Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Excellent Jobs Report. Flight of the Billionaires. Trump Foreign Policy Called ‘Churchillian.’ Not Feeling Churchillian Today: Keir Starmer Susie Wiles Honored at NOT the Met Gala. More

News Flash: April wasn’t the cruelest month after all.

Not by a long shot. “Hiring Defied Expectations in April, with 115,000 New Jobs” is a Wall Street Journal headline this morning. Here’s the 411:

The U.S. economy added far more jobs than expected in April, buoyed by strong corporate earnings and businesses that are shrugging off the supply-chain shocks of the Iran war.

The U.S. added 115,000 jobs in April, the Labor Department said Friday, far exceeding expectations.

That compared with a net gain of 185,000 in March. It was better than the 55,000 jobs that analysts polled by The Wall Street Journal had expected to see for April.

Remember the Rule: Any good economic news reported when a Republican is in the White House must “exceed expectations” and be “unexpected.” 

Meanwhile, the flight of billionaires from blue states and municipalities to red areas on the map proceeds apace. 

It’s the topic of Kimberley Strassel’s column today in the Wall Street Journal. Perhaps we are reaching a clarifying moment:

There’s a silver lining in the clouds that produce today’s political storms. It is the growing, obvious disparity between red-state and blue-state economic models, which puts their theories to a real-world test. One side is doing all the winning.

This was beautifully illustrated this week via the amusingly unequal battle between New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Citadel CEO (and Florida resident) Ken Griffin. Mr. Mamdani provoked it by using a malicious, personal attack to promote his pied-à-terre tax. In a video, the mayor complained that “rich” owners of second homes in his city don’t pay their fair share, pointing to “this penthouse, which hedge-fund CEO Ken Griffin bought for $238 million.” …

The obvious success of one model and the obvious failure of another is documented with every one-way U-Haul rental.

And it conjures in the mind a future Mamdani video. One in which the mayor is still raving about injustice—but nobody is left in New York to hear him. …

The New York Post has a story this morning about New York leaders desperately trying to stop billionaire bigs from fleeing the city over Mamdani. Blue states have lost $2 trillion in wealth to red states over the last decade. Joel Kotkin (here) addresses the public policies based on elite virtue signaling that have led to the ruin of the erstwhile Golden State. A New York Post editorial exhorts, “Don’t give up on NYC, Ken Griffin — expose the idiocy of Mamdani’s socialism.” But the voters of New York were well-informed about Mamdani’s socialism, and they gave him the job anyway. Douglas Murray writes about the economic consequences for everybody of billionaire flight.

Meanwhile, New York Governor Kathy Hochul is engaged in a budget standoff with public unions. Hochul and other NY pols are described as “deferential” to the public unions. Looking on the bright-ish side: “New York’s Teachers’ Unions Are So Progressive, They’re Even Alienating Teachers.”

No Iran deal update yet. “Round one of Iran fight went to the US military. But ending things is much harder” is the headline on a Fox Digital opinion piece by Lt. Col. (ret) Robert Maginnis. Niall Ferguson writes about “the Iran stalemate” at The Free Press. Taking the long view, Michael Barone reflects on President Trump’s “Churchillian Foreign Policy.”

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is probably not feeling very Churchillian today (of course, Labor PMs aren’t supposed to feel Churchillian). Sir Keir is “fighting for political survival” after Nigel’s Reform obliterated Labor in local elections. An ouch Telegraph headline: “Starmer must agree to orderly exit, say Labour MPs.”

In election news closer to home, a California county has found 600 unopened ballots in a successful Gavin Newsom-backed redistricting measure, former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey is appalled that a former associate of the “Blind Sheik” is running for Congress, and WSJ opinion editors spot a fallacy in Dem rhetoric on Tennessee redistricting:

Democrats say the GOP is erasing black representation because the safe Democratic seat being dismantled is majority-black. Except the Memphis seat is held by Rep. Steve Cohen, who is white, and who told CNN that Memphis was “never a VRA [Voting Rights Act] case,” but a compact district that “happened to be majority African-American.”

Will Wonders Never Cease? I recommend three worthy opinion pieces in the formerly knee-jerk lib Washington Post: Senator John Fetterman on why he won’t switch parties (“I haven’t changed. Here’s what has”), David “Scion of the Establishment” Ignatius on “an American industrial revolution brewing in Pittsburgh,” and “You can earn a billion dollars,” by the editorial board. Since billionaires seem to be a theme this morning, here’s a snippet:

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) doesn’t just think there should be no billionaires. She believes accumulating that much wealth is inherently immoral, probably criminal and definitely illegitimate.

“You can’t earn a billion dollars,” the socialist congresswoman said in a podcast interview with comedian Ilana Glazer published Thursday. “You just can’t earn that.”

Read why AOC got it wrong. Again.

“Medicine without Merit,” by Forrest Bohler, in Compact magazine, isn’t going to make you feel reassured the next time you see a new doctor. Bohler describes the travails of getting into medical school and attending medical school, and what kinds of applicants are accepted:

When I arrived at medical school, it became clear that admissions were only the beginning. The same ideological framework that governed entry into the system shaped the culture inside it. Orientation included an entire day devoted to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). We were asked, and even pressed, to publicly recount moments of discrimination from our lives. The exercise assumed a shared framework of identity and victimhood. At one point, a student asked the DEI instructor to explain the meaning of “demisexual,” which was written next to the “Gender Unicorn” they were teaching us about. After a long pause, the instructor admitted she didn’t know how to define it.

