Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Move Over, 1968. C’est la Révolution. With Palestinian Flags. Trump & Zelensky Feuding. Obama ‘Appalled’ by Omar Investigation. Elise Slotkin Says Quiet Part Out Loud. The Perils of Resume Inflation. And More

France “reels from unrest,” as a Washington Post headline has it. France is certainly reeling all right, but “unrest” doesn’t begin to capture the magnitude of what’s happening in France. Move over, Paris 1968.

“The French Republic Is Under Attack” proclaims The Free Press. “France’s radical left,” Simone Rodan-Benzaquen argues, “wants its followers to believe they are fighting tyranny. But burning city halls and terrorizing public servants is an assault on democracy, not a defense of it.”

Here is how she begins:

C’est la Révolution, on prend la Bastille!” the protesters shouted as they broke into Marseille’s city hall in France on Saturday. It’s the Revolution. We’re taking the Bastille. Carrying a Palestinian flag, they overturned furniture and knocked a bust of Marianne, the symbol of the French Republic, to the floor. Protesters elsewhere stormed buildings across the country.

By evening, the city hall of Limoges, in west-central France, was burning. Its roof was destroyed; its century-old bell tower collapsed. In Bordeaux, in the southwest, rioters ransacked the official residence of the prefect, the national government’s local representative. More than 2,000 people were arrested; more than 600 police officers were injured. Several hundred shops were damaged across the country, according to the interior minister. By Sunday afternoon, fresh clashes had broken out in Paris.

“If This Isn’t a Civil War, It Certainly Looks Like One” is the Free Press headline over a story by Andrew Hussey, who lives in Paris and has heretofore “insisted that France is not coming apart.” Living close to the massive destruction taking place in Paris, Hussey went to bed Saturday night less convinced.

The Islamic element must not be ignored. “Saturday’s violent desecration of the French Republic was a mob jihad against democracy itself,” argues Brendan O’Neill in a Spiked Online story headlined “How ‘Palestine’ conquered France.” O’Neill writes:

Can everyone just stop it with the ‘school protests’ shit now? Or the drivel about this being a protest over the ‘cost of living’? It should be clear to all that we are watching the violent undoing of the French Republic itself. A great society coming apart at the seams. Tragically, the fuse for this anti-republican savagery was lit by the republic itself – by its leaders’ willful throwing open of France’s borders to half the world, their supine abandonment of the ideals of assimilation, and their suicidal indulgence of the intifada frenzy that swept France in the wake of the Hamas pogrom of 7 October 2023. The mob might be starting the fires, but the elites gave them the matches.

This is why the omnipresence of the Palestine flag matters – it confirms France is being consumed by the flames of anti-Westernism, by a nihilistic disdain for the very virtues of our civilization. For that is what the so-called Palestine cause now embodies – not concern for the Palestinian people but contempt for ‘the West’. Not a desire for a ceasefire in the Middle East but a longing for fire here at home.

A Wall Street Journal editorial headlined “Why France Is Burning” notes that far-left candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon sees an opening in the riots. The editors conclude with a warning:

France is in a violent democratic funk, and it will probably get worse. Don’t think it can’t happen in the U.S. given the current state of American politics.

It’s not just France. There are riots in Belgium, Lisbon, and Milan. The CNN story just linked says that in France “the vast majority of protesters have been peaceful.” In other words, “mostly peaceful” despite the destruction and arson. Asra Nomani, a former Wall Street Journal investigative reporter, has a report on the 54 groups apparently behind the French uprising. This story (“‘They Have to Leave Our Country,’ ‘We Don’t Want a Caliphate’“), which quotes a party leader of right-wing Alternative for Germany, is guaranteed to stir controversy.  

President Trump has waived sanctions and tariffs against Russia, which were put on Russia in accordance with the Lindsey Graham law. A highly critical editorial in the Wall Street Journal is headlined “To Russia with Love, Signed Donald”:

President Trump’s assistance to Vladimir Putin keeps growing by the day, and in the latest example he stuck a shiv in the back of the legacy of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. …

On Sunday Mr. Trump said on social media that he is trying to negotiate a peace deal and doesn’t “want to do anything that will drive, foolishly, Russia away from the bargaining table.” But he’s been courting Mr. Putin this way for two years, to no avail….

Congress is preoccupied with the Nov. 3 election, but Mr. Trump may not appreciate the anger he’s courting if he keeps aiding Mr. Putin. When the election is over there needs to be a bipartisan reckoning for Mr. Trump’s budding alliance with the Kremlin against Ukraine, Europe and American interests.

President Trump is saying that Ukraine’s President Zelensky “never wanted to end the Ukraine war.” The Wall Street Journal reports that Russian President Putting “is floating” an idea of a summit with Trump and Chinese dictator Xi to discuss a Ukraine Deal. Not on the invite list: President Zelensky.

Examiner Chief Political Correspondent Byron York examines the facets of President Trump’s job approval and how it might affect the midterms. Sean Trende cautions, “For the Love of God, Please Don’t Overinterpret Early Voting.” Trende contends that putting too much emphasis on early returns is the “Elvis-in-a-potato-chip” of election analysis.

While Republicans are facing dismal polls, the Democrats are losing the once solidly Dem Jewish vote. “Jews in New York and elsewhere are finally letting go of a party that is increasingly hostile to their interests,” argues Zach Kessel in Free Expression. The stats are impressive. Kessel says the Dems “have only themselves to blame.”

