trump was naturally focused on the election in his primetime address to the nation.

The election six years ago, that is.

Joking aside, the president made the serious charge that U.S. elections are “riddled with vulnerabilities that hostile foreign actors and unauthorized immigrants are exploiting.” Axios, which is not sympathetic to the president, reports:

President Trump alleged Thursday that U.S. intelligence agencies covered up information about alleged Chinese efforts to influence the 2020 U.S. election.

The document release is likely to renew scrutiny of Trump’s claims about foreign interference in the U.S. election and the government’s past intelligence assessments.

The documents release allege that foreign adversaries — including Russia, China and Iran — were viewed as real threats to U.S. elections. Multiple released documents say large-scale manipulation of U.S. voting systems would be difficult to accomplish without detection.

The New York Times says that the documents the president presented “fall short” of proving his case. An Unherd story frames this in a different way: “As is typical of Trump’s favorite targets, the evidence of some wrongdoing is not entirely ludicrous. The scope of it, however, is what will matter to voters.”

Your response to the president’s address will likely hinge on how you feel about Trump. The New York Times sees it as “a Trump obsession that carries a cost for democracy.” For Townhall, the president last night “revealed what we all suspected about the 2020 election.” You may read the entire address here.

The speech was part of the president’s push to pass the Save America Act. A report in The Federalist that “More Than 250,000 Noncitizens Are Registered to Vote in Four States” is germane.

I think we have to say that Vice President JD, Father of the MOU, has been going through a rocky patch. “ JD Vance is wrong to blame Israel for his Iran peace deal’s failure thus far,” according to an editorial in the New York Post. Et tu: Then the Veep’s  (former?) good buddy Rod Dreher writes in The Free Press of “JD Vance’s Time for Choosing.” The subtitle: “Stab-in-the-back theories about Israel will only accelerate America’s Weimar spiral.”

As if that is not enough, Kimberley Strassel writes that “President Vance Has Gone AWOL“—Vance is President of the Senate, from which he’s absent to push his new book—and Matthew Continetti writes that “Vance has a steep climb to the White House.”

By contrast, Vance’s chief rival for the White House, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, is walking on water just now (though as you know, reversals of fortune are dizzying in our nation’s capital). Fresh from advocating the dismantling of the noxious International Criminal Court, Rubio is winning plaudits for his warning on the rise of left-wing terrorism:

For far too long our counterterrorism doctrine has had a blind spot — a blind spot when it comes to extremist violence from the political left.

Even today, the very idea that far-left terrorism could be a serious threat is treated as a right-wing fever dream, or worse, as a dangerous fascist conspiracy. It’s treated this way by many in the press, by many in academia and our universities, and by many of our legacy institutions. You will no doubt see the dogma rear its head in the coverage of this very conference.

In spite of the clear and the undeniable reality, in spite of the objective numbers and statistics, in spite of the fact that in this room today there are representatives from across the political spectrum, we will hear this organized — that this kind of organized violence and terror will be dismissed. It will be dismissed as a partisan fiction.

What DSA Wants” is the alluring headline on Examiner Chief Political Correspondent Byron York’s column:

They want to destroy the government of the United States as it was created in the Constitution. They want to destroy the U.S. capitalist economy, the most powerful in the world. And they want to destroy the way millions of Americans live their lives. The DSA’s astonishingly destructive goals are laid out clearly in the organization’s just-released 2026 national platform.

The document starts by describing a DSA “future without capitalism.” What would life be like for a person of working age in DSA world? “You enjoy your work; it’s interesting to you, and you’re well trained for it,” the platform says. “You work as much as you are able and no more than needed, and you would control your own labor and see it going to good use. It’s not just a job to pay the bills.”

But the DSA is fun. It’s the party that parties. From its hootenannies to book clubs, it attracts young people. Kendall White has been to quite a few DSA soirees:

At the new-member social, I sipped a seltzer while conversing with fellow travelers in a spacious apartment. A copy of Mao’s “Little Red Book” and a Russian fur hat with a Soviet red star sat together on a bookshelf. The communist paraphernalia was mirrored by a collection of Mamdani campaign signs on the opposite side of the room. Comrades cracked open a Riesling that retails for nearly $100 a half-bottle.

