Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

In 60 Seconds: Voting Rights

*PDF Download: In 60 Seconds – Voting Rights

Every American should have the right to vote without fear of discrimination, and the federal government has an important role to play in enforcing those privileges.

However, federal attempts to protect voter’s rights actually takes the power away from local governments and citizens.

Here’s the issue of Voting Rights in 60 seconds:

General Principles

Voting rights are protected by the U.S. Constitution and by federal statute

  • The 15th Amendment prohibits the denial or abridgement of the right to vote “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude”
  • The Voting Rights Act prohibits discriminatory voting practices and provides strong federal enforcement mechanisms.

Under the U.S. Constitution, American elections are decentralized

  • As a matter of constitutional design, our elections are state-by-state contests that are administered locally.
  • This system provides important checks against corruption and fraud.

Only in extreme circumstances can the federal government intrude on local control of elections

  • The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a unique exception to our decentralized voting system, made necessary by widespread, deliberate disfranchisement of blacks in the Jim Crow South.

The Voting Rights Act (VRA)

The Voting Rights Act of 1965

  • was passed to give blacks access to the ballot, which had been unconstitutionally denied them in parts of the country;
  • empowered the federal government to enforce voting rights nationwide;
  • and gave the feds temporary power to oversee voting changes in jurisdictions with a history of racist election practices.

Specific provisions

  • Section 2 permanently outlaws voting procedures that deny or abridge the vote on account of race or color;
  • Section 5 temporarily requires certain jurisdictions to get federal approval (“pre-clearance”) before making electoral changes;
  • Section 4 establishes criteria for determining which jurisdictions must seek Section 5 pre-clearance.

The way forward

  • The federal government has an important role to play in enforcing voting rights nationwide, but it should not micromanage local election procedures in jurisdictions with no recent history of voting discrimination.

Addressing Misperceptions

In 60 Seconds: ESG

*In 60 Seconds - ESG

Traditionally, the goal of investing is to maximize value for shareholders. ESG is a new form of investing by the Left. It sta...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

In 60 Seconds: Independent Contracting Threats

Independent Contracting Threats

*Independent Contracting Threats (PDF Download)

Today, 60 million Americans—39% of the U.S. workforce—freelance. Workers overwhelmingly choose independent contracting because they can earn more income and enjoy greater flexibility, fulfillment, and work-life balance than if they were employees.

Women value flexibility. Independent contracting is important to stay-at-home mothers, caregivers, retirees, students, and people with disabilities, chronic illnesses, and health conditions that prevent them from working in a traditional job. Independent status is not the last resort; 64% of freelancers are working independently by choice.

Most freelancers are skilled professionals across a wide variety of occupations such as computer programmers, marketing professionals, event planners, optometrists, artists, transcribers, and writers. The sharing economy has also expanded gig opportunities through ridesharing, delivery services, and tasks.

Reclassification Destroys Flexible Opportunities

Congress, federal agencies, and states are pushing for greater restrictions on self-employment. Lawmakers and regulators seek to reclassify tens of millions of independent contractors as employees, even if they prefer their status, through:

  • Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (passed the House in the 117th Congress)
  • Department of Labor’s proposed rule for independent contractors
  • National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) considering changes to its independent contractor status test.

Similar restrictions on independent contractors were enacted in California (AB5) under the guise of protecting workers’ rights. In reality, AB5:

  • Destroyed many flexible work arrangements causing workers to lose their livelihoods.
  • Severely reduced opportunities for state-based critical service providers that serve vulnerable communities (transcription services for the hearing impaired, health aides, etc).
  • Triggered layoffs and closures because businesses could not afford the higher costs. Reclassifying independent workers as employees will raise labor costs for businesses by an estimated 20-30% and cost an estimated $57 billion nationwide

Reclassification takes away worker choice and will lead to lost incomes, closed businesses, and destroyed livelihoods. At a time of high inflation, policymakers should not destroy flexible work in America. Misguided policies to reclassify millions of independent contractors must be rejected.

TEMPLATE: Letter to Personal Investment Banker

*PDF Download: Letter to Personal Investment Banker

Dear PERSONAL INVESTMENT BANKER, 

I appreciate the care and advice you’ve given me over the years to achieve my financial goals. 

I’m writing because I’m concerned about investment banks and funds no longer prioritizing maximizing shareholder value and returns for people like me, and am hoping that you can tell me how you are navigating these issues. 

To be clear: I view the investment strategy based on Environmental, Social, and Governance principles, or ESG, as a betrayal of that fiduciary trust. It puts the interests of other parties ahead of my interests and undermines my ability to achieve financial goals. I do not share the political values that underpin the ESG movement – but that shouldn’t matter.  Investing shouldn’t be politicized.  Nor should I have to worry about my savings being used to advance a political agenda rather than to help me build my nest egg. 

I would appreciate learning how ESG and other political agendas are impacting decisions relating to my account and how you are trying to help safeguard my assets from being invested in non-politicized funds. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely,

TEMPLATE: Letter to Financial Institution about ESG

*PDF Download: Letter to Financial Institutions About ESG

Dear INVESTMENT BANK, 

Investors like me, as well as retirees and pensioners, have typically trusted your investment firm to prioritize maximizing the value of our savings and investments.

The trend of investing based on Environmental, Social, and Governance principles, or ESG, is a betrayal of that fiduciary trust and one that incurs serious financial consequences. It puts the interests of other parties ahead of the interests of shareholders and investors like me. This is undermining the security of my retirement and my ability to achieve other financial goals. 

There is simply no reason for [Name of Investment Firm] to prioritize the wants of left-leaning activists over producing a sound financial return for investors.

I know that ESG investments are not as profitable as advertised. There are many other avenues for [Name of Investment Firm] and its employees to engage in the political process without sacrificing my financial security. Please understand:this is especially concerning as many Americans experience financial hardship stemming from rapid inflation and financial instability. 

I implore you to refrain from engaging with businesses that prioritize ESG investments and rating systems over maximizing shareholder value. There are other financial institutions that I can entrust  my investments with because they are keeping controversial politics out of their financial decisions. If you insist on using your company to make political points and push woke ideology, I’m going to take my business and investments elsewhere.

Sincerely,

How to Talk About: SOCIAL SECURITY EARNED LEAVE

Overview
*PDF Download

Social Security Earned Benefits are a proposed solution to expand access to paid family leave without raising taxes, growin...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login