Meanwhile, two Dems have made remarks that I find more revealing than perhaps they realize. Former President Barack Obama has denounced the investigation of Rep. Ilhan Omar as “so appalling.” This is a kind of blatant radicalism that the one-time “deporter-in-chief” kept semi-under wraps. Powerline’s Scott Johnson has a good post about Obama’s entering the fray on Rep. Omar’s behalf.

Getting to Know You Better. And in the second revelation, Democratic Senator Elise Slotkin said the quiet part out loud—if the Dems win the House and Senate, they should prosecute Trump officials so young people will be afraid to join the administration. Miranda Devine writes that, though Slotkin advertises herself as a moderate, “this is how the Bolshevik left plays the game.”

Last week we also got to know Katie Zacharia, President Trump’s ill-fated White House Press Secretary for a few tortured moments. Matthew Hennessey writes about Ms. Zacharia and the risks of resume inflation:

The longer the lying goes on, and the higher you climb in your chosen field, the greater the likelihood that you’ll get caught in your own traps.

The most surprising feature of the midterms is the rise of socialism in the United States. I want to recommend three important articles on this. The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel speaks about the rise of socialism in American politics in Imprimis. Gary Saul Morson reviews Paul Mason’s book “Reds,” a “global history of communism,” at the Washington Free Beacon, and John Ellis wrote a few days ago about how radical professors have “poisoned the electorate” because they have indoctrinated rather than educated.

“Sally Rooney’s Radical Chic,” by Dominic Green, who is always fun to read, debunks the notion that the mopey Irish novelist is a martyr for free speech.

Speaking of mopey, Ms. Must has a rule never to get broody about stories I meant to mention but forgot in my daily rush. But I haven’t been able to shake my feeling that it really was unforgivable that I forgot “The Concept Creep of Nonconsent,” by Christina Bottoms, at City Journal, which is pegged to the Cornell allegations of sexual assault. What happens when someone remembers a sexual incident differently after time has passed? Recommended this morning is Heather Mac Donald’s post on X about the progressive Cornell’s imperative to believe accuser Jane Doe. As Heather urges, enjoy!

Speech of the Year: Rubio at the Acropolis. Smear of the Year: Mamdani Oct. 7. Lomborg: Most Recycling Is a … Waste. Midterm Polls. Plague. Kimberly Guilfoyle. More

We are rarely treated to oratory as magnificent as the speech Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered yesterday at the Acropolis.  

Rubio’s remarks were nothing short of call to the West to “revive itself by recalling its historic virtues and ambition,” according to a Wall Street Journal editorial headlined “Marco Rubio Gets to the Heart of the Matter“:

It’s the speech of the year by our lights. …

Here, in Athens, we found the first full realization of all the essential traits that would come to define the West,” Mr. Rubio said: “fierce individuality and relentless ambition; daring exploration and invention; a yearning for discovery, for adventure, risk and glory. An insatiable curiosity about the world and the principles by which it operates, a hunger to know the mysteries of nature and grasp the secrets of the cosmos.”

He then connected those traits to the West’s achievements. “This was the foundation of the Western mind: our math, our science, our medicine. Our philosophy, ethics, and religion. . . . It was the foundation of the riches of Christian theology—of Augustine and Aquinas, and the whole tradition of natural law.”

It isn’t often these days that you hear a politician speak of “the West,” much less make the essential connection between our own day and our inheritance from Athens and Jerusalem. Would that we heard it more.

The New York Post reprinted Rubio’s remarks under the headline “We Must Fight to Defend Western Civilization.”  Rubio’s Stunning Athens Speech Stops Washington Cold,” trumpets a Washington Examiner headline:

Do secretaries of state with no political ambition give sunset speeches in the most jaw-dropping settings imaginable, stirring the soul to defend civilization?

That’s the question all of Washington is asking itself today.

In a way, it’s unfortunate that the Examiner injected presidential politics into a speech that can be savored for its merits alone.

New York’s Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s oratory yesterday was a different matter. Mamdani chose yesterday, Oct. 7, the third anniversary of the deadliest day in history for Jews since the Holocaust, to post a message described as “rooted in antisemitism and hatred.” He accused Israel of “ongoing genocide” (how many times must this be debunked?).

The Free Press’ Eli Lake writes that in his October 7 smear, Mamdani “showed his true colors.” A New York Post editorial says that Mamdani “chose to play Hamas’ spokesman on Oct. 7 anniversary.” A Wall Street Journal editorial (“Celebrating Hamas on Oct. 7”) noted the “basic dishonesty” of Mamdani’s words. 

Even so, it wasn’t enough: Mamdani was “booed and berated” at an evening anti-Israel gathering. Meanwhile, a Free Expression story on Mamdani’s “fake battle against antisemitism” notices that a Mamdani plan “funnels money to organizations that preach hatred of Jews.”

Alert to all beleaguered recyclers. “Most Recycling Is a Waste,” the latest Wall Street Journal op-ed by Bjorn Lomborg, is an eye-opener. Lomborg acknowledges that “metals and some plastics are worth separating, but the rest of it is costly and can hurt the environment.” Lomborg explains:

Almost anything can be recycled if you throw enough money and energy at it. But are the benefits worth the cost?…

Yet governments have increasingly pushed citizens to recycle paper, glass and plastics worth less than the cost of collecting and processing them. Sometimes the environmental benefits made up the difference. But over time the means became the end.

