Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Strikes in Iran War. Tish Tish: Bombshell Report that NY AG James Sicced Top Prosecutor on Trump Without Evidence. Boutique Socialists. Should We Fear AI ‘Takeover’? Double Standard on Left and Right Violence. More

The U.S. and Iran are exchanging strikes for the first time since July. The U.S. struck first to prevent Iranian forces from launching rockets from Larak Island. The Washington Post reports:

U.S. forces struck Iranian launchers in the Strait of Hormuz, the first publicly acknowledged attack on Tehran’s forces in nearly a month as the Trump administration navigates a tenuous ceasefire.

Iranian forces were preparing to fire rockets from Larak Island, in the country’s south, that would have dispersed sea mines into the strait, said Navy Capt. Tim Hawkins, a spokesman for Central Command.

U.S. forces in the region cleared long-lingering mines from shipping routes last week and “remain prepared to protect the free flow of commerce through this essential waterway,” Hawkins said.

Fighting flared in the Middle East:

Shortly after the strike, U.S. forces defended against missiles launched at Jordan, according to U.S. military officials. Jordan’s military said it successfully intercepted eight missiles that entered the country’s airspace.

Jordan hosts nearly 4,000 U.S. troops and is an important staging ground for U.S. military operations throughout the Middle East.

Larak is a small Iranian island in the Strait of Hormuz that has become a key military and shipping-control point for Tehran. The island is used by the Revolutionary Guards to monitor vessel traffic and sits in a strategic position overlooking the waterway, one of the world’s most important shipping routes.

Supply Concerns. Oil had jumped 3% by early this morning. Meanwhile, a Jewish Iranian refugee whose family fled the “butchers” of Iran 50 years ago, writes:

Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and the rest of the regime leadership are not trying to beat the American military; they are trying to outlast the American taxpayer, and the regime is banking its survival on exactly that.

My family fled the butchers who stole my country nearly five decades ago, and I have spent every year since watching the world try to manage, contain and negotiate with them. The Iranian people are not our enemy; they are the regime’s first hostages. America proved in Operation Midnight Hammer what the most powerful military in human history can do, and it is our job to finish the job.

“Should You Believe the Dire Warnings About ‘AI Takeover’?” asks the headline on a Tyler Cowen Free Press story. “Shocking new details of the Hugging Face hack have experts claiming that ‘full-blown AI takeover’ could be months away. Tyler Cowen disagrees,” reveals the subtitle. In case you are hazy about “Hugging Face,” here is how Cowen begins:

It happened more than a month ago, but my chat groups are still buzzing about the rogue AI hacking attack by OpenAI research agents.

In case you missed the details or are curious why so many people are still talking about it, some of those agents were able to evade controls designed to keep them away from the internet and burrow into the systems of Hugging Face, a popular AI platform. The AI agents also covered their tracks. Some agents sacrificed themselves for the other agents. It took about three days for Hugging Face to detect that it had been hacked—and another week for the maker of ChatGPT to confirm that it was responsible for the escaped hackers.

AI might not be alone in going rogue. According to a bombshell report that was deleted but also obtained by a New York newspaper, a veteran prosecutor in the office of New York AG Tish James claims he was ordered to dig up dirt on people and groups “affiliated with Donald Trump”:

Former Brooklyn Prosecutor Daniel Wiesenfeld alleged in his email on Friday that Bureau Chief Shamiso Maswoswe specifically directed him to target “Trump himself, Truth Social, Hewlett Packard (DOJ approved merger)… without having a credible reason for targeting the organizations and individuals,” the outlet reported.

New York Post ace Miranda Devine responds with a column headlined “AG Letitia James turns evil eye on Trump — and blind eye to NY crime.” The story also made the cover of the New York Post: “Tish Witch Hunt.”

Maybe President Trump is Tish’s great white whale? Wall Street Journal columnist Mary Anastasia O’Grady contends that Canada is President Trump’s great white whale:

Is President Trump secretly working for Canada’s Liberal Party? You could be forgiven for thinking so after the failure of trade talks with Ottawa sent support soaring for Prime Minister Mark Carney’s handling of the matter. If there’s one thing conservative Canadians dislike more than the sniveling lefties running their federal government, it’s the bombastic Mr. Trump.

On Thursday the U.S. president said he is changing the name of Lake Ontario in federal records to Lake America. That’ll show ’em who’s boss. But Canada has its own ideas about how to inflict pain …

The great English novelist Charles Dickens has a good lesson for us on how raising taxes on the rich can actually hurt the poor most of all. The Wall Street Journal’s Allysia Finley writes about how an 18th-century British levy targeted people of means and plunged the poor into darkness. In “Boutique Socialism and the DSA,” Kyle Smith asks, “Where are all the actual workers in this ‘working class’ political movement?” Smith writes. Do read Smith’s piece—you must meet the privileged commie, who asks, “but like have y’all never heard of noblesse oblige?” 

What caused the socialist wave? Writing at Real Clear Politics, Mark Serrano proposes that it was the constant demonization of President Trump:

But here’s the problem with crying fascist non-stop for a decade: Your own voters start asking why you’re not acting like it’s real. Far-left podcaster Jennifer Welch labeled Schumer and Jeffries “fascist collaborators” for not fighting hard enough. Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Institute, criticized the left’s idol, Barack Obama, for sacrificing his “megaphone” during the second Trump term. 

You cannot spend 10 years telling your base that democracy is one election from extinction and act surprised when they demand radical change. That radical change is the Democratic Socialists of America.