Ms. Must went out on the town last night—Independent Women’s star-studded gala at the DC Waldorf Astoria.

It was sort of our NOT the Met Gala. Instead of “empty celebrities” in outre outfits, Independent Women’s event was filled with well-turned-out, serious men and women who want to make the world a better place. Brisk and beautiful.

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles was our Woman of Valor, presented with the Barbara K. Olsen Award by Heather Higgins. The DC Examiner has a glowing report (there is a glitch you’ll immediately spot that anyone who’s ever written on a tight deadline will overlook). Victor Davis Hanson was given the Lifetime Achievement Award (we like men, too, as Heather Higgins noted), and he offered a beautiful tribute to his mother. It was perfect for the lead-up to Mother’s Day, and I hope Independent Women makes it available.

A good time was had by all, even if Ms. Must is very sluggish this morning.  

Is a Deal Nigh? What’s Iran’s Endgame? Mamdani to Titans of Industry: Drop Dead. Or Just Go Away. FBI Raids Legislators’ Cannabis Shops. Butchery: Serkis’ Adaptation of ‘Animal Farm.’ And More

As news of a potential deal with Iran emerges, several influential voices seem to be echoing Margaret Thatcher’s fabled advice to a previous leader of the free world: Don’t go wobbly.

President Trump is eager to get a deal to extricate the U.S. in time to help his party in the midterms (a perfectly legitimate goal). “Tehran would love to keep it vague, then drag out the implementation,” warns a Wall Street Journal editorial on a possible deal. The editors write:

President Trump abruptly paused Project Freedom in the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday night, citing progress in nuclear talks. Now the Iranians are reviewing a U.S. framework, which if accepted would lead to 30-day negotiations on a detailed agreement. …

The attacks on Iran’s nuclear program have already made the proposed terms more effective than those of the 2015 deal. The strikes also suggest a willingness to attack again, which is the true deterrent. Still, this regime thrives on delay and ambiguity. Key details have to be spelled out, even in the initial framework.

On Wednesday Iran’s state media criticized the U.S. offer, and a senior U.S. official told us the regime is still likely to resist U.S. red lines. It will be essential for Mr. Trump to hold firm, knowing that Iran has no need for domestic enrichment other than for a bomb, and that he can’t count on a change in regime behavior over time, a mistake Mr. Obama made.

Meanwhile, Hugh Hewitt recalls that there have been rumors of deals before, but this time it seems more likely. Hewitt doesn’t like the reported details of the deal, however:

That would be a terrible “deal,” one that would draw fierce criticism from the GOP’s Iran hawks who want President Trump to “finish the job” and do so in dramatic fashion.

The “end game” doesn’t have to be humiliation of the remnants of the rump regime atop the ruins of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps atop the shattered Iranian “government.” But they are “lunatics” as both President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have called them — “insane in the head” Rubio added Tuesday from the White House press podium — and that’s generous.

The “leaders” left standing in Iran (the ones with the guns at least) are fanatical killers who cannot be trusted…. Special Envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner don’t want their names on a “second Munich agreement,” and they have walked away before. President Trump should not want to risk the victory he has won that is one for the ages by letting Iran off the floor.

Israeli journalist Amit Segal, writing at The Free Press, says the deal would save Iran’s regime: “An Israeli official says the economic noose tightening on Tehran can force a change in government, unless a settlement is reached with America.”

Mister Market likes what he sees. This Just In: Feeling the pinch, China, which has suffered from the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, is ordering corporations to ignore U.S. sanctions against Iran.

Not Going Wobbly. New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani isn’t wasting time in achieving his goal of driving billionaires out of his nascent socialist paradise. The cover of the New York Post, always an early stop on Ms. Must’s daily quest for truth, reports that “titans” are moving as Mamdani “vilifies” Wall Street. “We Are Zo Out of Here!” the headline declares. Hedge fund titan Ken Griffin is scaling back his job-creating ventures in New York in response to Mamdani’s “antics”:

“We will add far more jobs in Miami over the next decade as an immediate and direct consequence of the mayor’s poor decision here with respect to his posting of that video,” Griffin said.

“Investors and job creators have options and they will go where they’re treated well. Increasingly New York City has treated them inhospitably. New York City leaders have assumed they can’t do business elsewhere, even though we have seen in the last several years a dramatic expansion of the financial sector’s activities in states like Florida and Texas.”

You might recall Mayor Mamdani’s standing in front of Griffin’s Manhattan residence and calling out Griffin by name, which arguably is not a safe thing to do. Griffin had choice words for Mamdani’s stunt. An editorial at the Washington Post highlights Mamdani’s “creepy” and “weird” antics. Meanwhile, an opinion piece at the New York Post says that New York’s education officials are waging war on parents.

But goodness gracious—let’s give credit where credit is due. Mayor Mamdani isn’t the only politician doing his bit to drive the very rich, not to oblivion, but to Texas or Miami. In “Northwest Blues,” City Journal’s Steve Malanga argues, “Oregon and Washington were two of the most popular U.S. destinations before the tax man arrived.” Meanwhile, in Seattle, home to Mayor Katie “Bye” Wilson, a City Council member demands “a black budget,” alongside the regular city budget.

