Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

‘Equity’ at work in Fairfax County, VA

In light of the recent awards scandal afflicting northern Virginia’s high schools, we have to wonder if Fairfax County’s school board and Superintendent Michelle Reid are concerned at all with fulfilling their basic responsibilities to educate our children. Plummeting test scores and so-called equitable grading have forced parents to wake up to the fact that equity fervor eclipsed merit long ago. Even in once revered schools such as the Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ), achievement has given way to leftist ideology.

At a town hall meeting hosted by a Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) “Equity Officer” and the Irving Middle School Principal Cynthia Conley earlier this month, I posed the question: Is FCPS going to admit children to TJ based on merit alone next year, or will their ethnic backgrounds and skin colors be considered as factors in their applications as well?

FCPS Region 4 Equity Officer Michell Cottrell Williams, one of many of the county’s administrators on the equity indoctrination gravy train, was visibly taken aback by my direct question, but didn’t refute its premise. She awkwardly answered, “I, uh, I don’t [uncomfortable laughter], uh, know what any future plans are for changing any of the current TJ admission policies. I know TJ, uh, um, uh, is a big issue right now … uh, that, that many people in the county are aware of.”

Unlike the region’s equity officer, I’m actually aware of how the policy works and how it negatively affects high-achieving students, especially Asian applicants. My family is in the middle of the TJ application process. I was naively optimistic that the pushback Virginia’s education officials have received because of their corrupt withholding of Commended Student awards might force TJ admissions back toward merit, at least a little. But it has not.

In Fall 2022, FCPS notified eighth-grade students of the continued low-bar academic prerequisites for the nation’s top-rated high school. Students need at least a 3.5 GPA, must have completed Algebra 1, and be enrolled in honors English and Science courses. Many applicants have much higher GPAs and will already have completed honors Geometry by the time they enter high school, but that is not relevant to their TJ application under the equity system.

Instead, after students meet the basic requirements, they are assigned a date and location to take their equity essay test. Last year, only one of the five questions was STEM-focused. The others were about overcoming adversity, advocating oneself, achieving goals, and methods for solving problems. Arguably, the best route into TJ under this subjective assessment system after making the cutoff is to seem politically liberal and emphasize victimhood.

Lowering the bar for admittance to our nation’s top-rated school seems bad enough, but the motive is even worse. Multiple conversations in school board meetings and work sessions demonstrate that the FCPS board initially changed the admissions process to engineer the racial composition and decrease the number of Asian-American students at TJ. Their plan worked. In its first year of implementation, Asian student admittance fell by almost 20% from 2020 to 2021. In February 2022, Federal Judge Claude Hilton ruled that TJ admissions policies racially discriminated against Asians.

In September 2022, FCPS appealed Hilton’s decision at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, with counsel from Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP the same law firm that fought to maintain school segregation in Brown v. Board of Education. Hunton seems to have a history of fighting on the wrong side of important matters.

While the Fourth Circuit decides the case, it placed a stay on Judge Hilton’s order, meaning that FCPS is free to use its “ patently unconstitutional ” TJ admissions policy until the verdict is in.

At the FCPS Budget Hearing on Jan. 23, 2023, I asked school board members, “Have you already determined your racial quotas for the incoming class?” No answer, of course.

As a mother to an applicant of Asian descent, I am livid that my son might be rejected from TJ for racist reasons. If not for being the wrong race, they might even reject him for being the son of a woman with the “wrong” political inclinations. He deserves a fair shot, just like every other student and family, regardless of race, background, or income status. That is true equality.

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a mother in Fairfax County, an author, and a member of Independent Women’s Network.

Sage’s Law and School Choice in Virginia with Stephanie Lundquist-Arora

IWN chapter chair Stephanie Lundquist-Arora joins this episode of Escaping Your Government Assigned School to discuss two timely topics: school choice...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

National School Choice Week Celebration In Arlington, VA

Independent Women’s Forum is teaming up with EdReform Virginia to celebrate National School Choice Week and we’re inviting you to join in on the fun! ...

Activate your membership to gain access to IWN content!