What do Dems and Republicans have in common? “Democrats want the midterms to be about Trump. He does, too,” is a WaPo headline. “As Republicans fight to hold Congress, Trump and his allies are spending money and political capital to keep him at the center of the campaign,” the WaPo declares. From the report:

“It’s going to be a Trumpapalooza you’re not gonna want to miss!” RNC Chairman Joe Gruters said in a social media video.

“The Political Violence Double Standard” is a terrific City Journal piece by John Tierney. “The left-wing kind is discounted; the right-wing kind is exaggerated,” argues Tierney. He writes:

These statistical games obscure a fundamental distinction. Mentally disturbed lone wolves appear on the fringes of both sides, but organized violence in pursuit of political goals is not a right-wing specialty; it is a left-wing one. Since the French Revolution, it has been a recurring strategy for movements seeking to gain and wield power. Yet the Left’s influence over legacy media and cultural institutions continues to sustain the myth that right-wing violence poses the greater public danger.

…

But the most alarming sight that weekend turned out to be at the state capitol in Lansing, Michigan, where hundreds of National Guard troops and police in riot gear, backed by armored vehicles, stood watch over 25 protesters, most of them members of the Boogaloo Bois, an antigovernment movement. The throng of 150 journalists photographed the ones with rifles but otherwise recorded nothing more exciting than a short statement by their leader, who displayed a Pride rainbow flag sticking out of his body armor as he declared peaceful solidarity with all groups protesting tyranny. In Lincoln, Nebraska, two lonely protesters stood outside the capitol. In Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, reporters from around the world took turns interviewing the single protester.

Why didn’t the vast network of right-wing fanatics mobilize its troops? Because the network doesn’t exist. There’s no right-wing equivalent of Code Pink, Extinction Rebellion, the Democratic Socialists of America, and the rest of the Left’s protest-industrial complex. The professionals inhabiting that world have spent decades mastering the art of turning out crowds for the progressive cause du jour: Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, the Global Climate Strike, the Women’s March, Free Palestine, Abolish ICE, No Kings, No Data Centers, No Billionaires, and whatever banner the Omniprotest flies next.

How Do You Solve a Problem Like Hasan? Mamdani’s Moral Universe. Columnist: Trump Has the Data on Data Centers. Would Putin Gamble on Attacking a NATO Country? Schoen: Dems Will Die on ‘Trans’ Hill. More

Trendy New York magazine this week published a story that has Dems, who until recently gleefully dreamed of a big, rolling blue wave, feeling unsettled: “The Hasan Piker Michigan Mess Isn’t Going Away” is the New York mag headline.

Piker, you’ll remember, is the radical commentator who said the United States “deserved” September 11 and subsequently campaigned with Michigan’s Democratic senatorial hopeful Abdul El-Sayed, who has suddenly taken to referring to Mr. Piker as “some Twitch streamer in California.” El-Sayed devoted much of his week to dealing with Piker-related matters.

As is often the case, the (barely) satirical Babylon Bee had the audacity to provide the best summation of the Piker Problem:  

Democrats Distance Themselves from Hasan Piker After Realizing He’s Wearing a Suicide Vest

Meanwhile, Republicans are urged not to count their chickens before they hatch. “Can Anyone Beat Abdul El-Sayed?” is the headline on a Free Press story by Noah Bernstein. “The Democratic establishment tried and failed to stop him in Michigan’s Senate primary. Will Republicans fare any better?” asks Bernstein.

Bernstein suggests why El-Sayed’s opponents “struggle to slow him down”:

The public got another look at why when El-Sayed joined Fox News host Jesse Watters for a lengthy interview on Monday. He dodged a question about transgender surgeries for minors, instead asking Watters if he is circumcised. He deflected another about sharia law, pointing out that no one dreads the spread of Catholic canon law. And when asked about his support for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), he answered that voters are more worried about the price of gas and groceries—a line he deployed deftly time and again.

Ms. Must would say that the struggle is to pin him down.

We first met Mr. Piker when he campaigned for and advised now-Mayor of New York Zohran Mamdani. With that in mind, a fascinating piece in City Journal entitled “Mamdani’s Moral Universe” is of special interest. As author Zineb Riboua points out, Mamdani’s intellectual foundation is built on Israel, Third Worldism, and the politics of grievance:

As formal decolonization advanced, however, the original target—imperialism—largely disappeared. The Third-Worldist ideology then migrated into Western universities and domestic political movements. There it was repurposed, functioning today less as a foreign policy doctrine than as a moral lens through which all political legitimacy is assigned. In this framework, Israel occupies the role of an imperial oppressor, while Palestinians—and, by extension, other perceived victims of Western power—serve as privileged victims. The result is a politics of grievance that is now the operating language of a rising generation of American progressives.

The Islamist dimension of this phenomenon warrants special attention. … The Islamist-friendly current within the American Left, embodied by activists like Linda Sarsour, has therefore found expression through anti-Israel polemics, which, in depicting Israel as a settler-colonial project requiring decolonization, translates religious commitments to the Ummah (wider Muslim community) into terms more readily accepted by a secular electorate.

Sympathy for the Devil. Taking note of Mamdani’s moral universe, the New York Post cover this morning features Mamdani’s condolences sent on the death at Rikers of a career criminal who previously hacked to death the father of two. Before the gruesome hacking of a victim, the late Clarence Woodward had a rap sheet with 30 arrests. The Mayor of New York was “deeply saddened” by this scumbag’s death. The family of the murdered father was not pleased. Talk about a topsy-turvy moral universe.

What Is It about those Jasmines? Don’t miss the screaming “Mean Girls” meltdown of Oklahoma Democratic Senate nominee N’Kiyla Jasmine Thomas, which reportedly led several critics to muse on candidate quality. Meanwhile, Florida’s socialist candidate for the U.S. Senate, Angie Nixon, says, “Let me be clear, we are in chains.” (Did she have speech input from Joe Biden?)