A new study from Denmark’s Environmental Protection Agency shows the trade-off. Mechanical post-sorting of household trash nationwide would lift Denmark’s recycling rate by almost 5 percentage points toward EU requirements. By the usual scoreboard, that is a win.

But the costs far exceed the benefits. Each ton of carbon dioxide avoided would cost nearly €4,000. That’s almost 50 times the European carbon price, meaning emissions can be cut far more cheaply elsewhere….

Recycle what is worth recycling. Then throw away the idea that more recycling is always better.

Ms. Must is certain that Massachusetts’ Democratic Governor Maura Healey is an avid recycler. But she does seem to have had one change of heart. Healey now “pleads for more natural gas, quick. What changed her mind?” is the tease on a Wall Street Journal editorial headlined “Climate Reality Hits Massachusetts.”

“Republicans Pray for a Polling Failure” is the headline on Karl Rove’s politics column. Rove thinks that campaigns are reaching the lock-in point. Rove writes:

What about the polls? Republicans believe they are biased in favor of Democrats. One of the best GOP polling minds, Patrick Ruffini, examined this question, studying 3,312 polls from the last four elections. He found 73% of these overstated Democratic performance compared with the actual results….

If this pattern holds this year, then virtually every battleground Senate race is within the margin of error today, exaggerating the current strength of Democratic candidates. Some who look today like possible winners will lose if the pattern holds. Still, how this plays out is up in the air. “Each cycle has the potential to behave differently,” Mr. Ruffini acknowledges. Maybe this is that cycle. Or maybe not….

It’s nail-biting time for everyone, especially Republicans.

Barton Swaim astonishingly suggests that South Carolina could go blue and reiterates his view that there were better options for the GOP than Senator Darlene Graham: “Democrat Annie Andrews is showing up. Darline Graham is nowhere to be found.” Speaker Mike Johnson, meanwhile, has raised a whopping $156 million for the House GOP.

“Military ordered to be ready for possible Iran strikes as Trump weighs timing,” is an Axios headline. According to Axios, U.S. and Israeli sources say it could happen before the U.S. midterm elections and possibly the Israeli elections a week earlier. Oil prices are jumping and the Dow futures are sliding on Middle East worries.

“Here Comes the Plague Again.” No, not the headline we want to be reading. “Maybe SARS-CoV-2 was just a warm-up for Yersinia pestis,” suggests Matthew Hennessey. Yikes. But there would be differences:

At least there are no bats in this story. If people start dropping dead from plague we’ll know for sure it came from the Irkutsk Research Anti-Plague Institute. It’s a relief to think we won’t have to play the blame game this time around….

It wouldn’t take much to send society back to the edge. You know it’s true….

The only difference between this time will be the number of people willing to fight. Many—maybe most—are in no mood to get fooled again. Maybe this time it’s no foolin’. What if SARS-CoV-2 was just a warmup for Yersinia pestis? Things will get ugly fast.

“’Honey Please’: Kimberly Guilfoyle Pushed Donor to Wire $100,000 to Her Amex Account” is the attention-grabbing headline on the Wall Street Journal’s explosive story on the U.S. Ambassador to Greece. It’s a shocker:

For months, Guilfoyle had been chatting with Eric Deters, a former congressional candidate in Kentucky who was seeking her help in getting the attention of the new Trump administration on some personal tax and legal issues—and had promised payments of as much as $1 million if she was successful.

As Donald Trump Jr.’s former fiancée, Guilfoyle offered to use her sway, according to Deters and messages reviewed by the Journal. She forwarded Deters the messages she’d sent to the new Internal Revenue Service chief and updated him on her efforts to lobby the Justice Department on his behalf. 

But her confirmation was coming up, and she needed her card balance paid down before then, she said.

“Honey please I need you to get this done for me today,” she texted Deters, adding a prayer hands emoji and a PDF with bill payment instructions from American Express. “You could just send it here,” she wrote on July 3, 2025, just days before her July 9 confirmation hearing. 

Deters didn’t ultimately make the payment, telling Guilfoyle it would cost him his marriage….

Readers with a long memory will recall that Guilfoyle was formerly married to Gavin Newsom.

In other news, newly revealed FBI documents reveal that now White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles was heavily monitored in a probe launched by former FBI head Christopher Wray and Biden AG Merrick Garland. … And a Minnesota man named Sheikhdoon Abdullahi Mohamud was arrested yesterday in connection with his alleged plans for a terrorist attack on the Mall of America. Quiz: Which of the two FBI probes better served the public?

Oct. 7 Brings Out the Monsters. Green Party Embraces Antisemitism. The French Love to Riot. This Time It’s Different. Cornell & the Sexual Revolution. York on Senate Races. More

On the third anniversary of October 7, the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, “SOULLESS” anti-Israel protestors plan to march on the streets of New York in support of Hamas terrorists.

New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin responds to the celebrations planned in honor of the atrocities of Oct. 7:

Groups calling themselves “anti-Zionists” say they will mark the event with rallies in Gotham and many other cities around the world.

In effect, they aim to turn Oct. 7 into an international day of joyful celebration of the butchers who carried out the initial attack, and hail their ultimate cause of eliminating the Jewish state.

“Glory to the martyrs, victory to the resistance,” say some flyers for the rallies. Some display a figure wearing a keffiyeh and an upside-down triangle, a symbol often used to signify Hamas.