The FBI has raided the office and cannabis business of a top Virginia state legislator. She’s Louise Lucas, an ally of Governor Spangberg and an advocate for the currently in limbo redistricting plan. I had no idea who she was, but National Review enlightens me:

While details surrounding the ongoing federal investigation remain unclear, this is not the first time that Lucas’s business dealings and ties to the cannabis industry have faced scrutiny. Local outlets have previously reported that Lucas’s cannabis shop has sold mislabeled products containing illegal levels of controlled substances, such as the intoxicant delta-9 THC. A 2022 report in the Virginia Mercury noted that Lucas’s business practices were “typical of the black and gray market for retail marijuana that has exploded in Virginia since lawmakers legalized possession of the drug but not sales.”

Some Pig. Andy Serkis has made a new animated adaptation of “Animal Farm,” George Orwell’s classic 1945 novel about the perils of communism, especially the Soviet Union. Writing in The Free Press, Nicholas Clairmont spots some problems:

In the film, we experience events through the eyes of a pig character named Lucky, who doesn’t appear in the book. In an opening scene, as the animals break out of a slaughterhouse truck, it becomes clear that their revolution is not ultimately against Farmer Jones, as in the original text. Rather, it’s against a bank to which Jones owes unpaid mortgage payments. 

Uh oh.

We seem to be reading quite a bit about the closings of various colleges, including Hampshire College, the alma mater of documentarian Ken Burns. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Roland Fryer has a counterintuitive take on the closures:

Is it just me, or is this good news for America? Closing these institutions means students are slowly ceasing to overpay for scant added value. If more market correction is to come, that tells us something important—about higher education and about other education sectors we have built to avoid correction altogether. The question isn’t how to save these institutions. It is how to accelerate market forces.

The private-college sector didn’t rise in a laissez-faire market. It was built by federal loan programs, the postwar college wage premium and decades of expanding demand. In that environment, “more college seats” and “more social value” came to mean the same thing. They weren’t.

Must Be Noted: Benign tumor vs. malignant Nazi tattoo. Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins acknowledges a medical condition.  … Karl Rove throws cold water on Trump triumphs in Indiana. … Elections lawyer Cleta Mitchell says that it’s about time the DOJ investigates Fulton County ballots. … Joe Klein celebrates the late Ted Turner as “the Optimist Who Built CNN.”

Trump Gets Good News from Hoosiers. Project Freedom Paused. How Do You Solve a Problem Like Ketanji? Soave: Stop the (Medicaid) Steal! Pulitzers. Empty Celebs. And More

Secretary of State Marco Rubio reaped praise for a polished presidential tryout yesterday in the press briefing room, proving himself “a man of many parts.” Rubio’s boss received some good news too. USA TODAY’s Susan Page reports:

He’s still the boss.

President Donald Trump is beset by rising gas prices, falling approval ratings and an unpopular war in Iran. But in the Indiana primary May 5 he demonstrated his continued grip on the Republican Party by delivering a thumping to a half-dozen state senators who defied his demands to redraw congressional lines.

Of seven GOP senators who earned his ire, five lost their party’s nominations to challengers the president had endorsed, with one race still too close to call.

A Wall Street Journal headline announces that “Trump’s hold on the Republican base” held firm. Aside from the presidential pummeling of rebellious Hoosiers, Vivek Ramaswamy got the nod from Ohio Republicans in his bid to be Governor. Doesn’t the Trump-endorsed entrepreneur seem to have been running for governor forever? More on yesterday’s election results.

That’s not the only good news for the president. “Oil Plunge Quickens on Mideast Optimism” is a Wall Street Journal headline. The president has paused Project Freedom (escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz). Pakistan’s Prime Minister praises the pause, cites “progress” towards a deal with whoever is running Iran these days. Hmmmm…

Among former President Joe Biden’s gifts to the republic are the appointment of two DEI women to positions of prominence. One, Kamala Harris is subject to the will of the voters. Not so Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Jackson is forever (or for life). Justice Jackson has emerged as possibly the most outspoken member of the Court—and not in a good way. George Washington law professor and Fox Contributor Jonathan Turley writes about Justice Jackson’s latest foray, legal eccentric and insult (her dissent in an order finalizing the Court’s ruling in the Louisiana gerrymandering case):

Since her appointment by President Joe Biden, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has quickly developed a radical and chilling jurisprudence. Her often sole dissents and accusatory rhetoric have drawn not just the ire of her conservative colleagues but her liberal colleagues. This week, that tension deepened with a stinging rebuke from Justice Samuel Alito (joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch).

… it was Justice Jackson’s language again that drew the attention of her colleagues.

Justice Jackson lambasted the court’s ruling “has spawned chaos in the State of Louisiana.” In an Orwellian twist, Jackson suggested that others were playing politics as she sought to effectively protect unconstitutional Democratic districts. She suggested that the case exposed “a strong political undercurrent.”

In a post headlined “Alito vs. Jackson,” Powerline characterized Justice Jackson’s dissent as “vituperative” and “impugning” the motives of her colleagues. An editorial in the Wall Street Journal took note of Justice Alito’s “intriguing footnote” in the Louisiana case:

The footnote suggests some pique by Justice Alito about the Court’s long gestation on Callais, and understandably so since Justice Jackson is accusing the majority of playing politics.

With apologies to Rogers and Hammerstein, How Do You Solve a problem like Ketanji?