It’s not just the Riesling that’s expensive. It’s the DSA agenda that’s costly. Do they know what their fantasy programs would cost? Think of retirement in France, where pensions consume 14.1% of GDP, and are not getting any less burdensome.

New York’s Ban on the Future” in The Free Press deals with Governor Kathy Hochul’s ban on data centers, which “will hurt New Yorkers and help foreign adversaries—while stifling progress in AI.” Stu Smith, meanwhile, takes us “Inside the Rise of the Anti–Data Center Movement“:

Resistance to the facilities has become a left-wing rallying point,linking environmentalism, anti-Big Tech politics, immigration activism, Native American issues, and “anti-imperialism.”

Meanwhile, there’s resistance to scientific knowledge. In “Gender Medicine’s Regulatory Capture” in City Journal, we read about the Health Council of the Netherlands, which backed a controversial transition protocol against best evidence. The Health Council is a hotbed of conflicts of interest:

Six of the twelve members of its Advisory Committee were either directly or indirectly involved with providing endocrinological interventions to dysphoric minors. While two of these advisors lacked voting rights, they still possessed the ability to shape the nature of the conversation. The heavy representation of gender medicine practitioners on the committee, Dutch law professor Lodewijk Smeehuijzen argued, effectively amounts to asking the field’s practitioners to evaluate both their own work and that of their friends and colleagues.

Goodness! I don’t want to slight former President Joe Biden, whose memoir is imminent. It’s titled “Promise Me, America.” I can do no better than quote from Nellie Bowles’ review in her “TGIF” column:

I keep repeating the title out loud to sort of understand the tone. I guess it’s supposed to be like, promise me you’ll do good. Like a “keep your head up, kid, I’ll be watching from the sky.” But it reads more like, “America was promised to me on my Christmas list.”

Anyway, he released a video announcing the book, and it’s very sad to watch. Biden has declined further, as happens in life. The camera cuts every two seconds. His voice is slurred and hushed. Some of his longer words are barely intelligible. After 80, why even be on camera? Who is the one saying “we need him to be doing more on-camera stuff”? And why do I feel like Dr. Jill is gearing up to get him onto Dancing with the Stars?

I hope I won’t be accused of ageism because my next item is about hard-driving dude Paul Pelosi, 86. The ex-Speaker of the House’s hubby has had another mishap with his car.

Should Paul Pelosi be on the road?” the London Spectator asks:

When President Trump refers to Nancy Pelosi as “Nervous Nancy,” you might assume he’s talking about her policies or leadership style. But maybe she’s just worried about her husband’s driving.

President Trump Delivers Speech Tonight. Topic: TBA. Needed: Rogue Iranian Colonels. Half House Dems Want to Ban Israeli Aid. Blanche Hearing. Walz: Illegal Alien Rapist Was Having a Bad Day. More

Big Speech tonight. President Trump is scheduled to deliver a primetime address to the American people. We aren’t certain yet what he wants to talk about. Townhall speculates on what the promised “really big news” might be. CBS suggests the president will allege Chinese meddling in U.S. elections.

“‘Scared s–tless’: Republicans brace for Trump’s primetime speech” is the Politico headline. The subhead:

Rehashing grievances about the 2020 election could motivate the Republican base and press GOP lawmakers to pass the SAVE America Act.

Of course, if that’s the case, it might be the Dems who are scared—uh—witless. President Trump has indicated the speech will focus on “free and fair elections,” leaving us to wonder if he will return to 2020. 

Rocky day on Capitol Hill yesterday as Trump AG pick Todd Blanche was grilled by the Senate Judiciary Committee, and almost half of House Democrats voted to end aid to Israel, revealing a shift from the party’s traditional support of Israel.