“Trump Follows the Data on Data Centers” is the headline on Matthew Continetti’s column. President Trump has been accused of going against his MAGA base on data centers. Continetti writes:

Rather than betraying MAGA, then, Mr. Trump’s support for data centers reflects his unique blend of markets and mercantilism. He may be on the unpopular side of a boiling issue. But he’s willing to take a political hit in exchange for strengthening Washington’s position against Beijing.

Data centers house the computing power that drives this technological marvel. Nor are tech companies the only winners. Skilled labor is required to build data centers. The pay is good, employment is steady and job sites are fixed in place. If you think building a data center is tough, try moving it. Union official Don Slaiman writes that data centers “are the best opportunity in generations for blue-collar workers to attain a portion of the American dream.” …

I don’t pretend that data centers are cost-free. Nothing is. But the costs that data centers might carry in land use, water use, electricity prices, noise pollution and unsightliness are either overstated or fixable. Creative policy is called for. Not moratoriums that would make America poor and weak.

In her Friday column headlined “The Media’s Lawfare Enabling,” Kimberley Strassel writes about how journalists who knew better cheered on meritless lawsuits against President Trump. “How long is the public meant to treat the press’s pearl-clutching as genuine, rather than part of a campaign to undermine the administration and the credibility of the high court?’ Strassel asks. In a similar vein, Ilya Shapiro argues at City Journal that “‘reform” has become the Left’s preferred remedy for losing cases at the nation’s highest court.

“Would Putin Really Tangle With NATO?” is the headline on a Wall Street Journal editorial. Would Putin calculate that President Trump would not come to Europe’s aid? the editors ask. You wouldn’t be jumping to false conclusions if you suggested that CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s semi-cloak-and-dagger trip to Russia had something to do with this issue.

The jury is now deliberating in the Lindsay Clancy trial (they might reach a verdict today, but I doubt it). USA TODAY columnist Nicole Russell originally could understand why so many women felt bad for Clancy. But then Russell was surprised that Clancy was being turned into a martyr:

Reactions online, though, fed by an algorithm hungry for emotional outbursts and likes, have opened a dark window into what many women are actually feeling about motherhood and Clancy. It goes well beyond a dose of justice or a touch of compassion and has devolved into solidarity with, even veneration of, the mother of three.

From her wheelchair and without a single word of testimony, Clancy has whipped up a frenzied fandom of women who have made her a martyr. It’s dangerous and disgusting.

Yes, it’s a hill they’re willing to die on: Democratic Pollster Doug Schoen explores a question that is mystifying to some: “Why Democrats cannot break free from the far left’s transgender demands.” Schoen:

Simply put, the DSA’s strong opposition to legislation banning biological males from competing in women’s sports has come to define where the national Democratic Party stands, much to its detriment.

Huh? I’m confused. There’s still a sub rosa report/rumor going around that the WNBA already has had a “trans” identifying player on its roster. Meanwhile, the radical WARPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health) appears to be trying to distance itself from its own claims. That would help WARPATH in court.

Short Takes. He’s not just a Ragin’ Cajun; he’s a Bluesky rage-oholic, according to Jonathan Turley. … National Review’s witty Jeffrey Blehar is not on board with Lake America. … But nobody should be on board with Canadian Broadcasts’ latest dictum: CBC has directed reporters not to call the September 11 attacks on the United States “terrorist attacks.” I don’t know what to say.

Does Big Tech = Big Tobacco? Karl Rove: Nixing Nixon. How Socialist Policies Deny Immigrants the American Dream. Hijab Lessons for Girl Scouts. Hakeem: Feelin’ the Pressure. Royal Good-bye for Dolly. More

Seismic.

That’s how one commentator described Meta’s surprise $17 billion settlement yesterday in a lawsuit—it is the largest tech settlement in history.

The case was brought by a coalition of state AGs, and it argued that the social media giant misrepresented the extent of child-related mental health harms caused by apps like Facebook and Instagram. Minors, the AGs contended, suffered from addiction to Meta products. In addition to the financial settlement, Meta will impose an array of restrictions on use of its products by minors.

An editorial in the Wall Street Journal was initially surprised by the settlement (“Who expected that?”) but then found the settlement “sensible”: It ended litigation for Meta and was for a far smaller payout than the AGs originally asked (which could have exceeded $1.4 trillion). Meta could well absorb the smaller amount. The editors went on to raise serious questions about the lawsuit:   

Demanding that Meta pay up and change its platform won’t limit teen social-media use unless similar restrictions apply to other platforms. It could even result in teens spending more time on other platforms with fewer protections. That’s one reason it’s best to address problematic youth social-media use through the political process.

Jackpot justice also lets lawmakers off the hook. Why should Congress put in the work to resolve thorny issues if states can leverage the legal system to force a resolution, which may lack political consensus? Speaking of consensus, notable are the two state AG holdouts, Florida Republican James Uthmeier and New Mexico Democrat Raúl Torrez.

Might they be snubbing the settlement in hopes of obtaining bigger contingency fee awards for their plaintiff attorney friends assisting their litigation—Motley Rice for Mr. Torrez and Keller Postman for Mr. Uthmeier?

