Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Hillary & Co: Illusionists. Why Were Important Documents in an FBI Burn Bag? Sickos Rejoice in One Massacre Victim’s Death. Palestine Chic & More

Even fully paid-up members of the let sleeping dogs lie club must sit up and take notice.

When respected George Washington University law professor and Fox Contributor Jonathan Turley writes a column like this, you know Russia collusion-gate has legs. Here’s Turley’s headline:

Democrats pulled the greatest political con job ever on Americans. It’s finally unraveling

Turley writes:

This week, Washington was rocked by new releases in the declassification of material related to the origins of the Russian investigation. The material shows further evidence of a secret plan by the Clinton campaign to use the FBI and media to spread a false claim that Donald Trump was a Russian asset. With this material, the public is finally seeing how officials and reporters set into motion what may be the greatest hoax ever perpetrated in American politics. 

What is emerging in these documents is a political illusion carefully constructed by government officials and a willing media. The brilliance of the trick was getting reporters to buy into the illusion; to own it like members of an audience called to the stage by an illusionist.

Similarly sober-minded is Douglas Murray, who argues that “it’s important to get answers to Hillary’s RussiaGate plot.” The latest cache of documents to be declassified were the “annex” to the Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation. You’ll never guess where they apparently were:

Alas, the day is here: the annex to the Durham report, the investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion hoax that former Attorney General William Barr initiated, has been declassified and released. It was discovered in the FBI burn bags by Director Kash Patel.

It wasn’t just this file—thousands of documents related to the Russian interference investigation that the Obama DOJ, or lack thereof, conducted. The annex is clear about a few things, some of which you’ve already read about from Katie. 

The annex material is two things: extremely juicy and deeply troubling. Shawn Fleetwood of The Federalist examines Soros executive, who predicted that the FBI would “put more oil into the fire” to help the hoax along. The Federalist’s Margot Cleveland says the legacy media hasn’t woken up to the Russia hoax but the public has. Meanwhile, investigative reporter John Solomon says the annex is the “smoking gun.”

The Democrats have been “rending their garments and screaming their hatred for Donald Trump” since before 2016, but it’s not working says Liberal Patriot Ruy Teixeira. Teixeira advises them too “give up on #Resistance 2.0.” Teixeira writes:

In short, voters get that Democrats hate Trump; they’ve already priced that in. Endlessly reminding voters of that fact and how Trump must be #Resisted! does nothing to change Democrats’ fundamental problem: voters neither like nor trust them and therefore do not find them an obvious choice over their opponents.

Not everybody got the memo, as a frail old man who emerged from somewhere to deliver an incoherent address last night obviously didn’t. Also unemployed, Kamala Harris was on Stephen Colbert (ditto employment status) last night, where she peddled her new book—“107 Days”—you should go on Amazon just to read the summary–hilarious.       

The New York Post cover this morning is the sea of blue at the funeral of hero NYPD Officer Didarul Islam, who was murdered in the Midtown Manhattan rampage. “The Most New York Story There Is” is the headline, a reference to the fallen Officer as the son of both New York and Bangladesh.  Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch delivered an emotional eulogy.

“She Was Murdered in Midtown. The Internet Celebrated It” is The Free Press headline on a story about another casualty of the Midtown murders (I prefer “casualty to victim;”they fell in a war against civilization), Wesley LePatner. The TFP subhead:

Wesley LePatner was a mother, a wife, and a beloved boss. But to a growing number of people, she was a symbol of everything they hate.

Ms. LePatner was an executive at Blackstone, known as a mentor to young women.

The New York Post has published a disturbing picture of the face of Holly, the woman brutally beaten in the viral Cincinnati beatdown:

The woman viciously pummeled in a viral Cincinnati brawl has returned home to Russia — as relatives of one of the attackers claim the brutal beatdown is only drawing national outrage because the victim is white, according to reports.

The female victim — identified as Holly by a US senator from Ohio — was left with a gruesome black eye, busted lip, and bruises covering her face and neck after being knocked out during the horrifying melee that erupted in the city’s downtown early Saturday, shocking footage and photos showed.

Holly is also a casualty in a war against civilization.

A Cincinnati City Counsel member, you might recall, gloated that Holly and other casualties deserved the beatings because of their race. Victor Davis Hanson writes about the “the Cincinnati copouts.” Hanson cites four oddities in the attacks:

Three, there was neither a police presence nor any timely Good Samaritan interventions.

Instead, what ended the attacks was simply the fact that at least two of the targets appeared nearly comatose. So their assailants apparently concluded that their agenda of beating whites into unconsciousness was mostly complete.

Four, oddly few of the usual black spokespeople who habitually comment on interracial violence were to be seen.

Fox viewers will know about the Cincinnati brawl, but the three major broadcast networks did not cover it.