Here are live moments from the Blanche hearing. Politico seems to be pulling for Senator John Cornyn, whose defeat in the GOP primary was largely the fault of President Trump, to sink the nomination. But an editorial in the Wall Street Journal suggests that a confirmed AG might be a stabilizing force:

Mr. Blanche comes across as a lawyer doing his best to deal with an impossible client, who in this case is the President. The best argument for confirming him is that a permanent Attorney General might have more stature to reject the wild ideas that are sure to come.

And Hilarity Ensued. Once again, Senator Mazie Hirono, perhaps not the brightest bulb in the chandelier, did not disappoint

Iran has a red line—U.S. targeting of (remaining) infrastructure. While preferring diplomacy, President Trump leans towards military escalation. Hugh Hewitt proposes in his “Morning Glory” column that what we need is a few rogue Iranian colonels to crack Iran’s theocratic dictatorship. Iran is already on its third-tier leadership of men, many of whom were retired and none of whom were important enough to be in the death bunker with Iran’s late Supreme Leader:

Imagine how utterly ruthless a benched and passed-over killer must be, and how many grudges he must hold against those who put him out to pasture in the first place.

It only takes a few people to crack the whole of the IRGC tyranny. Trump says to the public that he isn’t going to rush that takeover. But who knows what he and the Israelis see and hear courtesy of their intelligence communities. The allies certainly had all the information they needed on February 28. Don’t doubt that they have more and add to their collection every day.

Unfortunately, according to an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Senator Chuck Schumer’s Senate minority is “helping Iran and other adversaries by obstructing vital defense and intelligence bills.” The resumption of military action in Iran, with the consequent effect on the economy, has us wondering about the midterms. There was some good economic news about consumer prices, but will Americans feel it in time for the midterms?

Who Has the Midterm Upper Hand?” asks Karl Rove this morning. Rove notes that the party out of the White House usually gains seats but that this is not a sure thing:

These various advantages on each party won’t be totally predictive. The strengths and weaknesses of individual candidates will matter too. A Republican campaign may prevail with better strategy and strong fundraising, organization and voter targeting, or a candidate who convinces swing voters he has a vision for the economy. A Democrat may lose by being too ideologically extreme for his state or district, or because the Republican seems more authentic, approachable, hardworking and caring.

Candidates who shine in these areas can outrun their party—providing victory in races that the fundamentals suggest should be losers. Given the stakes, that’s why this midterm election is so interesting and consequential.

Captured by Socialists. Joel Kotkin explains in City Journal that cities, including Seattle, Portland, and Los Angeles, have become new political battlegrounds for a socialist resurgence:

As Tom Edsall observed recently in the New York Times, this is not a working-class movement or driven by “people of color.” Portland and Seattle are among the whitest big cities in America, and most unions, particularly outside the government sector, remain tied to the more centrist Democratic establishment.

On the same theme, “Democrats Fall for Socialism Again” is the headline on Matt Continetti’s column. Subtitle: “The party’s rage against Trump strengthens the millennial Jacobins who don’t share its interests.” Continetti runs through the policies over which socialists and average voters are at odds:

The DSA calls for demilitarizing (i.e., opening) the border, giving amnesty to every illegal immigrant, and ending immigration controls, detention and deportations. That is not meeting voters where they are—it’s running in the opposite direction.

Voters are critical of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and open to reforming it. But they haven’t abandoned immigration enforcement. In an April poll by the left-leaning Center for American Progress and Blue Rose Research, 61% of voters agreed that illegal immigration is a “big problem” and supported stronger border security. A May Harvard-Harris poll showed that 80% of registered voters, including 71% of Democrats, support deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes. Immigration was President Trump’s strongest issue.

The FBI alleges in an affidavit that drugs were found in the van involved in the Houston ICE shooting. Meanwhile, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz had a baffling response to the Trump administration’s deporting of an illegal alien convicted of raping a child whom Walz had pardoned:

“Did that make us any safer? Did that make the children that are left behind any more stable,” Walz asked – days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed that he revoked the legal status of Tou Lue Vang, a 42-year-old from Laos.

“Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by our worst day? And I want to be very clear, these are horrific crimes. They often are,” Walz added, according to KTTC.

It was an even worse day for the monster’s child victim.

What do they teach our children? Might we infer something from the tone of the special event put on by a powerful education union:

The Chicago Teacher’s Union (CTU) hosted a Marxist, virulently anti-Israel conference last weekend which openly celebrated terrorism, introduced fledgling activists to “the growing BDS movement,” and called on its members to support Iran’s “axis of resistance” and prepare for violence against the United States and Israel.

More parents are wanting to take control of their children’s education. “Tennessee’s Religious Charter School Test,” about state approval of a Christian charter school, could become the next landmark Supreme Court case on religion and public education, might interest these parents.

One More on Education: “Mom, Dad, I Want to Be a Welder” in the New York Times. … One More on Illegal Aliens: “No English, No Problem — Until the Crash Happens,” by Brian Lonergan in Chronicles, is about people who should be alive today but aren’t. … How’s Your Testosterone, Missy? A New York Times headline: “Hegseth Plans to Screen All Troops, Including Women, for Low Testosterone.” … Elegy for the Fedora: Joseph Epstein laments that the fedora has been replaced by the baseball cap:

Something is lost with the disappearance of the fedora as the masculine headwear of choice. That something is a certain formality, adultness and seriousness that the fedora conferred on its wearer. The fedora marked a distinction between boyhood and manhood; the baseball cap renders all men ageless.

And finally, is “The Odyssey” sexist? Actress Lupita Nyong’o, who appears in Christopher Nolan’s movie adaptation of the 3,000-year-old poem, says it is. In “The Odyssey Hullabaloo,” Victor Davis Hanson, our favorite classicist, writes that the ancient epic’s women tell a far different story.

Why It’s Impossible to Negotiate with Iran. A Scary Night in Mamdani-Ville! DSA’s Modest Agenda: We Don’t Need a President … or the Senate. Elites Don’t Get: Texas & Caitlin Clark. More

The Iran War is officially back on, despite President Trump’s  U-turn on his 20% toll to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Here’s an update on military actions.

Negotiations with Iran were never going to work, according to Jason Brodskey of the London Spectator:

With the reimposition of the American naval blockade against Iran, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Washington and Tehran seems dead. Its demise reveals the Islamic Republic for what it has always been: an aggressive, terroristic power that has no interest in rejoining the community of nations.

The Trump administration demonstrated with the MOU that it was willing to go big on sanctions relief for Iran. As part of its terms was a General License X that permitted Iran to sell oil using dollars for the first time in decades. The US military blockade was lifted. Discussions were beginning on the unfreezing of billions of dollars in frozen or restricted Iranian assets. The document also dangled a $300 billion investment fund for economic development and reconstruction of the country as part of a final settlement.

In “How to negotiate with Tehran,” Danielle Pletka has an interesting suggestion:

Present Iran with an MOU drafted in the United States, not Tehran or Islamabad, and explain that it is a take it or leave it offer.

In a column unpropitiously headlined “No Pain, No Gain in Iran Blockade,” the Wall Street Journal’s Holman Jenkins nevertheless says something quite encouraging: Trump’s war, according to Jenkins, has a saving grace: Its goals are in alignment with energy realism.

The New York Post cover this morning shouts, “Tear Down this Sprawl!” The sprawl consists of homeless encampments that New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani won’t let the cops clear. An editorial inside the paper orders, “Mayor Mamdani: Tear down this sprawl!” The Editors observe: 

The Department of Homeless Services estimates it will spend an astounding $97,000 per street homeless person in the next fiscal year.

If taxpayers are going to shell out that much money, we need — nay, deserve — something in return.

And that something is streets free of homeless encampments.

Unherd’s Sohrab Ahmari writes about his night spent in a “Mamdani-Ville.” Mamdani’s is responding to the encampments “very gently,” says Ahmari:

Mamdani’s response amounts to a careful threading of the needle between doing what’s necessary and keeping the activist, anti-police Left at bay. He doesn’t want a “Mamdani-Ville” mushrooming on his watch, feeding daily horror images to the tabloids. But he’s tackling it with the lowest-intensity and -visibility means possible. 