Unlike Justice Jackson, Jason Riley of the Wall Street Journal says, “Good Riddance to Racial Gerrymandering“:

Under segregation, black Americans generally shared a common experience of being second-class citizens. That’s no longer the case, but the supporters of segregated voting districts and racial preferences in hiring and college admissions would have us believe that nothing has really changed. Racial-gerrymandering advocates today assume that black voters are essentially fungible and share identical political preferences. That’s not only false but insulting, and this Supreme Court corrective couldn’t come soon enough.

We now know the name of the suspect in the 2025 fires that ravaged Los Angeles County. The suspect is not somebody who accidentally forgot Smoky Bear’s injunction to snuff out campfires. Jonathan Rinderknecht, 30, the alleged firebug, is a full-fledged anti-capitalist admirer of CEO murder suspect Luigi Mangione. National Review’s Noah Rothman places Rinderknecht firmly in the elite Left’s tradition of espousing the destruction of other people’s property: 

“Destroying property, which can be replaced, is not violence,” wrote Nikole Hannah-Jones, the author of the New York Times’ 1619 Project. “To use the same language to describe those two things is not moral.” The New Yorker editor David Remnick agreed. “We don’t have time to finger-wag at protesters about property,” he wrote of the big-box and mom-and-pop stores alike that were put to the torch. “That can be rebuilt. Target will reopen.” Sure, “looting is counterproductive,” NPR CEO Katherine Maher conceded. “But it’s hard to be mad about protests not prioritizing the private property of a system of oppression founded on treating people’s ancestors as private property.”

Then there’s other people’s money. The New York Post cover features New York Governor Kathy Hochul squeezing the Statue of Liberty for more taxes. “Hochul STILL pushes more taxes and a $260 B budget” is the caption. Meanwhile, in Washington state, voters will have no say on a referendum on a new 9.9% levy. Billionaire Ken Griffin says that New York under Mayor Mamdani doesn’t welcome success, so he might take some of his money elsewhere.

Welfare fraud has cost voters untold billions of dollars, but some blue-state leaders are closing ranks … to protect the fraudsters, according to the New York Post. Reason’s Robby Soave observes at The Hill that Medicaid fraud in Ohio is almost exclusively from the Somali community, but that both parties have turned a blind eye to it. He has a radical (in a good way) solution:

Here’s what I’m calling for: Since politicians aren’t going to do anything about fraud, can we get an AI on this? Maybe Claude, or ChatGPT? Let’s ask the computer where the fraud is and how we can get the money back, or at least shut off the fraudsters’ access to it. We need to restore faith in this system and end the stealing.  

Meanwhile, an editorial at the Washington Examiner proposes that Trump’s food stamp reforms are working. Apparently, it was the work requirement that did it.

The Pulitzer Prize winners were announced earlier this week. Or, as Powerline has it, “The Pulitzers Strike Again.” The New York Times, according to Ira Stoll at the Washington Free Beacon, “is scrambling to defend the integrity of its Gaza-based photographer and his work, which won a Pulitzer Prize on Monday, after a press watchdog organization accused him of ‘staged scenes’ that were closely coordinated with the Hamas terrorist organization.”

Stoll sums up the winning entries:

The prizes largely honored articles that bashed Trump—his alleged abuses of power, his destruction of the federal workforce, his venality—or Israel.

“The Economic Lesson from Weight-Loss Drugs,” by David Goldhill, at City Journal, reveals that selling directly to consumers makes health care more affordable:

Why are GLP-1s getting cheaper while health care remains expensive? The answer lies in what makes GLP-1 drugs different: actual consumers have to pay actual prices.

Writing at The Free Press, Ruy Teixeira tells us, “How the Far Left Tapped into a Money Machine.” It’s radical candidates such as Graham Platner, who is running for the Senate against incumbent GOP Senator Susan Collins, who attract the biggest Democratic donors. Teixeira explains how this happened.

Just Indulge Me. Please. Matthew Gadsa of Unherd put his finger on what so bothered me so much about the Met Gala:

At the heart of the Met Gala is a deep cynicism. It takes a premise with which it is hard to disagree — a world-class museum needs more money — and manages to turn the resulting attention and money on the world’s most banal people. All the while, this obscures the immense handicraft of the designers themselves and the larger cultural significance of the Met as an institution. The event further reifies the hold that celebrity has over the American psyche, while conflating fashion as craft or art with fashion as spectacle.

… The Diana Vreeland-era of the Gala during the Seventies and Eighties was at least worthy of envy: tasteful, aristocratic, and actually interested in the museum’s collections and exhibitions. It was a gatekept event, but it wasn’t a circus.

Iran Shooting at Ships. What They Wore to Met Gala. Smith Faces Title IX Probe. Hewitt: Can Dems Do ‘Extremist Makeover’ for Nazi Tattoo Guy? How Chic Is Hasan Piker? Very! More

The fragile Iran cease-fire is broken. At least, that’s the gist of a Wall Street Journal editorial. The ball is in President Trump’s court, according to the editors, who have repeatedly voiced support for the Iran war:

President Trump now faces a decision about how he plans to reopen the Strait of Hormuz: Give Iran’s regime what it wants in negotiations or use the U.S. military to get ships through. …

Mr. Trump wields the military advantage, and he can use it to pry open Hormuz and strike to shorten the timeline to those oil-well shut-ins. The Iranians have fired the first shots to end the cease-fire, which is all the reason Mr. Trump needs to use the force to stop them from getting away with it again.

