Come Together to Inspire, Interact, Influence, and Impact.

x
Notifications
Log Out? Are you sure you want to log out?
Log Out

Supreme Court Makes Trump’s Day. ‘Killer Quotes’ from Justice Alito. Iran Droning On? New York Times on ‘Maga Pregnancies.’ Usha Vance Has Last Word. Royals Flee Buckingham Palace. More

Good day for President Trump at the Supreme Court yesterday as two important immigration cases were decided. The left not unexpectedly erupted in fury. “White supremacy!” they shouted.

Considerably more measured is the Wall Street Journal’s editorial headlined “Trump, Refugees and the Supreme Court:”

The Supreme Court on Thursday expanded President Trump’s power over immigration—or so the press proclaims. The White House no doubt wishes that were true, but the six conservative Justices merely ruled that judges can’t usurp power that Congress delegated to the President.

At issue in Mullin v. Doe was Mr. Trump’s termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syrian and Haitian refugees. A 1990 law lets the Secretary of Homeland Security provide quasi-legal status to migrants if they can’t safely return to their home countries because of armed conflicts, natural disasters, or other “extraordinary and temporary conditions.”

The three liberal Justices claimed racism motivates the Trump administration. Most immediately affected are TPS immigrants from Haiti and Syria. The other immigration ruling, also 6-3, concerned asylum seekers:

The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the Trump administration to turn away asylum seekers at the southern border who haven’t yet crossed into U.S. territory.

Why it matters: The Court’s decision resolves a years-long legal fight over a Border Patrol practice when there’s limited bandwidth to process people at a port of entry.

National Review called the rulings “a clean sweep for Trump and written immigration laws.” The asylum case hinges on the meaning of the word “arrived” is. By way of elucidation, Justice Samuel Alito, author of both majority opinions, penned these immortal words:

This case presents a straightforward question: whether an alien who seeks to enter the United States from Mexico “arrives in the United States” when he or she is still in Mexico. . . . In ordinary speech, no one would say that a person “arrives in” a place — for example, a house, a city, or a country — before the person enters that place.

A person arrives in a geographic location only when he enters it. . . . Everyday examples confirm that understanding.

In another ruling, the high Court “drove a stake through Hawaii’s ‘Vampire rule’” and delivered a big win for the Second Amendment. WSJ columnist Kimberley Strassel writes that the “restoration of the Second Amendment” began with Justice Clarence Thomas’ “constitutional firepower.”

Don’t miss “Alito Gets Snippy with Sotomayor” and “Killer Quotes” from Alito’s take down of Hawaii’s illegal gun control law. The Court also handed down a 7-2 majority ruling to halt the mass tort attempt to evade federal law on regulating a Monsanto pesticide.

Iran attacked a ship moving through the Strait of Hormuz but traffic continues to flow and oil prices to decline. It was a drone attack on a Singapore flagged ship. Meanwhile, Iranian dissidents are warning the Trump administration against handing regime a ‘victory it could never win on the battlefield’ in peace talks.

Brace yourself for Acting AG Todd Blanche’s confirmation hearing. The LA Times’ Jackie Calmes compares Blanche to the rather notorious Roy Cohn, a former Trump lawyer, whom Calmes describes as “no holds barred and reptilian.” Former AG William Barr, however, advocates the confirmation of Blanche:

He is well-qualified and will run the department as well as anyone could under President Trump.

It is well known that the MSM goes after conservative women. The New York Times narrows the attack to pregnant conservative women in a piece headlined “The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image.”  Julia Cassidy of Townhall writes:

Amidst their tireless pursuit of conspiring against conservative women, The New York Times published an entire piece titled “The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image,” which spent pages droning on about “the power of the pregnancy aesthetic” and how the “MAGA women” (Karoline Leavitt, Usha Vance, and Katie Miller) embody MAGA’s “idealized image of womanhood.”

With a focus on Usha Vance’s recent podcast, Storytime with the Second Lady, the article comments on her form-fitting dress, noting, “She is wearing a stretchy coral dress that hugs her stomach, making what she is talking about very clear.” The comment came after quoting Usha telling her husband, Vice President JD Vance, that he would soon have a new baby to read to. 

Ms. Vance was undaunted, tweeting:

Now that we know the political significance of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can’t wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks! In the meantime, enjoy my pregnancy fashion (or lack thereof) and a good story with your kids on Storytime with the Second Lady.

First, They Came for … Kathy Hochul. Yes, New York’s Mamdani endorsing governor. DSA takes aim at Hochul over taxing the rich after red sweep, report says: ‘We’re coming for her’. Meanwhile, Dem Rep. Elise Slotkin responds to the socialist sweep in New York, saying her party “needs new leadership” because the “old models are no longer working.”

But Eddie Scarry of The Federalist argues that Dems aren’t afraid of the commies they are electing but hate losing their jobs.  No doubt ubiquitous Rep. Ro Khanna qualifies as a new model. Good piece on “The Meaning of Ro Khanna” at City Journal:

The California congressman embodies the uneasy place of Indian Americans in progressive racial politics.

