Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Ending income tax would give Missouri families room to breathe

Amy Hunt is a wife, mother of three boys, and a member of Independent Women’s Network. She lives in St. Charles. Originally appeared in St. Louis Post-Dispatch.


Do you ever check out at the grocery store and look at your cart thinking, “That’s it?”

This level of unaffordability is the most pressing issue for women today. We run our households, making most of the spending decisions. Over half of homes have women as de facto CFOs of the family.

Too many families are treading water and fearful of an unexpected expense. Even with pay increases now outpacing inflation, we still have years of hardship to recoup. Women who land a better job, receive a bonus, or land a promotion will feel the sting of their merit in the form of income taxes.

That disparity hits hard. But there’s hope for Missouri families who can consider eliminating state income taxes, which would unlock hundreds of dollars of their own income to curb the strain in their budgets, giving them the ability to save, invest, or just catch up.

Missouri voters face an opportunity to boost tax relief even further for all paycheck earners and make it permanent. We could join the growing number of U.S. states also phasing out their income taxes to pursue strong economic growth and attract new residents.

Earlier this month, the Missouri House of Representatives decisively passed a proposed constitutional amendment (HJR 173) to let voters decide to eliminate the state income tax by phasing it out.

The White House Council of Economic Advisors finds that Missouri workers could see average wages rise by about $2,800 per year, creating a massive financial cushion. This could also lead to a nearly 15% increase in business startups, a recipe for a thriving economy that could outpace neighboring states.

Income tax elimination is good for both tax payers and the state’s economy.

Analysis of Tax Foundation data found that non-income tax states accounted for 25% of the economic growth of the United States between 2010 and 2019. Typically, economies of states that never taxed income grew faster than those of states who had one. Conversely, states that adopted an income tax in the last six decades — including Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut — experienced slower growth than the rest of the country. Even U-Haul has identified a “discernible trend” of one-way customers moving out of high-tax states to low-tax states.

Any good constituent would ask, “But how will we pay for services?”

Currently, Missouri has a virtual flat income tax with the top rate around 4.7% on income over $9,436. The income tax comprises over half (about 60%) of the state’s general operating budget. Phasing out the income tax requires a reasonable revenue replacement plan to prevent disruptions to critical government services—such as roads, schools, and social safety net programs.

The bill under consideration would do so by expanding the sales tax and use tax base to tax more services and goods purchased in Missouri. The tax repeal won’t occur all at once though. A new revenue trigger allows the state to automatically phase out the income tax over time, with full elimination expected to happen around 2031.

While an almost foreign idea to some, state income tax elimination is actually popular with over half of Missourians. Some 52% of voters prefer sales taxes to individual income taxes to raise revenue, compared to 29% who prefer income taxes to sales taxes, according to a Saint Louis University/YouGov poll in February.

It is now our state senators who will need to heed the public support for income tax elimination and consider the good outcomes other states enjoy by passing HJR 173.

Place the final decision in the hands of voters this fall and give Missouri women more freedom to decide how best to use their household’s hard-earned dollars.

From Luke Air Force Base To Main Street: How Washington’s Shutdown Is Hitting Arizona Hard

Alison Furno is an Arizona Resident, Small Business Owner, and Independent Women’s Network Phoenix Co-Leader. This article originally appeared on AZ Free News.


As an Arizonan, a small business owner, and a concerned citizen, I’m deeply troubled by how the Left’s government shutdown is hurting our communities. Every day Washington fails to act, hardworking Arizonans pay the price.

Military families at bases like Luke and Davis-Monthan, air traffic controllers keeping our skies safe, National Guard members protecting our borders, and countless small business owners are being forced to shoulder the consequences of political inaction—many continuing to serve without pay or any certainty about the future. Furloughed federal workers in Tucson and Phoenix are dipping into savings just to cover groceries, while delayed permits and contracts grind local projects to a halt.

I run two small businesses here in Arizona—a volleyball coaching company and a social media management brand—so I see firsthand how government shutdowns ripple through real lives. They slow things down, shake confidence, and make it harder for families and business owners to plan ahead. When federal payments stall, suppliers wait longer to get paid, employees across industries worry about their next paycheck, and everyday customers start cutting back. It’s working families, small businesses, and community builders who feel it most—while politicians argue over deadlines and programs they created themselves.