Goodwin rightly calls these remorseless supporters of horror, inhumanity and savagery “monsters.”

Meanwhile, “The Israelis Who Never Left October 7 Behind” at The Free Press observes: “Three years after October 7, survivors and their families are still learning how to live with what happened.” Polina Fradkin writes:

Lihi shouted [her brother] Bar’s name, thinking he’d fallen asleep there—it was a place he regularly visited—but he didn’t answer. He had shot himself in the heart. He was 30.

“I think about the day I found him a lot,” Lihi told me. “Finding the person you know and love, a person who is so happy. . . and you’re calling his name and he’s not answering.”

“We couldn’t even cry,” she said. “We were too shocked.”

The Free Press publishes an exclusive excerpt from the new memoir of Avinatan Or, kidnapped from the Nova music festival on October 7, and subsequently held hostage in the tunnels under Gaza for 738 days. “Avinatan’s attention to detail in captivity was extraordinary; his will to live, even more so,” the editors write.

Eli Lake writes that we’re “still drowning in myths about the Gaza War,” while Brendan O’Neill of Spiked Online calls Gaza “the most liked about war in history.” Spiked also notes the U.K.’s Green Party’s embrace of antisemitism. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair writes at TFP that “Britain’s fastest-growing party has a Jewish problem.” “If you care about the future of the UK and the future of the Holy Land: Pay attention,” urges Sir Tony. What should be done with the site of the kibbutzim Hamas attacked three years ago?

The French are still rioting. A Wall Street Journal editorial refers to “France’s Bonfire of Inanities.” The problem in a nutshell: “Leftists riot in defense of a welfare state the country can no longer afford.” The editors write:

It’s easy to scoff at French rioting as its national pastime, but what’s unfolding now is different. France is approaching its most serious crisis in decades, and the disorder in the streets may be only the start.

Ostensibly the destructive rioting of the past few days is a student protest against underfunded schools. If you believe that, we have a pont over the Seine to sell you. The riots have been encouraged by politicians on the left, as Dominic Green recently reported on the Journal’s Free Expression newsletter….

The violence obscures the related crisis engulfing public finances. France doesn’t have more money to spend on schools because it doesn’t have more money to spend on anything….

France’s main problem isn’t math. It’s slow growth. The right fiscal reforms, such as tax cuts and welfare and pension reforms that encourage work and investment, would create new opportunities for prosperity. Young people would be the biggest beneficiaries. The alternative is what’s happening in the streets.

Americans can’t afford to gloat from the sidelines. U.S. debt is 100% of GDP, and its politicians can be as feckless as the French. At least the U.S. economy is growing at a healthy clip, but that could change in a hurry with the wrong mix of regulation and a ham-handed attempt to tax our way out of our fiscal hole.

The Muslim element of the French riots cannot be ignored. Brendan O’Neill calls the riots an intifada in the heart of Europe. Matt Vespa’s take: “‘From the River to the Sea’ Isn’t So Fun When It’s the Seine to the Mediterranean, Huh?“

Cornell University President Michael Kotlikoff is in the hot seat as a result of the Cornell rape allegations. Kotlikoff is now talking about “body autonomy.” Ira Stoll of the Free Beacon argues that Kotlikoff is “missing the point—in a telling way”:

It’s an illuminating message nonetheless as Kotlikoff, or his speechwriters, struggle for language to explain to themselves and the community why the events alleged by Jane Doe are wrong. The word “wrong” doesn’t appear in the statement. Maybe he doesn’t want to prejudge what happened, but given that the university already conducted a Title IX investigation and expelled two students, it seems a little late on that. It’s hard to draw moral judgment without any framework of shared moral values.

In “How the Sexual Revolution Led to Cornell,” Emma Camp of Free Expression poses an argument: “The rebels of 1968 sought ‘freedom’ from traditional attitudes. But the trade-off may be the occasional shocking failure of modern sexual culture.” A snippet:

For this is what we ask of the young people at a frat party in the post-1968 world. Both the boys and the girls are encouraged to have sex, including with strangers, including while inebriated. The only rule is that everyone must consent at all times, which sounds simple enough.

But, for a young man, this simple rule demands fine-tuned social judgment. His libido urges him to seek out as much sex as possible, as do his frat brothers, and the young male mind is addled when he is part of a pack. He must seek out certain proof of consent from young women whose signals he can’t reliably read. Is this woman he’s never met before too drunk, or just drunk enough? Does that body language indicate a “no,” even if she hasn’t said as much?

Will the Senate flip? Byron York writes that it is likely to do so, starting with the Dems taking North Carolina. Here are the Washington Examiner’s high points of the debate featuring Maine’s moderate GOP Senator Susan Collins and progressive challenger Troy Jackson. Former President Barack Obama is on the campaign trail, most notably for Senate hopeful Abdul E-Sayed. Powerline’s John Hinderaker doesn’t mince words:

The fact that Obama is willing to campaign with the radioactive El-Sayed illustrates the fact that there is no division between moderate Democrats and far-left Democrats. They are all far-left. The only division in the Democratic Party is between those who think that their constituencies are far enough left that they can come out as socialists–Communists by the ballot–and those who think that the American people are not yet “ready” for socialism/Communism, so progress toward that goal should be more gradual.