George Washington University law professor and Fox Contributor Jonathan Turley compared the Meta suit to the barrage of suits against tobacco companies (in which the concept of actual addiction is clearer):

Ironically, if social media is as addictive as claimed by litigants, the market is equally inelastic. Big media will be able to easily recoup these damages, as did Big Tobacco. Much of these damages could ultimately be passed on to and borne by social media users through advertising, production or cost decisions. They would potentially operate like a tax for states receiving the funds. …

The platform will clearly make positive changes that will assist parents after Wednesday’s proposed settlement announcement. These are straightforward changes that have long been needed. Hopefully, these states will not just take this money and run as many did with the tobacco windfall. Instead, it would be a great help if the money went to enhancing children’s mental-health programs….

Meta did not create these social costs alone. We all did. We find ourselves overwhelmed by a technology with endless applications and potential for expression. This settlement will not erase those social costs any more than the tobacco settlement erased cancer or the opiate settlement erased addiction.

The ultimate child-protection regulation will remain parents monitoring and educating their own children.

An editorial in the Wall Street Journal a week or so before the shock settlement also made the Big Tobacco comparison. As for the restrictions:

Such laws might do some good. But the legal attacks on Meta merely let politicians pretend to protect children while the trial lawyers reap giant paydays. Talk about exploiting children for political profit.

Taking a different view, Emily Cherkin of The Free Press argues that “Meta’s Social Media Settlement Is Not Enough“:

Meta just agreed to make sweeping changes to protect young people online. But the settlement leaves its fundamentally harmful business model intact.

We’re still scratching our heads over CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s quickie trip to Russia. President Trump called the trip “semi-routine,” but Owen Matthews of the London Spectator speculated:

The list of topics urgent enough to prompt the first personal visit of a US cabinet-level official to the Kremlin in six months is short. Ratcliffe could have been responding to reports of a planned Russian escalation against NATO, trying to enlist the Kremlin’s help for Donald Trump’s stalling campaign against Iran or discussing a draconian sanctions bill that could devastate the Russian economy that lies locked and loaded in Congress pending its final reading. 

But the true mystery that made the flying visit unusual – and also, for many observers, alarming – was that Ratcliffe was clearly in Moscow to communicate something too sensitive or too urgent to be discussed through the regular phone calls with Sergei Naryshkin.

We’re all thinking about the midterms. Especially WSJ politics guru Karl Rove, whose column today (“Nix on Nixon: How to Defeat the DSA in the Midterms“) consists of a template speech for a Florida political candidate, which could be adapted for other venues. A snippet from The Speech:

How bad could it be? Let’s start with this: The DSA platform wants an America where “you don’t pay a mortgage or have a landlord.” Sounds nice, until you get to the details. In DSA world, government will “build new, publicly-owned social housing.”

Some will remember those big, ugly apartment blocks in the Soviet Union. That’s DSA leaders’ vision, whether they admit it or not. Unless they say otherwise, you should assume Angie Nixon and my Democratic opponent support it.

Although she’s not providing a model speech, my Independent Women colleague Patrice Onwuka in a Washington Post op-ed this morning does something similar to what Rove does—Patrice tells you how socialist policies would affect real people—in this case, immigrant families such as Patrice’s, who came to the U.S. 41 years ago from a tiny spot on the map called Montserrat. A snippet:

I never get tired of only-in-America stories. My belief in the promise of the United States is endlessly renewed by the rich experiences of diverse people who moved to this nation for safety, freedom and opportunity. That’s what makes the socialist movement now surging through the Democratic Party so distressing: It challenges the very ethos that drew my family here.

Importantly, my parents rejected government dependency. During the immigration application process, they had to prove their ability to support their family. Even during hard times, they never sought a penny of public support.

But the Mamdanis of the world ignore the basic economics of the rental market. Freezing rents does not freeze the costs of property ownership and management. The cost of taxes, water, utilities, appliances, home repairs and more continues to rise. Landlords increase rental prices to cover those costs and make enough profit to justify their investments of resources and time. There’s nothing sinister about this form of generational wealth-building.

How can “our democracy” continue to work if one side refuses to even speak to representatives of the other side? The uproar on the Left triggered by House Minority Leader Hakeen Jeffries merely meeting with Jared Kushner would be funny if it didn’t indicate a breakdown in government and politics.

To compensate, the beleaguered Jeffries went on CNN to harumph to Wolf Blitzer about “holding every single member of the Trump cartel accountable.” Jeffries of course is running scared—he very likely won’t keep his job if DSA members have any say.

Girls, Stick to Selling those Yummy Mint Cookies:

Girls Scouts of the USA pushed back Wednesday on reports that mosque-based troops incorporated Islamic prayer, hijab lessons and faith-specific patches into scouting activities across several states, saying outside faith organizations independently run the optional programs.

Closing arguments in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, who killed her three children, are set to begin. The verdict hinges on whether Ms. Clancy, who suffered from severe mental health problems, knew right from wrong. The defense couldn’t have liked the bombshell testimony of the prosecution’s last witness.

We Will Always Love You, Dolly. Buckingham Palace guard honored Dolly Parton with a rousing rendition of her hit “9 to 5” in front of the palace. By orders of Their Majesties King Charles and Queen Camilla.

Our hearts go out to the victims: The death toll of the Nepal flood surges as 65 Americans are listed among the fatalities. Meanwhile, a Chinese state outlet is claiming that 558 people are missing in Tibet. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted that the U.S. Department of State “stands ready” to help Nepal.

Farewell to Dolly Parton. Rhinestones and Self-Reliance. Darline Graham Scores Narrow Win. Coalition of the Pathetic. WaPo Forced to Rehire Bad Karen. Leaflet: Please Try Not to Rape Anyone. More

Dolly Parton, whose death yesterday at the age of 80 brought an intense outpouring of grief, was that rare cultural icon beloved by everyone.