Iran’s Foreign Minister warns the U.S. of being dragged back into a “quagmire,” using a word that frightens Americans far more than “Death to America” chants. The United Arab Emirates is “actively engaging” ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones fired by Iran, while the U.S. guides ships through the Strait of Hormuz, despite Iranian fire. Stock futures were up a bit early in the morning.

Ah, yes—and now for the beauty and creativity of the Met Gala to afford a contrast with the bleakness of war—except that the gala was, as usual, weird. To paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald, the people who attend the Met Gala are different from you and me.

Here, and here, and here photo spreads on the evening. You can see Bad Bunny got up as an old man with a cane (I don’t get it, do you?) and Beyoncé as a bejeweled skeleton.

The Met Gala was underwritten this year by Jeff and Lauren Sanchez Bezos (who came as John Singer Sargent’s voluptuous Madame X). Mr. Bezos must have seen the $10 million price tag as a nice way to make his socially ambiguous wife happy and a cheap penance for firing egregiously entitled Washington Post hacks. Bottles of fake urine were hidden at the Gala to protest Bezos’ mercy killings at the newspaper.

And now for another milestone in the decline of civilization. “The New York Times’s Latte Logic of Social Collapse,” by the great Heather Mac Donald, at City Journal. Ms. Mac Donald writes about the infamous New York Times coffee klatch featuring Hasan Piker and other luminaries of decadence:

Three days before a 31-year-old male stormed the White House Correspondents Dinner, hoping to assassinate President Donald Trump and members of his cabinet, the New York Times published a 35-minute video titled: “‘The Rich Don’t Play by the Rules. So Why Should I?’ Why petty theft might be the new political protest.” In it, a Times editor interviewed two other members of the media aristocracy about the moral code shared by a large swathe of young Americans.

That code justifies theft—and even violence—when harnessed to a fashionably left-wing cause. None of the participants—podcasting celebrity Hasan Piker, New Yorker writer Jia Tolentino, and Times opinion editor Nadja Spiegelman—expressed alarm at the glorification of crime. They smirked and giggled through the discussion, betraying a breezy indifference to lawbreaking.

The video’s most memorable feature is the visual contrast between the participants’ studied downtown chic and their professed identification with what Piker calls the “masses.” 

For the New York Times gathering, Piker, as they might have put it last night, was in Ralph (Lauren). Chubby Ms. Spiegelman wore only her New York Times affiliation, which was more fashionable than Mr. Piker’s Adidas, possibly made by Asian slave labor.

As long as we’re thinking about civilizational decline, how about the federal judge who issued an apology to Cole Allen, the suspect in the latest presidential assassination attempt? “Whatever you’ve been through, I apologize for the prior week,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui told Allen. What a sorry federal judge.

Something good for civilization? Walter Russell Mead writes about the serious mistakes that Russian President Vladimir Putin has made, including with the Ukraine war, and which could bring him down. Unfortunately, this isn’t an entirely feel-good story:

Russia’s wily president shouldn’t be written off. Whatever one thinks of his morals, Mr. Putin has frequently demonstrated uncanny daring and skill. But unless he can summon the energy and creativity to extricate himself from this predicament, he may be remembered by history as the leader on whose watch Russia’s standing as a serious great power was finally and fatally lost.

Maine Senator Susan Collins has a history of always pulling out a win, no matter the tough competition. Hugh Hewitt asserts that the Dems have handed Collins an advantage for 2028 in the person of Bernie-backed, Nazi-tattooed oysterman, Graham Platner:

Platner is not a “liberal.” He’s not a “leftist.” He’s an extremist. Platner is from that land “beyond the fringe” in American politics that occasionally throws up onto the election beaches a candidate from the wacky left or wacky right after an intra-party primary campaign, a nominee who simply doesn’t play within the “10s,” much less the “40s,” of American political football.

The extremists luck out in the primary for a variety of oddball reasons, and then their parties pretend to be surprised when their oddball nominees get thumped in the general election.

Townhall has a Platner story that contains a delightfully droll X post by Mary Katherine Ham:

I think if one is trying to figure out if a candidate is sympathetic to Nazis, one of the most important tests is whether the candidate knowingly got a death’s head tattoo signifying an elite, brutal group of SS officers and kept it until the second he wanted to run for Senate and someone noticed. It’s an insult to everyone’s intelligence to suggest otherwise. Sorry, his Medicare thoughts from last week are not permanent body art or absolution.

That’s Pratt, not Platner: “Spencer Pratt is running for mayor. Can he save LA?” columnist Nicole Russell asks at USA TODAY:

Two things define Los Angeles today: endless sunshine and the consequences of failed leftist governance….

That is why I’m glad to see Republican-turned-independent Spencer Pratt, 42, former star of reality television’s “The Hills,” entering the Los Angeles mayoral race. On April 29, Pratt released a sharp campaign ad that, in just 30 seconds, highlighted the widening gap between Democratic governance and the daily realities many Angelenos face.

All-women’s Smith College has been hit with a Title IX investigation, as National Review reports:

Smith College, one of the largest all-female colleges in the United States, is facing a Title IX investigation from the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights after the college admitted biological male students, granting them access to women-only spaces.