Michael Goodwin has a good column on Mamdani’s socialist policies in general and the homeless encampments in particular.

Ms. Must is getting ready to live in a socialist-run District of Columbia. The progressive City Council is getting a head start on our incoming socialist mayor by attempting to pay for “affordability” by making food deliveries more expensive, potentially harmful to elderly and disabled citizens. But onward to a socialist paradise! Speaking of which, the Democratic Socialists of America have released a new platform:

The Democratic Socialists of America launched a new platform on Tuesday night, part of which calls to “replace” the presidency and Supreme Court with “an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.”

“Whenever people are like, ‘Oh my God, they want to get rid of the president,’ I was like, ‘Well, I don’t know what we would call it in the future. We could call it the ‘head honcho’ or whatever,” Michaela Brangan, who helped draft the platform, said on a Tuesday evening webinar.

Never say nobody told you.

As you’ve probably heard, Justices Elaine Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett made a joint appearance on the Hill yesterday to ask for more security for Justices. Justice Barrett told a poignant anecdote about her 12-year-old son noticing her bulletproof vest. A Wall Street Journal editorial attributes the need for additional security to the Left’s demonization of the Court:

But the larger fault in recent years lies with Democrats. In 2020 Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) declared that Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch had “released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.) has made smearing the Justices as corrupt a personal mission. The social-media left is vitriolic and often unhinged.

It doesn’t take much for a disturbed individual to turn this into a cause to kill. This is why it will cost more to protect the Justices and their ability to rule on cases without intimidation or fear for their safety. The price for the country will be far greater if a Justice is killed.

Berkeley law prof John Yoo also says the Left’s war on the Court is responsible for the security scare.

Our Favorite Skunk at the Garden Party. “There’s Not a Money Fairy Up Here!” Senator John Kennedy responds:

“Well, I’m sorry they feel insecure. They’re not the only ones. And if I sound unsympathetic I don’t mean to, Griff. But look, I listened to part of their testimony — they want a 10% budget increase for security,” Kennedy said. “They’re like everybody else up here, their favorite kind of spending is ‘more.'”

He continued, “There’s not a money fairy up here. This money that we appropriate comes out of people’s pockets or we have to borrow it.”

Meanwhile, “whirlwind Chuckles” plans to sit out the Maine Senate race until a replacement for the Nazi tattoo guy is selected, and Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin says the SAVE America Act would make it ‘hard for any Democrat’ to win an election. Republicans accuse Slotkin of “saying the quiet part out loud.”

CNBC’s ranking of America’s 10 worst states to live in for 2026 is getting blowback. USA TODAY columnist Nicolle Russell refutes the effete snobs with a column headlined “CNBC claims Texas is miserable. Texans want to keep it that way“:

Promise me you won’t move to Texas after reading this.

No, really. I need you to promise, because some of you will want to. Shake off those feelings of freedom and affordability, gather your progressive senses and keep loathing God’s country like you’re told to, for reasons that don’t make much sense, at least not to most conservatives.

Why the warning? CNBC just ranked Texas one of “America’s 10 worst states to live in for 2026.” I can’t decide if I’m offended, surprised or relieved.

Funny thing: Texas, Florida, North Carolina and Tennessee sit at the top of the U-Haul Growth Index‘s list of states people are actually moving to.

So, CNBC gets it wrong about Texas, and Matthew Hennessey says that “The WNBA Is Mishandling Caitlin Clark.” The women’s basketball league is missing the marketing opportunity of a lifetime, argues Hennessey:

What is wrong with the WNBA?

The women’s professional basketball league has never really caught on. For decades the only thing keeping it afloat was money from the cash factory known as the NBA.

Then, suddenly, Caitlin Clark arrived. The Indiana Fever guard seemed like the savior the WNBA had been waiting for. She could help get the struggling league off life support….

Ms. Clark has what it takes to put the WNBA on the map for real . . . and for good. So why does it seem like the powers that be are trying to make sure it doesn’t happen?