“We Will Always Love You, Dolly,” proclaimed the New York Post cover. The Free Press elaborated:

Equally beloved by Baptist church ladies and buxom drag queens, Dolly’s Southern charm drew everyone into her orbit.

She is remembered as “Dolly Parton, Pure Product of America” (also the Free Press, by Caitlin Flanagan):

Try to think of anyone who has made as deep and long-lasting a mark on American culture as she has.

“From rags to rhinestones – farewell to the Queen of Country” is the headline to a story that celebrates her “more than 200 songs throughout her incredible career, including hits such as Jolene and 9 To 5, and I Will Always Love You, made famous by Whitney Houston’s cover in the 1990s.” Choked up Tennessee Governor Bill Lee told Gillian Turner that his state had “lost its favorite daughter.” Just FYI: The Governor’s favorite Dolly Parton hit is “Coat of Many Colors.” Her appeal, writes James B. Meigs in the Wall Street Journal’s Free Expression section, “went beyond her larger-than-life image.” She was “the only voice in the world,” adds Bob Greene.

Even George Will loved Dolly. Will’s column is headlined “Gifted in Song and Storytelling, She Got the Rainbow.” Will recalls that Ms. Parton’s “ethic of self-reliance.” It’s a terrific column, and I bet Ms. Parton would love it:

The doctor who ushered the infant Dolly Rebecca Parton into the world in 1946 was paid with a sack of cornmeal. Such was the transactional nature of health care for some around the Great Smoky Mountains in East Tennessee. Her father and mother had been 17 and 15, respectively, when they married, and could not have imagined how the world would be their daughter’s oyster.

But not immediately. …Her family knew the old story of a cheerful preacher saying to a hardscrabble farmer, “This is a right nice place you and Lord have here,” and the farmer replying, “You should have seen the som’bitch when the Lord had it hisself.” Young Dolly was steeped in the ethic of self-reliance.

Another Plucky Southern Woman. Trump-endorsed Senator Darline Graham narrowly won the Senate runoff yesterday in South Carolina. The sister of the late Senator Lindsey Graham defeated Rep. Ralph Norman. Axios notes:

The victory underscores Trump’s continued sway with Republican voters and positions Graham as the odds-on favorite to win a full term in November.

James Antle writes in the Examiner that the victory of Senator Graham, who flubbed a national defense question, has a message for the GOP for midterms:

Maybe voters, including even Republican primary voters, are more interested in the economy and domestic issues than foreign affairs.

Maybe Too Plucky. Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed tried to fend off a question about gender treatment for minors from Fox host Jesse Watters by asking Watters if he was circumcised. Bethany Mandel suggests that El-Sayed’s “dodge-and-weave” performance will hurt Democrats:

El-Sayed wasn’t just unprepared to answer questions on transgender medical interventions for children; he was equally unable to intelligently discuss Sharia law, reparations, healthcare costs and windmills on Lake Michigan. 

His smarmy performance has been a gift to Republicans who see in the candidate a dark turn toward a new generation of extremists running as Democrats: elites promoting socialism while remaining deeply disconnected from the concerns of everyday Americans. 

“Ascendant No More, Democrats Are a Coalition of the Pathetic” is the intriguing headline on Matthew Continetti’s WSJ column. Ronald Brownstein coined the term “coalition of the ascendant” to describe Obama voters, who were destined to hold an “enduring advantage” over Republicans. But the coalition was not so enduring:

What has replaced the coalition of the ascendant is a coalition of the pathetic: Very Online millennials and zoomers with college and graduate degrees, few prospects and far-out beliefs. They take their cues from Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists of America. They want to cut off aid to Israel, abolish private health insurance and immigration enforcement, nix the Electoral College and even the Senate, pack the Supreme Court and grant statehood to Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. Establishment Democrats want to harness its energy while encouraging it to become more moderate. Good luck. …

Grievance drives the new socialism—outrage that their educational credentials haven’t delivered them wealth and status. According to Nate Silver, Americans with advanced degrees and incomes of $30,000 to $60,000 are the most Democratic voting bloc. The three largest self-described occupations in the 2021 DSA member survey were “unemployed, disabled, retired” (15%), “white collar” (13%) and “teacher, scholar, academic” (10%).

The well-credentialed are likely to push “postmaterial” causes such as climate alarmism, transgenderism, defunding the police and opposition to Israel. But the ideas that motivate the new coalition repel parts of the old one.

“Most Depressing Election of the Year” is Best of the Web columnist James Freeman’s headline:

One can argue that Los Angeles voters have only themselves to blame after a primary mayoral election in which they rejected the candidate urging a new approach to the city’s rising homelessness.

On the other hand, more timely reporting of the depth of the crisis might have made a difference in a fairly close election. Regardless, it’s almost as if the city’s working, taxpaying residents are now being taunted by candidates asking which flavor of tragic boondoggle they prefer.

Germane. In “California’s Billion-Dollar Union Machine,” in City Journal, natch, Chris Rufo and Schrupp write about public-sector unions that harvest taxpayer cash and rule the state.

The Supreme Court, as you’ve likely heard, lifted the hold on President Trump’s executive order enlisting the U.S. Postal Service to help restrict mail in voting. But, as an editorial in the Wall Street Journal complains, the Justices did not address the legality of the president’s order but only the pause. The midterms are looming, but the core issue remains undecided:  

Yet the Court emphasizes it takes no position on the lawfulness of whatever concrete changes might result from Mr. Trump’s order: “On that score, time will tell.” As it happens, the USPS on Friday published its final rule, effective immediately, though it’s currently blocked by a second injunction, issued by the same judge in a separate case. The Trump Administration also wants that one dissolved, though a challenge to the final rule will arrive before long.