Men admitted to the school were able to access dormitories, bathrooms, locker rooms, and athletic teams, according to the DOE.

After a momentary confusion, Ms. Must got it: The “women” being admitted identify as “trans women.” The tip-off is “biological male,” a redundancy that is code for guys who claim and/or believe they are women. Says a DOE official:

“An all-women’s college loses all meaning if it is admitting biological males,” Kimberly Richey, the assistant secretary for civil rights, said in a news release.

The Wall Street Journal’s Bill McGurn writes about “Trump’s War With the Pope.” Interesting piece that explores what the Pope, an Augustinian friar, might think of Just War Theory, formulated in its initial stages by St. Augustine. McGurn writes:

The Catholic Church, moreover, claims its teachings are true for everyone, not just Catholics. If, however, Rome wishes its teachings to be so, then it should help people to understand exactly what it’s saying. This is central to one thing the papacy is supposed to offer the world: clarity about the church’s message.

It’s hard to miss that Rubio’s profile is rising. “Marco Rubio’s 2028 momentum is getting impossible to ignore,” according to the Examiner’s Joe Concha. What does that mean for Veep Vance? Read Concha.

May I Take My AI Lover to Next Year’s Met Gala? “How should we think about people having ‘relationships’ with chatbots?” asks City Journal.

Seattle’s Clueless Socialist Mayor Says ‘Bye’ to Tax Base. Epic Brilliance of ‘Drill, Baby, Drill.’ Why Dems Should Be Nice to Fetterman. Another Dead Kimmel Joke. More

Seattle’s socialist Mayor Katie Wilson says that reports that the rich are fleeing Seattle’s high taxes are “super overblown,” but even if so, Wilson has a super dismissive message for them: “Bye.”

Wilson was “slammed” for her “wave to tax weary residents” (also known as the tax base) of Seattle. In her self-satisfied remarks, which evoked approving titters from the audience, Wilson “waved good-bye to prosperity,” according to a devastating editorial in the Washington Post. 

The editors noted that Seattle’s most iconic business, Starbucks, already had fled after being targeted by Wilson:

Nine days after winning Seattle’s November mayoral election, Katie Wilson joined Starbucks baristas on a picket line and pledged to boycott the coffee conglomerate until their union got its way. The socialist will need to wait a while longer for her caffeine fix.

In March, after Wilson took office, the chain said it would close five additional stores in Seattle, including four that had unionized. Starbucks said they were selected because of poor financial performance and bad customer experiences.

Then, last week, Starbucks announced it will establish a new corporate hub in Nashville, investing $100 million and bringing up to 2,000 jobs.

The 43-year-old Wilson, who received a $10,000 allowance from her parents last year, is defiant about the consequences of her antagonism toward successful people who create value for society.

The Washington Post goes on to note that such arrogance is increasingly typical of the state’s elites. More details on Wilson’s background. On the drive to eliminate those annoying rich people, another Washington Post editorial (I’m telling you—the WaPo’s editorial pages are getting better by the day) says that California stands to lose revenue if the 5% billionaire tax goes into effect. 

Meanwhile, the other famous socialist Mayor, New York’s Zohran Mamdani, was elected on the false promise that he would “immediately” freeze rent on rent-controlled apartments for four years—easier said than done:

Since taking office, however, he has been forced to recognize what the law has made clear from the start: He cannot set rents himself, and overt interference with the independent RGB could expose a rent freeze to a legal challenge.

So Mamdani has found another way.

His Office of Mass Engagement will soon recruit so-called volunteers to fan out across selected neighborhoods and encourage rent-stabilized tenants to attend the hearings.

In other words, City Hall is mobilizing the constituency most likely to support the mayor’s preferred outcome while insisting it is merely promoting civic participation.

He’s paying lip service to the RGB’s independence while directing a government office to organize a campaign ensuring the board “answers to the people it serves” — an ominous phrase that gives away Organize NYC’s actual purpose.

The mayor insists the effort aims to educate, not advocate. According to Mass Engagement Commissioner and DSA veteran Tascha Van Auken, the volunteers are “not advocating for any specific outcome or position.”

Don’t be fooled. …

Not an Escort Service. In an arm’s-length effort to unblock the vital supply waterway that doesn’t involve escorts by U.S. warships, President Trump says the U.S. will “guide” stranded ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. denies Iran’s claim to have hit a warship in the Strait. Is the blockade the U.S. strategy that finally makes a difference? A news story in the Wall Street Journal suggests as much:

For almost five decades, Iran’s Islamic government has survived financial pressure from the U.S. by selling oil to China. It confronted American military might with guerrilla tactics. But with the U.S. Navy’s blockade, that strategy might have met its match, analysts said.

Epic Brilliance. According to Rich Lowry, Operation Epic Fury is highlighting the utter brilliance of “Drill, baby, drill”:

“Drill, baby, drill” is arguably the most successful public policy of the last 20 years.

On top of sweeping innovations forged by private industry, President Donald Trump has driven a stake through the heart of Joe Biden’s “net zero” energy policy — based the delusion that we could phase out fossil fuels — and has pursued US “energy dominance” instead.

The Western hemisphere stands to gain from the Iran crisis, as the closure of the Strait of Hormuz underlines the inherent risks of reliance on Middle Eastern suppliers. 