We are informed that Christa Pike, the death row inmate who survived a botched execution, is “conscious and speaking” after the ordeal. Charles Fain Lehman helpfully recalls Pike’s victim and the obscenely horrible manner in which she died. Don’t Miss. “Preparing to Fire“: The Wall Street Journal this morning publishes fascinating transcripts of audio recordings of months of warnings, confusion, and attacks in the blockade on Iranian oil exports. Iran is increasing attacks on ships, but the flow of oil and gas is also increasing. Welcome news: “Reports about taking out Los Angeles and San Diego are greatly exaggerated.”

The Good Guys Made Sloppy Mistakes. Anthropic Courts Religious Leaders to Sell Bizarre Fantasies. Is Higher Education Moving South? Justice Alito on Covid and Our Rights. More

In fighting terrorism, the good guys have to be right every time.

“Multiple Security Failures Allowed FlyDubai Pilot into Cockpit” is a Wall Street Journal headline. It reveals just how many times the good guys got it wrong—and several times purely because of sloppiness:

Before Hamam al-Hammami stood behind his captain on FlyDubai Flight 1073 and raised an emergency ax to begin the assault that nearly brought down the plane, there had been ample opportunity for authorities in three countries to keep him from getting anywhere near that cockpit. 

Oman had scrutinized his online habits and decided he showed too much interest in radical ideology to trust as a pilot at state carrier Oman Air, where he worked. They banned him from flying, sent him to a deradicalization program and put him in a desk job but didn’t flag their concerns more broadly, people familiar with the matter said.

When FlyDubai hired him in February, it didn’t contact Oman to vet his experience.

The last chance to stop him before the airport came in Israel. It was a low bar—pilots from countries like Oman that don’t have diplomatic relations are barred from flying to the country, so Hammami should have been stopped outright. 

Danielle Pletka takes a look at how the New York Times covered the attempted hijacking—or “altercation in the cockpit” in Times speak and concludes that the mainstream media is irredeemable.

In other news of the not-so-friendly skies, the U.S. military evacuated a dozen B-1 bombers from the RAF Fairford airbase in the UK, with a U.S. official telling Axios that the base is under threat of attack from Iran. Several dual British-Iranian citizens arrested last week are suspected of planning an attack on Fairford.

The flydubai stabbing—in which Iranian influence is suspected-and Fairford suggest that Iran might be switching its tactics to covert and deniable attacks:

The two suspected attacks are raising questions over whether Iran’s war strategy is shifting, but experts caution not to treat the incidents as equally indicative of Iranian involvement — or evidence yet that Tehran has changed its tactics.

Could New York Governor Kathy Hochul have acted in a more provocative fashion when she named New York AG Tish James to investigate the Cornell rape allegations? “Letitia James Appointed Special Council Despite Declaring Guilt of the Accused” is Johanthan Turley’s headline. This is a case that demands a meticulous and objective special counsel, not a partisan activist. But Hochul picked James. Turley doesn’t mince words:

Hochul’s appointment of James maximizes the chances of a criminal charge in the case. James has always followed the policy of the Queen of Hearts in “Alice in Wonderland”: “Sentence first, verdict afterward.”

The stunning moment in the Hochul-James presser was when James dismissively declined to comment on a Facebook post prematurely condemning the frat guys—it was her own post. A lawyer for a student has asked James to step down, considering such prior comments. Don’t count on it. Hochul is urged to call a special Albany assembly to tighten rape laws. Meanwhile, Sasha Stone has a fascinating article on what she calls the “consent trap.”

Hedge fund billionaire Ken Griffin’s $3 billion donation to start a new campus of Carnegie Mellon in Florida is a loss for New York (whose Mayor all but personally chased Griffin out of town). But Griffin’s Carnegie Mellon bet could pay off big for higher education and the growing Miami region:

Higher education is facing a series of market distortions. Public confidence in America’s universities remains low across the political spectrum. For many years, there’s been an apparent mismatch between what parents and students want and what America’s top universities have offered. Even setting aside the culture-war battles of the last decade, many students and parents seem to doubt the value of higher education, a sentiment that the disruptions of artificial intelligence could easily intensify.

But these market distortions might also create the kinds of opportunities Griffin’s donation could help Carnegie Mellon seize. Vanderbilt University, which is also establishing a campus in the Miami region, provides one case study….

Does AI model Claude have feelings? Does Claude suffer? No, but “Anthropic’s idiot savants are trying to play God while pushing frightening utopian fantasies,” Miranda Devine writes: 

The artificial intelligence company Anthropic has been busy for months wining and dining religious leaders and influencers to try to push their self-serving agenda and utopian fantasies. 

The Vatican’s response has been to pour cold water on bizarre claims that Anthropic is embarking on its own “creation story” to give birth to new sentient beings in the form of computer software.

Billionaire co-founder Chris Olah, a 34-year-old Canadian-born evangelical who has turned his back on Christianity, thinks their AI model, Claude, has feelings and a sort of moral consciousness. He’s worried about its “mental health” and believes it experiences human emotions like love and “suffers perpetually,” The New York Times reported. 

Devine mentions Pope Leo XIV’s Magnifica Humanitas encyclical on AI, which rejects the bizarre notion of machine consciousness. Devine suggests that a real threat to humanity might be Anthropic’s staff composed of “utopians who believe they are uniquely equipped to save humanity thanks to their superior intelligence and extreme wealth.” See also: Anthropic vs. the Pope.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s new book—“So Ordered: An Originalist’s View of the Constitution, the Court and Our Country”—out tomorrow. Adam J. White reviews it for the Washington Free Beacon. Alito was interviewed by Fox Sunday news host Shannon Bream yesterday. She asked the Justice about draconian Covid restrictions:

I think it was a stress test of our constitutional rights.