It’s hard to imagine Mr. Trump’s plan could take effect before November, and the timing is getting worse.The Administration first asked the Justices for help on July 27. What took so long? The main opinion is 10 pages. A dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, is four pages and says the decision “merely postpones” the case.

As usual, one Justice distinguished herself:

Then comes Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, with a separate 23-page dissent, diving into the merits. “The President does not have any legal authority to require that elections be conducted in accordance with his preferences,” she says, “or to withhold delivery of mail-in ballots that are not formatted consistent with the President’s wishes.” If she’d resisted the urge to write this and deploy the word “Kafkaesque,” could the Court have ruled sooner?

What is the fastest-growing religion in the U.S.? You’ve probably read about young people converting to Catholicism, but the fastest-growing religion is Islam. Paul Sperry addresses the refusal of a large segment of Muslims to assimilate to U.S. culture in “American Medinas: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam.”

But the West seems eager to adjust our culture to that of recalcitrant newcomers. In “Welcome to Britain. Remember Not to Rape Anyone,” Louise Perry writes about the leaflets the U.K. prepared for immigrants. “We Shall Leaflet Them on the Beaches,” promises Mark Steyn in response to the U.K.’s helpful reminders.  

Reinstated. The Washington Post has been forced to rehire columnist Karen Attiah, who called Charlie Kirk a “white man that espoused violence.” She’s a charmer all right:

In another post that day, she wrote: “Refusing to tear my clothes and smear ashes on my face in performative mourning for a white man that espoused violence is … not the same as violence.”

The Path to Zero. That’s the title of a new Wall Street Journal documentary on our catastrophic Joe Biden-ordered withdrawal from Afghanistan, which you can view online. It is billed as an “unflinching account of America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, told by the people who lived it.”

Economic War on ‘Outcast’ Iran. Bessent ‘Unleashed.’ War of Words with Canada. El-Sayed Asks What We All Long to Know: Are You Circumcised, Jesse? Street Vagrants. And More

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent spoke softly but carried a big stick. A very big stick. In a press briefing yesterday, Bessent updated the Trump administration’s policy for Iran: “‘Operation Economic Outcast’ to Isolate and Squeeze Iran.”

Another report from the same outlet: After military and diplomatic efforts, President Trump pins his hopes on economic warfare. Speaking softly did not rule out bluntness, as this story (“Can General Bessent win the war?“) from the London Spectator makes clear:

The United States, Bessent said, is now imposing unprecedented sanctions not only on Iran but on every country, corporation, bank, and shipping company that does business with that regime.  

Thanks to these US policies, Bessent said, all Iran’s facilitators must now choose between economic ties with the US and those with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Do business with Iran and you will be severed from the US market and the entire dollar-based trading system, the centerpoint of the world economy. 

That policy can be summed up in two words: “economic asphyxiation.” Bessent actually used those words.

A favorable editorial in the Wall Street Journal is headlined “Trump Unleashes Scott Bessent on Iran.” Secretary Bessent compared Operation Economic Outcast to D-Day:

The D-Day analogy may be grandiose, but President Trump has waited nearly six months to take this economic step. Early in the war the U.S. even encouraged Iranian oil exports.

We’ve come a long way. Last week Iran’s central-bank governor admitted the U.S. blockade of Iran’s ports has driven the regime’s oil exports to zero. The United Arab Emirates also announced a halt to all trade with Iran. Mr. Bessent said that was “not a coincidence.”…

Mr. Trump has belatedly found a pressure strategy with Iran that may give him the upper hand. But the IRGC is unlikely to give up its financing networks without a fight. Will Mr. Trump stick to this strategy when Iran next fires on Gulf energy and whispers a soothing word to mediators from Pakistan and Qatar?

The New York Post treated the new policy more colloquially. “Out of Mullah” with a picture of the Supreme Leader empty-handed is the cover. Iran’s currency has plunged with citizens attempting to cash out before U.S. restrictions:  

The rial dropped to 2.02 million to one US dollar when the currency markets opened on Monday, meaning the currency is now worth about half of what it was at the start of the year.

Meanwhile, the regime broadcast a three-minute video fantasizing about killing Barron Trump and put a $10 million bounty on President Trump’s 20-year-old son.

National Review’s Noah Rothman posted this story about the same time as Super Scott appeared at the lectern: “Trump Urged to Surrender Quickly in Hormuz Before Success Becomes an Option.” The surrender option comes from the New York Times and other members of the MSM.

The administration’s tariff on Canada didn’t get a good review from the WSJ. An editorial is headlined “The Dumbest Trade War Revisited.” Here is Fox Digital on the back-and-forth between Canadian and U.S. leaders. It’s not just tariffs that are escalating—it’s bombast. The American Spectator is unsympathetic to Canada in Scott McKay’s “Mark Carney’s Smuggler’s Blues.”

President Trump received good news yesterday when the Supreme Court eased the way for the president’s sweeping limits on mail-in voting:

A divided Supreme Court on Monday eased the path for an executive order by President Donald Trump that would impose sweeping new restrictions on mail-in balloting for November’s midterm elections, but the complex and fast-moving legal fight is not over.

The executive order would bar the U.S. Postal Service from sending mail-in ballots to voters not on lists of citizens created by federal agencies. States also would be obligated to send the ballots in envelopes that can be tracked to thwart fraud.

The decision did not address the legality of the Executive Order but ruled rather on whether the states that sued had standing. There will be further challenges.