Remember when you thought college was supposed to expose young people to the best that has been written and thought? Mark Bauerlein explains why this is no longer the case in “Gen Ed Is a Joke at Most Schools”:

Getting courses included in college general-education requirements is how fringe academic departments with few majors justify their existence.

Whenever people refer to The Odyssey as “a book,” Ms. Must can feel her inner pedant wanting to correct them. Instead, I submit John Miller’s delightful “How ‘The Odyssey’ Evolved“:

The epic poem popularly attributed to Homer almost certainly grew out of a much older oral tradition.

Ms. Must understands the movie has evolved further, but that’s a topic for another day.

Trump Proclaims U.S. ‘Guardian of the Strait.’ Senator Graham’s Beloved Sister Appointed to His Senate Seat. Rubio: Hey, Let’s Dismantle the ICC. The Importance of Being Ro. In Praise of the Battle-axe. And More

With the U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz to be reimposed, President Trump has given the United States a nifty new title—“guardian” of the Strait:  

“We’ll become the guardian of the strait. Maybe we’ll become the guardian angel of the strait, and we should be reimbursed for that,” he said. “When we do that we’re going to be reimbursed because the other nations are very wealthy, they’re on our side, and we can’t be expected to do that for nothing unlike we had for many years.” 

“We guarded the strait for 50 years, and we never got paid for it,” he added. “We guarded it for nothing.” 

This time, the president says, we’ll charge a service fee:

“The U.S.A… will be reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped, for any and all costs necessary to do the job of providing safety and security to ​this very volatile section of the World,” he said.

The Free Press’s Aaron MacLean says the president got it half right—MacLean supports the reimposition of the blockade, but not the toll. An editorial in the generally hawkish Wall Street Journal hopes that the president realizes the memorandum of understanding Iran signed with him was a fraud:

“The U.S.A. will be, from this point forward, known as ‘THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT,’” Mr. Trump added, “but as such, and as a matter of FAIRNESS, will be reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped.”

Bracket that last part for now, as no one knows how serious Mr. Trump is about a $15-a-barrel toll on oil exiting the Strait. It’s a bad idea, but the impulse that the U.S. should be compensated for doing what only it can in defense of Hormuz and the global economy isn’t crazy. Better ways can be found for the wealthy Gulf countries and Asian buyers of Gulf oil and gas to chip in.

Most important is Mr. Trump’s commitment to the Strait. After ducking the matter in wartime, and then trying to solve it via diplomacy only for Iran to renege, the President now declares U.S. guardianship. This was always required to “finish the job,” as he lately describes his goal.

Rich Lowry was for ending the “phony peace.” Wall Street Journal international affairs guru Walter Russell Mead contends (“The ‘Irrepressible’ U.S.-Iran Conflict“) that both sides have too much to lose to reach an agreement. Oil prices have surged. But are we being myopic? Victor Davis Hanson—sage and classicist—looks ahead in “The World Made Anew“:

Soon the Strait of Hormuz—Iran’s supposed trump card—will be nearly as irrelevant to global energy markets as it is already to the United States. …  The United States is the largest producer of oil and gas in history and does not need Middle Eastern oil or gas—or, for that matter, much of anything else besides.

Possibly Best News of the Day. “Why We’re Dismantling the International Criminal Court,” by Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the Wall Street Journal, throws down the gauntlet to an elite-created tribunal (think Amal Clooney) that seeks to override the U.S. Constitution:

Most of us would struggle to imagine a world in which U.S. soldiers, police officers, Border Patrol agents and elected leaders could be dragged before an international court, tried by judges from random countries across the globe, found guilty under international laws we neither consent to nor control, and then imprisoned thousands of miles from America.

But that is what the International Criminal Court now claims the power to do.

The ICC was born at the turn of the century. At first, it was marketed as a narrow backstop to prosecute the gravest crimes. Now the ICC and its allies seek a standing world tribunal with near-unlimited reach, empowered to override the courts and constitutions of the U.S. and other sovereign states—and to prosecute and arrest our citizens.