In other words, it put our loyalty to those constitutional rights, our dedication to those constitutional rights to the test. And one of the things that, unfortunately, it disclosed was that many people were willing to downgrade certain constitutional rights, the right to freedom of speech and the right to the free exercise of religion in particular.

They were willing to make those secondary to other things. The example of the casinos, I thought, was telling. And what I said in the speech was nothing more than what I had said in a written opinion. The governor of Nevada at that time said, the casinos are open. Come back to Las Vegas.

And so people came back to Las Vegas, and there were pictures of people in the casinos. And they were not wearing masks. Not all of them were wearing masks. They certainly were not maintaining a certain degree of separation among themselves. That was all predictable.

But, at the same time, the state had a very severe limit on the number of people who would — could attend a house of worship, no matter how big that house of worship was. A similar thing happened in New York City.

And always the sound of the midterms hurrying near. “Four ways the midterm elections could go, one month away,” by Isaac Arnsdorf at The Washington Post says Dems have polls and history on their side; Republicans have money. The Brazilian race was a shocker. Conservative Flávio Bolsonaro, son of imprisoned former President, surged to first place and will be in the Oct. 25 primary.

Two More Things. Here’s how a City Journal piece on the National Book Foundation begins:

“A good coat of paint can hide a multitude of sins,” a time-tested adage maintains. Unless that paint happens to be white—then, according to Columbia University writing professor Wendy Walters, it might have “figured into systems of erasure, exclusion, violence, and the masking of power in the social and natural world.” Walters is so exercised by white paint, for which she professes “a genuine and visceral dislike,” that she has written a 352-page book, A Dead White: An Argument Against White Paint, to be published on October 13.

Lest you think Walters’s book is just another indulgence of American academia’s bizarre notion of scholarship, the five judges enlisted by the National Book Foundation have picked A Dead White as one of ten longlisted titles for this year’s National Book Award for Nonfiction.

Joel Klein couples ed union boss Randi Weingarten and 1619’s Nikole Hannah-Jones as two women who have made public education worse in an excellent WSJ op-ed.

Moral for Terrorists: Don’t Mess with Zionists. Christa Pike’s Botched Execution. Cornell Retreads: Me Too and Tish James. Porn and Sexual Assault. Hopeful in Hormuz. More

What is the takeaway from the thwarting of what might have been Israel’s September 11?  

“The lesson of Flydubai? Don’t mess with Zionists.” That’s the Spiked Online headline for Brendan O’Neill, who was at the Tel Aviv airport as news of the attempted terror incident broke. O’Neill writes about the passengers who fought back:

This was a revolt worthy of the history books. A people’s fightback against the violent narcissism of either a suicidal freak or a murderous Jew-hater (or possibly both). This man may have craved death, and possibly loved it, but he came up against a swarm of people who far prefer life. That’s the civilisational divide distilled: worshippers of death vs lovers of life. There is something profoundly moving about the clip in which the passengers chant ‘Am Yisrael Chai’ as the plane safely lands. ‘The people of Israel live’ – in a time of untrammeled Jew hate, it’s the most defiant, life-giving cry you can make. It fortifies the hearts of those of us who love civilisation, and breaks the spirit of civilisation’s enemies.

There was humility with the bravery. …

UK foreign secretary Ed Miliband said he was ‘deeply concerned about the incident’, which was only stopped by ‘the actions of those on board’. Oh Ed, would it kill you to say something nice about Israelis?

You might also like The Washington Free Beacon’s “’A Nation Like a Lion’—Israeli Airline Passenger Heroics Avert Jihadist Terrorist Attack.” The near catastrophe exposed a gaping hole in Dubai’s airport security. Meanwhile, “Flydubai Terrorist Identified as Radical Muslim with Bizarre Practice in Front of Women.”

The New York Post gave convicted murderer Christa Pike, who survived a botched execution in Tennessee, the full tab treatment on this morning’s cover: “Die Another Day.” Pike is in critical condition with her prognosis unknown. Predictably, the accident has triggered calls to end the death penalty.

In “Am I Lying to Myself About the Death Penalty?” Charles C. W. Cooke, who (unlike Ms. Must) had not previously supported the death penalty, has a counterintuitive reaction to the failed execution—he now wonders if the death penalty is right:

The truth is that I think that Pike should be dead, and I am not at all upset that Tennessee tried to kill her. I wish it had succeeded, and I feel no qualms about this. I have read what she was convicted of — what she confessed to — which was this:

Later that night, Pike went to Iloilo’s room and told Iloilo that she had just killed Slemmer and that she had brought back a piece of the victim’s skull as a souvenir. Pike showed Iloilo the piece of skull and told her that she had cut the victim’s throat six times, beaten her, and thrown asphalt at the victim’s head. Pike told Iloilo that the victim had begged “them” to stop cutting and beating her, but Pike ….

Melanie MacDonogh writes in the London Spectator that Pike should be allowed to live. At this point, Ms. Must doesn’t disagree. The authorities indulged Pike’s wish for an all-female execution team. What kind of statement was this supposed to be? Isn’t the last meal of favorite dishes sufficient? Babylon Bee has the best take.