And now for some non-violent, good news.

Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberley Strassel writes this morning “The Rise of the Climate Right.” The headline is a big misleading. You imagine RINOs protesting in favor of stringent net zero regulations. But that’s not what it is:

Something important happened this week, if the fuming response is anything to go by. The country is witnessing the rise—finally—of a scientifically armed and debate-ready climate right. The “consensus” gatekeepers don’t like it one bit.

The Energy Department issued a report whose title might glaze eyes: “A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate.” The New York Times, foaming with indignation, rolled out every shame word to denounce the report’s authors as “skeptics” who “misrepresent” and “cherry-pick” as they “undermine” and “attack” the “consensus.” This fury was at striking odds with the smug “we’ve won” tone of recent climate journalism.

First Democrats said President Trump would crash the economy and when that didn’t happen, they said the Trump economy is a mirage, according to a column by Examiner Chief Political Correspondent Byron York. Byron writes:

First of all, there’s no doubt that an annual GDP growth of 3.0% is a good report. But, just as the first quarter figure was low because of tariff-related increased imports, so the second quarter figure was high because of tariff-related decreased imports. So you can mentally take a little off the top. But remember that, even taking into account a drop in imports, the prediction for second quarter GDP was 2.3% — and then it came in at 3.0%. So it is good news. 

And it is not a mirage. And it is not crashing the economy. Obviously, Democrats want to diminish President Trump’s accomplishments in any way they can. That includes talking down the economy. But when they say the president is crashing the economy, or that economic growth is a mirage, they only make themselves look less credible.

President Trump unleashed new tariffs yesterday and that and the new jobs report brought the market futures down early this morning. The Canada deal is in jeopardy because Canada backs a Palestinian State.  You know what a Palestinian State is (to go back to a Byronic word)? A mirage. It doesn’t currently exist.

Canada is not the only country given to fantasy. “Diplomatic Terrorism?: France’s Recognition of an Imaginary Palestinian State” is a Gatestone headline. You can read the definition of a state.  A Jerusalem Post editorial asks, “Why Is Europe Rewarding Hamas Terror with a Palestinian State?”

And closing with some good, clean fun—Don’t miss Jeffrey Blehar’s delightful “Jasmine Crockett, Genuine Counterfeit.”

Tsunami Hits West Coast. Sick: Trolls Go After Victim of Midtown Massacre. NYT Admits Photo of Gaza Child Was Fake News & More

After a massive earthquake in Russia’s eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, tsunami waves began pounding the U.S.’s West Coast early this morning.

Hawaii has downgraded the tsunami but urges citizens to stay alert. People in the Pacific Northwest, however, are facing life-threatening waves:

The waves, measuring at 3.6 feet, slammed into the Northern California coastline near the small enclave of Crescent City and Humboldt Bay, the National Weather Service Eureka announced.

The entire US West Coast had been under a tsunami advisory for hours after the world’s largest earthquake in 14 years struck 8.2 miles southeast of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia at around 7:24 p.m. ET….

Large parts of Russia, China, Japan, Guam, Canada, Mexico and Central and South America were all under tsunami warnings or advisories after the quake.

We will keep those affected by the tsunami in our thoughts and prayers.

The New York Times reports on the four innocent and outstanding victims murdered in yesterday’s shooting spree in midtown Manhattan. One victim was Blackstone executive Wesley LePatner; trolls are already making sick Luigi Mangione-inspired memes out of his death. A news story in the Wall Street Journal takes us inside 345 Park Avenue, the office building under attack, as frantic employees set up barricades. There were some lucky escapes.

The lobbying for more gun control began just as quickly as the memes. “Even New York’s Strict Gun Control Laws Couldn’t Prevent the Midtown Shooting,” is the headline on a New York Times story. But the shooter, Shane Tamura, obtained his concealed carry permit in Nevada, you say. That’s the trouble, the New York Times contends: piecemeal gun laws across the country. Tamura was obviously nuts and had had previous known bouts with mental instability. How about we strictly enforce the gun laws on the books before we go for a national gun control law?  (Tamura had made the gun himself.)

Mayoral aspirant Zohran Mamdani responded to the shooting spree long distance from his Ugandan Shangri-La. New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin found Mamdani’s response consisted of “shallow platitudes:”

Sensible New Yorkers didn’t need yet another reason to vote against Zohran Mamdani for mayor, but Monday’s horrific Midtown slaughter provided a clear illustration of why the radical Democrat must not win the keys to City Hall.

Not only is Mamdani on record as ardently supporting defunding the police but he lacks the seasoning, Goodwin writes, of Mayor Eric Adams and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who were on the spot:

Meanwhile, Mamdani is a rich-kid socialist whose wealthy parents made it possible for him to avoid work and try to become a rap artist.