Unlock members-only content, resources and events by activating your Free Pass or gain access to additional features by selecting a monthly membership package. Join Now Already a member? Login

A Nation at War: Equity vs. Merit in Public Education

Parents are waking up to find that we’re in the middle of a war of equity versus merit within our nation’s borders. Left-wing radicals have usurped public education, especially school boards, with the goal of indoctrinating our children.

Real skills like tying shoes, writing cursive, typing, and balancing checkbooks have been replaced with exploratory lessons on the importance of demographic identity and intrusive surveys. Teachers follow inappropriate lesson plans and tell white children that they are the oppressors and their black classmates, that they are the oppressed.

Meanwhile, standardized test scores plummet and flags with political messages line classrooms, even in elementary schools.

The objectives of public education have regressed over time from academic achievement to “equal outcomes,” bringing down all boats.

The awards scandal in Fairfax County, Virginia, is just another symptom of the equity cancer plaguing our country. In order to avoid hurting the feelings of the students who didn’t earn prestigious Commended Student Awards in the National Merit Scholarship Program, eight high schools in Fairfax County failed to notify students of their achievement.

This gross negligence will likely cost the recipients scholarships and admissions to colleges, prompting an investigation from Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares.

Sadly, this recent scandal is merely the tip of the iceberg for equity activism.

Across the nation, school districts have eliminated advanced math and implemented “equity grading” systems in order to ensure equal outcomes, to the great detriment of quality education.

Illinois parents were disappointed to learn that administrators at Oak Park and River Forest High School implemented an equity grading system for the 2022-2023 academic school year. In order to increase GPAs, students under this system start their assignments with half-credit and effectively have no due dates.

Ideological proponents of the “equal outcomes” approach to education erect smokescreens. They gaslight critics and claim there’s nothing to see behind the brick and mortar. They deny the integration of critical race theory in the curriculum. They tell us books like Gender Queer are appropriate reads for middle-schoolers.

For them, withholding prestigious awards is accidental or otherwise just fine. That’s because they don’t want conscientious objectors to pursue merit and academic excellence in public education – to fight against them for the future of our nation.

In an interview on January 21, 2023, Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Sears summarizes it best when she says,

They’re playing chess. And apparently, we’ve been playing checkers, but no more.

Stephanie Lundquist-Arora is a mother in Fairfax County, Virginia, an author, and a member of the Independent Women’s Network.

Submit Your Price Transparency Story

The New Hampshire state legislature is considering legislation that would require greater healthcare price transparency so patients can make informed decisions about health care — but legislators need to hear from you!

Tell us about your experience being hit with a surprise medical bill or learning too late that you are paying too much for a procedure.  We will make sure that your story is heard by New Hampshire legislators so they make informed decisions about the future. 

By submitting your story, you agree to our story submission terms

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
Would you be willing to testify (written or in-person) in front of the New Hampshire state legislature?(Required)

Stop Government Bureaucrats From Taking Your Gas Stove

Did you know DC politicians and unelected bureaucrats are trying to ban gas stoves?

It’s true!

In recent years, radical green activists have been able to use powerful federal officials to jam through onerous, job and business-crushing regulations free from the democratic process. This ensures that the public has no say in regulatory decisions that do great harm to the American economy.

That’s precisely what’s occurring today with one much-loved kitchen appliance.

On December 21, 2022, Representative Don Beyer (D-VA) and a coalition of House and Senate Democrats sent a letter to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), which is an independent federal agency charged with reducing the unreasonable risk of injuries and deaths associated with consumer products. This agency can pull a product from the marketplace or issue recalls on products at will.

In the letter, the lawmakers claimed gas stoves exacerbate respiratory conditions and asthma in children. This claim was based on a deeply flawed study produced by a green activist organization laser-focused on undermining the natural gas industry worldwide. Based on this flimsy evidence, the lawmakers asked the CPSC to consider a wide range of regulatory moves to make buying a gas stove more difficult (and likely much more expensive) for consumers.

In response, CPSC member Richard Trumka Jr., said the agency would consider a ban on gas stoves.

It’s time to kick these guys out of our kitchens!

Use the form below to urge members of Congress to stop pushing for a ban or more costly regulations on gas stoves.