Meanwhile, an editorial in the Wall Street Journal explains how Russia helps Iran by providing intel to help target Americans:

President Trump is clear-eyed about the threat from Iran, but he seems to view Russia with Kremlin-colored glasses. Perhaps he needs an intelligence briefing on the extent of Russian aid for Iran. Vladimir Putin hosted Iran’s foreign minister in St. Petersburg recently, and evidence is accumulating that the Kremlin has been helping Iran with intelligence to target Americans.

While trying to shoo off rich people—who provide tax revenue—our friends on the left welcome illegal aliens, who too often don’t stop doing illegal things just because they are here. The New York Post cover today features an illegal alien who butchered two Long Island women. The newspaper reports:

An illegal migrant on Long Island fatally butchered a beloved mom of three and another woman in separate savage attacks — before calling cops and calmly confessing he “killed somebody,’’ police said.

Rony Yahir Alvarenga Rivera, 22, of El Salvador — who entered the US as an unaccompanied 12-year-old in 2016 — knifed a 42-year-old coworker and mom to death at an Island Park Wendy’s around 12:30 a.m. Friday, authorities said.

Three hours earlier, around 9 p.m. Thursday, Rivera had hacked his 32-year-old roommate to death at their Valley Stream apartment, according to Nassau County police.The tragic woman was identified by cops as Eddy Raquel Hernandez Castillo.

Rivera later went to his job at Wendy’s and killed de Aguila, cops said.

Advocates of illegal immigration are particularly sympathetic to unaccompanied minors such as Rivera. California Governor Gavin Newsom, in particular, has been on an illegal alien funding spree. 

“Hasan Piker is left’s Nick Fuentes. Why do they embrace him?” is the headline on an Ingrid Jaques column at USA TODAY. Good question:

The New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg has called Fuentes, a 27-year-old online influencer, a “Hitler-loving white nationalist.” The Times has run ominous headlines like “Nick Fuentes’s Rise Puts MAGA Movement in a ‘Time of Choosing’ ” and “Nick Fuentes: A White Nationalist Problem for the Right.”

Meanwhile, the news media largely ignores the rise of a similarly repugnant force on the left: Hasan Piker. Piker, 34, has more than 3 million followers and streams hours of political content each day on Twitch.

Piker is an anti-Zionist, capitalist-hating Marxist who appears far too comfortable with political violence, so long as it serves the “right” cause.

Piker’s growing popularity among progressives has coincided with a broader and deeply disturbing rise in left-wing tolerance for political violence.

In a Politico story headlined “Inside the Quiet Republican Effort to Flip Fetterman,” Jonathan Martin raises a chilling specter: What if the maverick Democrat from Pennsylvania did switch? The Dems could help themselves by listening to Fetterman, but that is a bridge too far. Another rich guy: Andy Kessler of the Wall Street Journal says, “We’re going to miss Tim Cook,” the Apple CEO who is retiring. And an editorial at the same esteemed outlet on the end of Spirit Airlines starts this way:

The demise of Spirit Airlines is a tragedy for its 15,000 or so employees, though at least taxpayers weren’t forced to pay for a bailout. But the airline’s closure shouldn’t pass without giving dubious credit to the main culprits: The antitrust theorists of the Biden Administration.

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, NOT a socialist but known as “America’s Mayor for his stewardship of the city after 9/11, is in critical but stable condition in a Florida hospital. The increasingly ghoulish Jimmy Kimmel made an ill-timed quip about Giuliani, 81, “calling [him] from the grave.” President Trump weighed in, decrying “radical left lunatics” for their treatment of Giuliani. Thoughts and prayers for the former Mayor.

Voting Rights Act Was NOT Gutted. King Charles Goes to NYC. Where He Meets The Jerk. Loons, Bulwarks & Busting Myths about High-Earning Women. More

Oh, ye consumers of MSM, relax.

No, yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling striking down a Louisiana congressional district did not destroy the last pillar of the historic 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Yes, dissenting Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson certainly gave that impression. Ditto the legacy media. They should all calm down. A Wall Street Journal editorial headlined “A Victory for Voting Rights at the Supreme Court” gives a less febrile interpretation of the ruling:

To hear the critics tell it, the Supreme Court on Wednesday gutted the 1965 Voting Rights Act and made it harder for racial minorities to vote. It did no such thing. A 6-3 majority in Louisiana v. Callais took a large step toward ending the partisan abuse of race to carve up Congressional districts in a way that violates the Constitution.

The VRA still protects voting rights, and its Section 2 can still enforce that law against attempts to restrict black voting with poll taxes and other obstacles. The Court struck down the distortion of the VRA to use race to draw Congressional districts in ways that amount to proportional representation. It’s a much-needed ruling, even if the Court’s reasoning was more complicated than it needed to be. ….

The Voting Rights Act was a landmark of American liberty that helped to break Jim Crow. But that storied purpose has been twisted over the years by both parties to justify the use of race to gerrymander. The Justices are restoring the VRA’s original purpose.

Far from gutting the VRA, Edward Blum, president of the Project on Fair Representation and founder of Students for Fair Admissions, argues the Court provided much-needed clarification:

The justices held that Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act doesn’t require states to draw election districts to achieve racial proportionality. More important, the court reoriented voting-rights law toward its original constitutional purpose—preventing intentional racial discrimination. No longer will black and Hispanic voters be harvested out of multiracial neighborhoods and communities to create race-based districts….