Let’s rewind to March 2021. President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan—a massive spending package sold as emergency relief. Hidden inside was an expansion of premium tax credits under the Affordable Care Act, increasing federal payouts to insurers and expanding who qualifies. These subsidies were supposed to be temporary bridges to help Americans get through the pandemic. Yet years later, some in Washington are treating them as untouchable—willing to shut down the government rather than let them expire.

These subsidies were never meant to be permanent, and they can’t be sustained responsibly. The Congressional Budget Office projected that making them permanent would add over $34 billion to the federal deficit in the next decade.

Even worse, these handouts have distorted the healthcare market. When the government guarantees bigger subsidies no matter the cost, insurers and providers raise prices—knowing taxpayers will cover the difference. Executives pocket bonuses, red tape piles up, and real healthcare workers get squeezed. What was supposed to make care “affordable” has instead insulated the system from competition and transparency, driving costs higher for everyone not lucky enough to qualify for the subsidies.

The hard truth is that the Affordable Care Act never lived up to its name. It drove up prices and created layers of bureaucracy. Now, temporary subsidies—originally sold as short-term relief—are being treated as permanent entitlements. Holding the government and everyday Americans hostage over these failed policies is simply wrong.

Senators Kelly and Gallego, you represent a state known for independence and common sense. The House has already passed a clean Continuing Resolution to fund the government and end this unnecessary pain. Support it. Reopen federal agencies. Let our military families breathe easier, our air traffic controllers get their paychecks, and our small businesses plan for the future without Washington’s chaos.

Arizona’s working people have carried enough. It’s time for our leaders to choose stability over subsidies, solutions over gridlock, and the Grand Canyon State over partisan games. End the shutdown now.

ICYMI: IWN’s Stephanie Lundquist-Arora Tells Fox News: “This is Indoctrination; It’s Not Education.”

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author, and Independent Women’s Network chapter leader, and she is fighting back against the Fairfax County Public Schools’ decision to allow a woke alphabet display for Women’s History Month, which promoted content about abortion, “transgenderism,” and “queerness.” Lundquist-Arora has been speaking out for years to expose the inappropriate ideology that has crept into classrooms across the country. Her latest op-ed in The Daily Signal highlights the woke “ABCs to Me” display her son encountered at his Fairfax County high school.

Lundquist-Arora’s son, a sophomore at West Springfield High School, took pictures of the woke display, which featured signs such as “A is for Abortion,” “H is for Hope” with a picture of Kamala Harris, “J is for Justice” alongside the Ukrainian, Palestinian, and transgender flags, and “Q is for Queer.”

On Monday, Stephanie Lundquist-Arora joined Ingraham Angle on Fox News to discuss her reaction to the inappropriate display in her son’s school.

Watch the full clip of Ingraham Angle featuring Stephanie Lundquist-Arora below, or click HERE.

Lundquist-Arora told Laura Ingraham, “You just really have to be so proud of these kids. They’re leading the battlefront on this.”

She said, “A mom called me and told me her son had actually ripped down the ‘A is for Abortion’ sign. Her son was upset, and he was brought into the principal’s office, and they counseled him, and they said ‘Well, you had such a visceral reaction to this.’ And I think that’s just absurd. I mean, how could you not have an emotive reaction to this? Even adults do. And so I’m really proud of the students who are standing up and saying ‘This isn’t right. This isn’t the kind of school we want to be in. This is indoctrination; it’s not education.’”

When asked by Laura Ingraham about who came up with the display, Lundquist-Arora said, “I can’t imagine that a student came up with all of them. It was so ideologically one-sided: How could the students have come up with all of it? I think that’s probably coming from the teacher, and it’s supported by the administration. The display is still standing there, and the school policy also supports it.” 

Stephanie Lunquist-Aurora, as a fearless Independent Women’s Network leader, will continue speaking out to inspire, influence, and have impact as students face another school year with the woke agenda, cancel culture, and gender ideology pushed by teachers unions and liberal school boards.

Senior Rights Matter; Say NO to Prop 1: A Message from Makenna McCoy 

The election is 50 days away! On November 5, New Yorkers will see a problematic proposed constitutional amendment on their ballots that would threaten...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

An Urgent Conversation: What Parents Need to Know about Gender Ideology in Schools

In this interview, IWF’s Education Freedom Center Director Ginny Gentles, talks to Natalya Murakhver, co-founder of Restore Childhood, a national nonp...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

August Policy Focus: Transparency in Residentially Assigned Schools.

Every month, IWF releases a policy focus on issues affecting women and their families across the country. As valued members of IWN, we want to give yo...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login