Socialist Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed appeared for a contentious and wide-ranging interview on Jesse Watters last night and asked Watters exactly what America longs to know: “Are you circumcised, Jesse?” Here’s the—uh—context:

Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed got extremely personal with Fox News host Jesse Watters on Monday — asking if he is circumcised — during a bizarre defense of sex change surgery for minors.

“Do you really want to have this conversation? Are you circumcised?” El-Sayed bluntly asked the “Jesse Watters Primetime” host, after arguing that the government shouldn’t get involved in transgender medical procedures for children.

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani is facing a legal challenge from minority-owned bodegas and supermarkets who realize that Mamdani’s government-owned grocery stores will likely destroy their livelihoods. Amazon has also attracted Mamdani’s adverse attention:

At the heart of the showdown between Mamdani and Amazon is the Delivery Protection Act, which Amazon says would put the jobs of more than 5,000 delivery workers at risk and land heavily on the small businesses that deliver its packages.

A Wall Street Journal editorial earlier this month explained that Mamdani wants to ban Amazon subcontracting and “deliver” the company to the Teamsters, which would raise prices for consumers; it would also reduce freedom for workers rather than protecting them.

Ms. Must was surprised to learn who until recently prevented New York from becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the far Left. “After Cuomo, New York Lost Its Check on the Far Left” is a City Journal title. Joseph Burns writes convincingly that former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who resigned because of MeToo accusations, is not a conservative and should never be seen as one, but he was willing to thwart the far Left.

“No, Street Vagrants Are Not “Our Neighbors’” is the headline on Heather Mac Donald’s latest iconoclasm (also in City Journal):

A Los Angeles city councilman just coined a new appellation for the drug-addicted vagrants who colonize city streets. They are “our neighbors,” says Hugo Soto-Martínez, a member of the L.A. Chapter of Democratic Socialists of America. Who knew?

This new identity is even more cheeky than the original rebranding of such vagrants as “the homeless.” …

“Neighbor” traditionally conjures the image of someone with an equal stake in one’s community as oneself, who shares one’s interest in stability, and who can be counted on, in times of need, for help. The occupants of the feces- and drug-strewn trash sites euphemistically referred to as “encampments,” as if they were part of a Boy Scout Jamboree, don’t fit the bill.

Those transients are parasites on other people’s efforts to create a community. They contribute nothing, pay no rent or taxes, and inevitably bring lawlessness and predation. They almost invariably turn down the shelter and services offered by feckless outreach workers, since they want no interference with their unrestricted drug use.

Meantime, a member of the vast nonprofit industry dedicated to keeping vagrants on the streets demonstrated the brilliance of the original “homeless” moniker….

Triple Crown for City Journal Today: Don’t miss “A Bellwether for Militancy? The DSA’s New National Youth Leaders,” in which Stu Smith takes a look at the two new co-chairs of the DSA, “who embrace militant labor organizing, international socialist coordination, and plans for a nationwide general strike in 2028.”

The MSM was only too thrilled to run with Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff’s taunt about President Trump’s aide Natalie Harp. Joe Concha argues that this was rock bottom for the legacy media. “Harp is a loyal Trump aide, not a scandal. Get over it,” USA TODAY’s Nicole Russell advises the legacy press.

Vroom, vroom, ya’ll. “Trump’s D.C. Car Race Is the Best of Populism” is the headline on Nicholas Clairmont’s Free Press article:

The race that zoomed around Washington showed what Trump is good at: spectacular and kitschy fun of the most public and American sort. Perhaps he should run for mayor.

The Insane Lindsay Clancy Moms Cult. Turley: Hasan Piker Is Pied Piper of Hate. Is Iran’s Supreme Leader ‘Scared Strait’? Crazy Rich Commies: The Young and The Reckless. AOC Hasn’t Abandoned Her Nutty Economic Theories. More

The trial of Lindsay Clancy, who strangled her three children and then injured herself, may move into its final phase with summations this week. Outside the courtroom, women in pink display their support for Clancy.

“Lindsay Clancy killed her kids. Why are women defending her?” asks the headline over Nicole Russell’s USA TODAY column. Russell writes:

Lindsay Clancy’s trial has gripped women and mothers across the country, but not for the reasons I expected, especially as a mother myself. …

Outside the courthouse Aug. 20, hundreds of Lindsay Clancy supporters, mostly women, rallied for her. Some wore pink emblazoned with slogans like “Believe,” “She Needed Help” and “Peace for Lindsay.” Attendees told reporters that Clancy’s story resonated with them and exposes the need for mental health help.

Online, Clancy support seems ubiquitous. One woman wrote a Substack that simply claims, “I could have been Lindsay Clancy.” A GoFundMe for Clancy’s parents, to help cover trial costs, features a drawing on its front page: a wheelchair-bound Clancy, head in her hands, surrounded by rings of women holding hands in solidarity. It’s reached more than half its $2 million goal.

Russell recognizes that Lindsay Clancy’s anguish is real and doesn’t give an opinion of whether Clancy, whose lawyers argue that she is not guilty because of insanity, should be convicted. The focus is on the outpouring of sympathy for Clancy and her Medea-like acts.

The same is true of New York Post columnist Miranda Devine, whose headline posits that Clancy’s “sick fans are just normalizing the horror of a mother killing her three children”:

The bizarre fandom around Lindsay Clancy is the latest example of a moral rot infecting a small cohort of conspiracy-minded, self-engrossed women. …

“We are all Lindsay” is their sick message.

One woman sobbed on camera that Lindsay can’t hug her children’s stuffed toys because her cruel husband supposedly threw them away. But what about the children who can’t hug their toys? The father who can’t hug his children?

It’s the same inversion behind the Luigi Mangione fangirls, the London mob who valorized Cambridge hoaxer Jason Arday and the demonization of Erika Kirk.