Indeed, he seems never to have held an actual job before winning election to the Assembly four years ago, which should never be confused with full-time work.

One of the few things he’s done is steep himself in the toxic brew of NYPD hatred.

And yet … a stunning poll reveals that Mamdani’s rivals for Mayor of New York have little chance, even if they team up.

Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley has something to say about policing in his column this morning. It is headlined “Violent Crime Is in Decline. Why?” Riley argues that protests and passive policing during Covid, not illegal immigration, were the major factors:

The rise in crime that the U.S. experienced during Covid began before the pandemic. Laws had been passed that decriminalized lawbreaking. Progressive policies had been enacted that made it more difficult to prosecute offenders and keep violent suspects off the streets.

What Democrats have taken away from this experience is an open question. On the one hand, cities like Baltimore and San Francisco now have mayors and district attorneys who take crime control seriously. On the other hand, Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate to be the next mayor of New York, is a socialist who once tweeted that the New York City Police Department “is racist, anti-queer and a major threat to public safety.”

If Mr. Mamdani wins, his police detail might want him to elaborate on that sentiment.

Threatened City: New York City remains a target of single-actor terror, according to City Journal’s Nicole Gelinas.

Don’t Everybody Answer at Once: “Why are Democrats so darned unpopular?” asks novelist and political commentator Mark Halprin. Halpin’s piece at The Liberal Patriot is so interesting that it’s hard to decide which point to tempt you with, so you’ll just have to read the whole thing.  

Mr. Halpin has been a busy bee. He has a piece headlined “Trump Blinders in His Fight with Harvard” in the Wall Street Journal. Halprin argues that universities need reform but are likely to believe they can weather the current storm.

“Why Is Trump Winning His Fight with the Institutions?” is the headline on Matthew Continetti’s Free Press column. “The ultimate cause of the progressive implosion isn’t external force. It’s internal rot,” Continetti argues. In the same outlet, Joe Nocera wonders if the Fed will be the next institution to fall.

Chief Political Correspondent Byron York has a good piece headlined “For Now the Big Fight Is Democratic Anger vs. Trump Achievements.” Byron addresses the Dem mania for the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. They don’t even have to trap President Trump in anything wrong—they simply have to drag out the Epstein matter for mileage. (Speaking of Dem anger, Spartacus Has Pitched Another Hissy Fit. But at least this one didn’t take 25 hours.)

Everybody suddenly wants to hear from Epstein’s procurer of underage girls. Ghislaine Maxwell is doing 20 years for her role in the Epstein horror, and she wants a deal to tell what she knows. Tina Brown, formerly Queen of Glitzy Journalism, has remarkable insights into Maxwell. Here is Ms. Brown’s lead sentence:

The reason why Ghislaine has never spilled what she knows before is that she has always pretended she doesn’t know anything. …

Maxwell probably won’t get liberated, but National Review hails EPA administrator Lee Zeldin as the liberator of American industry:

In March, we cheered the news that Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin planned to “reconsider” the Obama EPA’s 2009 “Endangerment Finding.” That finding allowed the EPA to regulate fossil fuel emissions under the Clean Air Act. On Tuesday, Zeldin announced that the EPA intends to rescind the finding, a step he described as “the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States.” This strikes a major blow against intrusive regulation of the energy, automotive, and manufacturing sectors.

The New York Times has “stunningly” admitted the truth about the picture of an emaciated child it used to illustrate starvation in Gaza:

The New York Times appended a story it published last week containing a shocking image of a child purportedly suffering from starvation in Gaza with an editor’s note Tuesday.

The note informs readers that Mohammed Zakaria al Mutawaq — the Gazan boy “diagnosed with severe malnutrition” and pictured in the article — also suffers from “pre-existing health problems.” 

“We recently ran a story about Gaza’s most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, who is about 18 months old and suffers from severe malnutrition,” a spokesperson for the outlet said in a statement.  

The New York Times admission may have been prompted by readers who noticed the unfortunate child’s mother did not look underfed.

Alex Berenson comments “urgently” on the New York Times’ Gaza coverage:

But the vaguely worded correction does not explain a far more serious problem. As part of the article, the paper ran a huge photo that seems to show the boy is dying of malnutrition — but excluded his brother, who is clearly of normal weight.

The Atlantic profile of Rep. Jasmine Crockett (“A Democrat for the Trump Era”) is behind the paywall. But tidbits have leaked out, including that Crockett tried to shut down the profile when the reporter began interviewing her colleagues. The Federalist’s Ed Scarry says the mouthy Ms. Crockett isn’t really a new kind of Dem. His headline:

The Democrat Party Has Always Been As Foul As Jasmine Crockett

Good News from the Same ish of the Atlantic: “Why Marriage Survives,” by Brad Wilcox. (You can read this one.)