“Cornell brings back #MeToo” is a headline in the London Spectator. That’s not the only unwelcome returnee. New York Governor Kathy Hochul has appointed state AG Letitia James to take over the investigation of the Cornell allegations.

Does pornography help explain the Cornell assault? “Where else would young guys get the idea that women want group sex with strange men?” asks Emma Camp of Free Expression. Camp makes a good case:

In the middle of it all, I’m left wondering how this could have happened in the first place. Sexual entitlement and drug-loosened inhibitions are for sure part of the story. But there’s another likely factor that’s so far gone unmentioned in public discussion of the case: pornography.

It’s unfashionable to ask if endemic pornography use among young men contributes to some sex crimes. It’s a sign of moralist hysteria—akin to thinking videogames cause school shootings or heavy metal is turning the kids into Satan worshipers. Porn is presumed harmless, and anyone who suggests otherwise is consigned to whatever cultural trash heap Tipper Gore and the Church Lady now reside in. …

Watch enough porn, and you’ll think it’s perfectly normal for a woman to want group sex with strange men. Watch enough porn, and you’ll think it’s perfectly normal to strike a woman while you’re having sex with her.

Republican voters are panicking at the prospect of a blue wave, even as the President Donald Trump receives two plaudits from the Wall Street Journal editorial pages. The first is “Trump Has the Right Instincts on AI.” Trump knows the risks if China is left to dominate AI. The second is “The Battle of Hormuz Is Turning“:

Did you notice the sudden media realization that the oil export pressure is now working against Iran? New reports from tanker-tracking groups confirm what the Trump Administration has been saying: Adm. Brad Cooper and the forces of U.S. Central Command have turned around the battle of the Strait of Hormuz.

Data from Kpler indicate that the seven-day average for oil clearing the Strait is 14.19 million barrels a day, approaching the prewar baseline of 17.13 million. Most of what’s missing are Iranian oil exports stopped by the U.S. blockade. The recent resumption of oil flowing through the Saudi bypass pipeline, followed by accelerating loadings at the port of Yanbu to transit the Red Sea, will unlock more exports….

This is what progress looks like: Iran’s oil is blocked while the world’s oil increasingly gets through. The effect is to reduce pressure on the West and its Gulf allies while Iran must scrounge for money. The regime is rapidly running out of oil already on the sea from before or between blockades, though payments will have a longer lag. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent estimates the Iranians will deliver the last of this oil to China in mid-October.

Even The American Conservative (TAC)—steadfast opponent of the Iran war—sees “glimmers of hope in Hormuz” but with tons of caveats.

Annals of Not Free Speech. “I Questioned Transgender Ideology. Now I’m Facing Prison in France,” by Dora Moutot at The Free Press. The 411:

I went on television to debate what makes a woman a woman. Four years later, I have a criminal conviction and face new charges that could put me in prison.

Fox has a follow-up to Ms. Rachel, who has built a sprawling media empire contributing to radical causes. This is not free speech; it is indoctrinating small children behind their parents’ backs.

This Just In: President Trump reveals a possible change in what we must tell IRS that might help prevent illegal immigration. Usual suspects are apoplectic.

The Company He Keeps. Zohran Mamdani is being honored by a group that apparently has close ties with Iran. City Journal has the scoop:

But critics have long questioned NIAC’s relationship with Tehran. In a 2020 letter, Senators Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, and Mike Braun called on then-Attorney General William Barr to launch a Justice Department investigation against NIAC and NIAC Action (its sister organization) for possible violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, identifying a pattern of what they called “troubling behavior.”

The senators pointed to a 2019 internal memo in which NIAC blamed the United States for an Iranian militia’s attack on a military base that killed an American civilian contractor and wounded several others. Kata’ib Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militia that carried out the attack, later stormed a U.S. embassy in Baghdad. The senators also highlighted tweets from NIAC and NIAC Action staffers pushing “conspiracy theories deflecting blame from the Iranian regime for shooting down a Ukrainian civilian airliner, killing 176 individuals.” (NIAC called the accusations “slanderous.”)

Religion News. Scientists are claiming to have discovered Noah’s Ark. The Duchess of Sussex is marketing a new chocolate-filled Advent calendar for a mere 112 pounds. Perfect. As ever, Ms. Must.

Heroes Foil Hijacking. Israeli Plumber One of the Valiant. Legacy of Flight 93 Hailed. U.S. Economy Takes Off. But Is It Too Late for Midterms? Miranda Devine on Cornell 7. And More

We’re going to hear the word hero a lot today.

And thank heavens for the “Heroes in the Sky,” who foiled the attempted hijacking of a Dubai airplane en route from Dubai to Tel Aviv, saving the lives of 174 passengers.     

This, from Jonathan Sacerdoti of the London Spectator:

The heroes who saved the flydubai flight from disaster a flydubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv appears to have been hijacked by its own co-pilot. It ended with the plane on the ground in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, and all 174 passengers alive, among them 27 children and many Israelis. Very little has been officially confirmed. But what we do know points to a potentially massive disaster that was averted, thanks to the bravery of Israeli passengers and members of the crew. …

If the early indications are right, this morning a pilot tried to turn a passenger jet into a weapon on a route that stands for that new relationship. He was stopped by ordinary passengers who ran toward the danger instead of away from it, and by a crew who happened to be in the right place at the right time. We came very close to a very different headline today.

