Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Readers respond: Diplomas should not be participation trophies

I attended last month’s Oregon State Board of Education meeting. (“Oregon board delays vote to freeze math, reading grad requirement for four more years after pushback,” Sept. 28).

While waiting for my turn to testify against Oregon’s new sex-ed state standards, I heard Board Chair Guadalupe Martinez Zapata explain her support for suspending the essential skills test grad requirement using an analogy of a thermometer. “Does a thermometer cure a patient of their illness?” she asked rhetorically and then continued, “An assessment does not provide learning for a student. It diagnoses whether the student has been able to learn or not.”

In other words, the board chair wants to award high school diplomas based on what’s been taught rather than what’s been learned. A high school diploma that is little more than a participation trophy does no one any favors.

A standard high school diploma has always been proof to the public and employers that a graduate has learned essential basic reading, writing and math skills. In 2021, the president of the Oregon Business Council explained that the requirement was crucial. Today it is even more necessary given valid concerns about “equitable” grading and increased opportunities for plagiarism, especially using new artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT and the like.

Oregon’s future, which likely includes $40 billion of federal CHIPs act-related investment and 6,300 new jobs, depends on its educated workforce.

It’s time for the governor-appointed education board to take the temperature in the room.

Mary Miller, Beaverton

Oregon Rolls the Dice on Transgender Care

I was glad to see the letter signed by 21 clinicians and researchers from nine countries that rejected the Endocrine Society’s claim that “gender-affirming care improves the well-being of transgender and gender-diverse people and reduces the risk of suicide” (July 14). In Oregon, activist groups and Democratic lawmakers used that claim to pass a new state law—signed by Gov. Tina Kotek right around when the letter was published—expanding access to these experimental, risky and sterilizing procedures.

The new law requires Oregon taxpayers to foot the bill and federal taxpayers to fund the medical-claims audit process. Oregon doctors also can now treat adolescents 15 years and older without parental permission or even notification. What’s happening in Oregon is a national scandal worthy of further investigation.