Americans never agreed to any of this.

Marco-ed Man. The Left, meanwhile, appears to regard Rubio as the most dangerous threat to the socialist project. 

South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster appointed the late Senator Lindsey Graham’s sister Darline Graham Nordone to fill her brother’s seat for the rest of his term. It was an undeniably sweet moment as Graham brought up his little sister after their parents died. National Review’s Jeffrey Blehar says that, between Graham and Senator Mitch McConnell, we must prepare for a changing of the guard. Never forget: Lindsey Graham’s finest hour.

Not His Finish Hour. What a Free Press headline bills as “Ro Khanna’s Dishonest Israel Stunt” didn’t come off as the camera-friendly Congressman must have hoped. TFP’s sub-head:

The California lawmaker turned a brief West Bank confrontation into a national controversy—and revealed how Israel has become a stage for the Democratic Party’s next political fight.

An editorial in the New York Post calls Khanna’s West Bank “hostage stunt” a “new low for a total phony”:

Rep. Ro Khanna’s latest showboating stunt is too much even for other Democratic electeds — not only a transparent ploy to get past his all-in bet on the Graham Platner campaign, but a transparently pathetic bid to play victim of those darn Israelis.

Just days after his scorched-earth defense of the Maine Senate candidate failed to stop the implosion, Khanna (D-Calif.) rushed off to the Middle East to change his storyline.

He headed to the West Bank, intentionally directing his entourage into a restricted zone, then pretended he’d been taken hostage by Israeli “settlers” run amok.

In reality, he was briefly stopped by local security; after the army checked out his story he was free to proceed on his inane “fact-finding” mission.

The Federalist’s fun headline is “Ro Khanna Is Very Important, Explains Ro Khanna“:

Brace yourself, because Khanna explained that Israel had made a major mistake by crossing a very important man: “Free advice to the Israelis: It’s not a good idea to detain long-shot presidential candidates,” he told the Times.

Let’s get serious again. Corey DeAngelis has an excellent op-ed in the Washington Post (have you noticed the vast improvement in the WaPo’s opinion pages?) headlined “School choice for me, but not for thee.” Senators, who routinely pick private schools for their own kids, prevent other parents from choosing.

May I use this to revert to the late Lindsey Graham for a moment? Unlike many people who come to Congress from humble beginnings and then rival Croesus for gilt-edged investments, Graham died with very modest wealth. It was the portfolio of an intelligent average guy. Somehow, I can’t get over this modesty and probity in a high place.  

A “trans” activist expressed the hope that the murder of Ann Widdecombe, outspoken conservative, former Member of Parliament, Brexit-backer, Strictly Come Dancing alum, and Catholic convert, was “extremely painful.” U.K. counter-terrorism officials have been called in to investigate the murder.

In an obituary at Unherd, Mary Harrington celebrates Ann Widdecombe as “Britain’s last Battleaxe.” What a glorious and enviable accolade “battleaxe” is! A snippet to inspire you:

If she’d been losing out since the war, the British Battleaxe was eclipsed by the death of Diana. As a public figure, she held on in the Tories in the person of Ann Widdecombe, until David Cameron — the man who arguably Dianafied the Tories — forced her disgusted departure, with her calling him “big-headed” and “dismissive of everything that had gone before”. After this, Widdecombe stood more or less alone: the last British Battleaxe in a world grown simpering, sentimental, and mandatorily progressive.

In keeping with her status as the People’s Battleaxe, as well as conviction politician, her murder has prompted an outpouring of memories. Friends and sparring-partners alike all recall her as funny, warm, and courteous even to those with whom she disagreed. This is all in keeping with the culture of pre-Diana Britain: one that saw public service as a duty, and private life and conscience as inviolably private. But this outlook has grown less common. Especially among 21st-century progressives, it has come to seem just as self-evident that private conscience ought always to conform to public duty, while the presence of any boundary between the two is cause for suspicion.

Please, God, make me a battle-axe.