The grievously wounded captain managed to open the cockpit so passengers could swarm in and subdue the treacherous co-pilot. The Wall Street Journal reports on the cockpit stabbing and terrifying nosedive. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu credits an Israeli plumber for “preventing another 9/11.” Passengers further recalled the plane’s drastic, stomach-churning plunge. The Free Press profiles one of the heroes in “‘I Ran Toward the Cockpit’: An Exclusive Interview with the Israeli Dad Who Stopped a Hijacking.” An editorial in the Wall Street Journal ties this to the legacy of the “spirit” of Flight 93 25 years ago in September 11:

The threat from Islamic terrorism isn’t over. But on their way home to Israel at last, survivors of the hijacking could be seen on video breaking into an old Jewish song: “The whole entire world is a very narrow bridge / and the main thing—is to have no fear at all.”

Don’t miss “The Hero Who Stopped Israel’s 9/11” in the U.K. Telegraph.

“The U.S. Economy Is Accelerating” is the headline on a Wall Street Journal editorial. The editors write:

You’d be forgiven for thinking the U.S. is slouching toward recession based on the gloomy headlines. But cheer up—the Commerce Department on Wednesday made an unusually large upward revision in its economic growth estimate for the first half of the year. Might rising yields on the 10-year Treasury reflect accelerating economic growth? …

The larger story here is that the economy as a whole looks to be on a stronger footing than during the Biden years when growth was driven by government handouts. Recall how the Biden team boasted that its climate spending was increasing construction and even defended its endless student loan forbearance as propping up consumer spending.

Mark Skousen writes that gross output signals an economic surge. In his Best-of-the-Web column, James Freeman observes that the U.S. economy is better than was previously reported. I know what you’re thinking. Does any of this help Republicans, or are the midterm results already baked into the pie? Victor Davis Hanson had a piece recently about what he called the “false gloom” about the economy that defeated George H.W. Bush and elected Bill Clinton.

Karl Rove’s column this morning does not radiate hope for the GOP’s electoral prospects. Headlined “A Blundering 2026 Midterm Campaign,” the column suggests that the Republican campaign strategy looks good on paper but suffers from subpar execution:

Messaging is one of the few areas of Team Trump’s execution we can judge in real time. The past month it’s been awful.

Especially given Mr. Trump’s poor approval numbers, he has to drive home each day what the GOP has accomplished and will accomplish—and clearly contrast that with what Democrats believe and promise. Instead, we’ve gotten off-putting confusion.

“How many House seats will the Democrats win? The polls may already know,” is Henry Olsen’s Washington Post headline. Olsen writes:

This week, I set about reverse engineering the past three midterms using generic congressional ballot polling. I expected the analysis to be fruitful, but even I was surprised by just how predictive it turned out to be. Applying the same model to the election before us renders this verdict: a Democratic majority of at least 225 seats and as many as 232.

So many commentators are off and running. We should wait for more information in the complicated case of the Cornell rape accusations. “The lynch mob is out for the ‘Cornell 7’ — proving we’ve learned nothing from past injustices,” Miranda Devine cautions. She writes:

The “Cornell 7” gang rape case is descending into the same lynch-mob hysteria as the notorious Duke lacrosse or “mattress girl” hoaxes of old — only with social media making ­everything worse. 

It seems we have learned nothing from past injustices. 

A young woman who goes by “Jane Doe” has filed a civil lawsuit two years after she alleged she was gang-raped by seven men in a sordid, drug-fueled sexual encounter at the Chi Phi fraternity house at the elite Cornell University, where she was a student at the time. 

Predictably, the fraternity brothers have been judged guilty in the court of man-hating public opinion. 

Yet, according to Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten, citing Doe’s sworn statement to campus investigators in November 2024, she “described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious and consensual.” When she told the young men to stop, they did. 

In “The Moral Wilderness of the Cornell Seven Case,” National Review’s Dan McLaughlin writes:

Moral panics are not always bad. Sometimes, they represent an overdue societal correction against some entrenched injustice. But they are always dangerous, and we should always have a clear head about the fact that we are in one. So it is with the “Cornell Seven” case. …

“Jane Doe,” the thus-far anonymous alleged victim, now says that she was raped on October 19–20, 2024, by seven members of the same fraternity at Cornell, where she was a 20-year-old junior. The central issue in every rape case has to be this one: Did he do it? The surrounding facts may show aggravating or mitigating factors; they may or may not tell us bad things about the victim or other possible accomplices or bystanders. But the essential question has to come first: Did he rape her? If so, he’s a violent criminal and should be treated by the law and society like any other predatory felon. If not, we’re not dealing with a rape.

Of course, a non-rape can still be many sorts of morally dreadful behavior, but it doesn’t become rape just by the application of hot rhetoric. Sadly, after decades of assaults by progressives and feminists on traditional moral frameworks and rules, we don’t really have a coherent language to deal with immoral sexual behavior that doesn’t cross the line into crime. We’d be in a better place if we had those sorts of standards. It’s hard to teach your sons, or your daughters for that matter, moral rules if you treat the whole idea of moral rules with contempt.

Dangerous Women. Moms for Liberty co-founder Tina Descovich is warning parents about the radical content of Ms. Rachel’s kiddie shows. “Not Mr. Rogers,” says Descovich. … The “‘Palestinian Rachel Dolezal’ Scandal Isn’t What You Think.” Take her and what she represents seriously, says City Journal.