For decades, voting-rights litigation drifted toward a dangerous assumption: that if election outcomes didn’t roughly mirror racial census percentages, something must be legally wrong. Courts and advocacy groups increasingly treated proportional representation as a requirement. States were pressured to sort citizens by race and draw majority-minority districts to hit demographic targets.

The majority opinion was written by Justice Sam Alito, the subject of Mollie Hemingway’s new, bestselling book. In other Supreme Court news, the Justices ruled 9-0 in favor of pro-life pregnancy centers:

Another culture war, and another unanimous Supreme Court decision, this time freeing pro-life pregnancy centers from a First Amendment purgatory. While the win in First Choice v. Davenport is about access to justice, not the merits, it’s still significant, including as evidence that the Court is doing law, not politics.

An editorial in the Washington Post (can’t get over how much the WaPo editorial pages are improved) praises the ruling as a win for privacy. Just a plug: I heard Mollie speak yesterday and was so engrossed in the book on the way home that I missed my bus stop. It’s really good.

After taking Washington by storm, King Charles III and Queen Camilla moved on to New York, where they encountered the Jerk. Who is also known as Zohrab Mamdani, and who took the opportunity to demand that the King surrender a crown jewel. Mamdani behaved like a petulant teen in front of the King and Queen:

Mayor Mamdani had just one job: don’t be a jerk.

Instead, the mayor first tried to ignore the King’s visit. Mamdani knew he couldn’t skip the 9/11 appearance — but he omitted the purpose. On his press schedule, Mamdani’s staffers noted only that the mayor would “attend the 9/11 Memorial wreath-laying ceremony” — no mention that the point of the ceremony was so that the King could offer condolences.

Then, hours beforehand, asked by a reporter what he might say to Charles, the mayor purposefully unwelcomed the King. “I’ll be attending a wreath-laying alongside a number of other elected officials,” he said. “The focus of that wreath-laying is to honor the more than 3,000 New Yorkers who were killed.”

As for New York’s baby king bringing up the Koh-i-Noor Diamond, the New York Post goes on to ask who appointed Mamdani representative of the government of India. (The 106-carat diamond came from an Indian mine. More on the diamond.) Mayor Mamdani has also been busy pushing new taxes as his budget crisis spirals out of control.

Moving right along from jerks to loons. It’s Senator John Kennedy who designates what he calls the “anti-ICE, pro-Karen” wing of the Democratic Party as loons. Kennedy says it’s this segment of the Dems that has shut down the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for 70 days. He writes:

The loon wing of the Democratic Party — the folks who think Dr. Seuss is racist, Mr. Potato Head is sexist and children can change their genders at recess — is the largest and loudest segment of the Democratic Party. They hate our immigration laws. They want criminal illegal aliens to roam free while ICE officers rot in jail. And they have made it clear to every Democrat in office that a vote to fund ICE would haunt them for the rest of their natural lives.

Senator Kennedy expresses delight that the GOP agreed to turn to reconciliation to fund ICE and Border Control, without Dem help. Indeed, after five hours of fighting, the Republicans passed a framework for funding ICE. The GOP is still looking at challenging midterms. Karl Rove advises in his politics column that Republicans go on the offensive. “Attack!” says Rove. This Just In: The U.S. economy grew by 2% in the first quarter:

The U.S. economy entered the year on a steady, albeit weaker, footing. …

Meanwhile, the U.S. is pitching a new coalition to jumpstart traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. Much of the MSM persists in peddling the line that Iran is winning. In a National Review piece on the U.S.’s destruction of Iran’s economy, Jim Geraghty has the last word on this theme:

When your country faces the prospect of hunger riots, you are not winning the war.

More bad news for Iran. The UAE’s withdrawal from OPEC rang the opening bell for the new geopolitical order that the war with Iran is ushering in across the Middle East. According to a highly recommended piece at Spiked Online, the UAE’s exit from OPEC is far bigger than the price of oil. Along with the Iran war, the OPEC withdrawal shatters any illusions about a unified “Muslim world.”

“Surprising Lessons from Talking with America’s Highest-Earning Women,” by Callum Borchers, at the Wall Street Journal, also shatters several illusions about working women. Borchers interviewed women earning $775,000 or more per year. Fascinating stuff:

It’s practically gospel that you need a thick skin to succeed in business, especially if you belong to an underrepresented group. Ditto for the notion that self-doubt holds you back.

Yet women who make at least $775,000 a year are less likely than others to describe themselves as tough or thick-skinned. They are also less likely to view themselves as unique or even unusual, according to a study by Emily Riley, a digital marketing executive and a former research director and analyst for advisory firms.

… But women who have cracked the top 1% of income show a patch of thin skin and a dose of self-doubt can be motivational assets.

From New Working Women to “The New Never Trumpers,” Rich Lowry’s excellent take on the former MAGA stalwarts such as Tucker Carlson and Sohrab Ahmari, who have gone full Bulwark. The Iran War was the turning point for several.

Depravity. Cole Allen took a selfie before entering the Washington Hilton ballroom the evening of the White House Correspondents Association dinner. Kimberley Strassel discusses the Left’s drive to ignore or obfuscate a murderous political agenda.

Amazon is discussing an “Apprentice” reboot with Don Jr. in the star role. Ms. Must has a better idea … “Live from the Oval Office—Apprentice II with Don Sr.”

I am off tomorrow, but I’ll reboot on Monday. See you then.