The Free Press headline on the Clancy cult is “The Moms of TikTok Have Gone Insane.” The chilling subtitle on Kara Kennedy’s piece:

We’ve been telling women for decades that motherhood is one of the worst things that can happen to them. So is it any surprise that so many moms now see child-killing mom Lindsay Clancy as a martyr?

Of the Lindsay Clancy phe-mom-enon, Kennedy adds:

This brain rot has spread like wildfire, as the algorithms made sure it would, and in the momosphere—the network of TikTok moms and mommy influencers and mom bloggers—it has been almost universally embraced as a healthy, liberating way for mothers to exhibit their rage.

We aren’t sure what’s happening in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. says that oil is pouring through the Strait, but industry firms that track ships have not verified this. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent becomes the official to watch (more on Bessent) as the U.S. prepares to launch the “greatest financial offensive” against Iran, threatening ship seizures. Cash is tight in Iran, and the U.A.E. has broken off diplomatic relations. An editorial published Sunday by the New York Post counsels: “Trump is winning the Iran war— stay the course.” New York Post cover: “Scared Strait” with a picture of the Supreme Leader.

Radical streamer Hasan Piker isn’t just the leading Mao fan and a popular campaign surrogate on the Democratic left. He can sing too. Unfortunately, Piker thinks it’s cute to sing about the death of Charlie Kirk. More on this. Jonathan Turley writes that Piker’s “evil” attack on Kirk shows that Piker is the “hateful Left’s Pied Piper”:

We have seen protesters on the left around the country mocking the assassination of Charlie Kirk, even reenacting his murder. Hate traffickers like Jennifer Welch have even justified his assassination. It is all shocking and depressing, but none reached the level of Hasan Piker leading a huge crowd in mocking Kirk and his faith. Before he was murdered, Kirk debated Piker and called him a “socialist hypocrite.”

What is shocking is not the utter depravity and cruelty of Piker, but the ecstasy of the crowd in relishing the death of someone with opposing views. It is part of the conditioning in what I have previously called an “age of rage.”

The Washington Examiner hails New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, whose campaign introduced us to the talented Mr. Piker, the “Democratic Party’s shadow presidential nominee.” In “Mao Meets Manhattan,” Wall Street Journal columnist Bill McGurn last week wondered if “dunce caps,” the fashion accessory of the Cultural Revolution, await New York landlords. Meanwhile, Michigan Senate hopeful and Piker protégé Abdul El-Sayed attacks Second Lady Usha Vance, referencing her heritage, and calling her “a racist.”

It’s AOC, of course, rather than Mamdani, who is most commonly bruited about as the possible Democratic nominee. The Wall Street Journal’s Allysia Finley takes note of AOC’s fiscal thinking in “AOC’s Craaazy Economic Theory Lives On.” Finley observes:

Remember modern monetary theory? This was the craaaazy economic view that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez helped popularize during Woke 1. It held that the U.S. needn’t worry about deficits because the government could print money. Politicians could spend with abandon, and if inflation rose, Congress could subdue it by raising taxes.

Stephanie Kelton, an economist who provided the intellectual imprimatur for modern monetary theory, thanked Ms. Ocasio-Cortez for bringing this radical idea into the mainstream: “People immediately probably started googling ‘modern monetary theory’ to find out what she was referring to.” …

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is tiptoeing back from some of her earlier radical social positions, like defunding the police. But she and other progressives continue to promote the woke economic idea that raiding the rich can pay for their wildest spending dreams. What will it take for them to wake up?

Crazy Rich Commies. Sweet that DSA socialist boss Gustavo Gordillo has been able to afford $1.5 million to refurbish the house his parents bought him. Unherd spotlights champagne socialists such as Gordillo. But Unherd admits:

It’s no surprise, then, that many young socialists have neglected the economy, unions, and free healthcare as their organizing principle in favor of, say, the war in Gaza or LGBTQ issues. As the sociologist Vivek Chibber has argued, socialist organizations “have to largely imagine what [working class] interests are”, since they don’t learn through direct engagement.

A movement that has to imagine the working class from the outside will, unsurprisingly, keep producing leaders who look like Gustavo Gordillo or Grace Ryan, who — without a hint of irony — invoke noblesse oblige, the paternalistic fantasy of upper-class gifts bestowed on the grateful poor.

Scary—but somewhat elusive—white supremacists. Ira Stoll writes at the Washington Free Beacon that even though the FBI says there are 7 times as many anti-Jewish as anti-Muslim hate crimes, the New York Times is stoking a panic about Islamophobia.

Young at Heart. “Democrats Are on the Verge of Picking Another 80-Year-Old,” Politico says. He’s Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey. Politico admits that the party “is still traumatized” by the Biden presidency (so am I!) …

But much of the party’s insurgent energy is coming from the left — and that might be what saves Markey.  

“Mr. President, Sometimes Silence Is Golden” is the headline on Frank Miele’s RCP piece. Miele mentions a speechifying occasion:

Every other politician was sticking to talking points, glib and predictable, but Trump was saying whatever came into his head, consequences be damned.

In 2026, that same verbal recklessness is likely to cost Trump a Republican Senate and House and very possibly make it impossible for him to be succeeded by a Republican two years later.

If you are a Democrat, that’s great news. But if you are a Republican, or just someone who was inspired by Trump’s promise to blow up “politics as usual,” it’s demoralizing at best – and terrifying at worst.

But nobody could begrudge President Trump a victory lap at the hugely enjoyable and patriotic IndyCar’s Freedom 250 race here in Washington Sunday.