Socialism on March. New York City’s Board has approved Mayor Mamdani’s rent freeze for two years. Quite a scene.

Not everything can be new. “The ‘Four I’s’ That Can Wreck Presidencies” is the headline on Matthew Continetti’s column at the Wall Street Journal’s Free Expression section. “Inflation, Iran, Israel and ineptitude sank Carter, doomed Biden and now threaten Trump,” Continetti argues. He writes further:

Mr. Trump’s fate now depends on Iranian caprice. And not only his fate. As part of the deal, Mr. Trump agreed to constrain Israel’s defense against Hezbollah in Lebanon. He’s gone from treating the Islamic Republic as an enemy, which it is, to dealing with it as a partner. He’s gone from treating Israel as an ironclad ally, which it ought to be, to disciplining it like a nuisance. Just as the economy went from asset to hindrance, Iran and Israel have swapped places.

Summertime. “At this point, the Reflecting Pool deserves an Emmy” a Washington Post s “Style” piece proposes. The author makes a good case for this:

The best show on television or any other screen right now is Reflecting Pool.

If you turn on Fox News, you can watch White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announce that six arrests have been made of individuals who allegedly vandalized Reflecting Pool. If you go to CBS’s social media, you can watch reporter Ed O’Keefe tell President Donald Trump that, actually, there is no evidence of vandals causing a 250-foot gash in Reflecting Pool. The next day, on YouTube, you can watch Trump stand under an umbrella and explain to reporters that, in fact, it’s a 350-foot slit — 100 feet longer than he’d originally claimed — “in the form of lots of little slits” and also, “it’s a shame.”

We Anglophiles are disappointed with this latest desecration. Seems the British royal family will no longer inhabit Buckingham Palace:

The King and Queen will never live at Buckingham Palace, it has been announced, confirming the first change to the monarch’s official residence in almost 200 years.

Clarence House will serve as the King and Queen’s official London residence, while the Palace, currently undergoing a £369m refurbishment, will remain the administrative headquarters of the British Royal family.

Snopes might enjoy His Majesty’s tax returns.

Tsunami Hits West Coast. Sick: Trolls Go After Victim of Midtown Massacre. NYT Admits Photo of Gaza Child Was Fake News & More

After a massive earthquake in Russia’s eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, tsunami waves began pounding the U.S.’s West Coast early this morning.

Hawaii has downgraded the tsunami but urges citizens to stay alert. People in the Pacific Northwest, however, are facing life-threatening waves:

The waves, measuring at 3.6 feet, slammed into the Northern California coastline near the small enclave of Crescent City and Humboldt Bay, the National Weather Service Eureka announced.

The entire US West Coast had been under a tsunami advisory for hours after the world’s largest earthquake in 14 years struck 8.2 miles southeast of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia at around 7:24 p.m. ET….

Large parts of Russia, China, Japan, Guam, Canada, Mexico and Central and South America were all under tsunami warnings or advisories after the quake.

We will keep those affected by the tsunami in our thoughts and prayers.

The New York Times reports on the four innocent and outstanding victims murdered in yesterday’s shooting spree in midtown Manhattan. One victim was Blackstone executive Wesley LePatner; trolls are already making sick Luigi Mangione-inspired memes out of his death. A news story in the Wall Street Journal takes us inside 345 Park Avenue, the office building under attack, as frantic employees set up barricades. There were some lucky escapes.

The lobbying for more gun control began just as quickly as the memes. “Even New York’s Strict Gun Control Laws Couldn’t Prevent the Midtown Shooting,” is the headline on a New York Times story. But the shooter, Shane Tamura, obtained his concealed carry permit in Nevada, you say. That’s the trouble, the New York Times contends: piecemeal gun laws across the country. Tamura was obviously nuts and had had previous known bouts with mental instability. How about we strictly enforce the gun laws on the books before we go for a national gun control law?  (Tamura had made the gun himself.)

Mayoral aspirant Zohran Mamdani responded to the shooting spree long distance from his Ugandan Shangri-La. New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin found Mamdani’s response consisted of “shallow platitudes:”

Sensible New Yorkers didn’t need yet another reason to vote against Zohran Mamdani for mayor, but Monday’s horrific Midtown slaughter provided a clear illustration of why the radical Democrat must not win the keys to City Hall.

Not only is Mamdani on record as ardently supporting defunding the police but he lacks the seasoning, Goodwin writes, of Mayor Eric Adams and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who were on the spot:

Meanwhile, Mamdani is a rich-kid socialist whose wealthy parents made it possible for him to avoid work and try to become a rap artist.

Indeed, he seems never to have held an actual job before winning election to the Assembly four years ago, which should never be confused with full-time work.

One of the few things he’s done is steep himself in the toxic brew of NYPD hatred.

And yet … a stunning poll reveals that Mamdani’s rivals for Mayor of New York have little chance, even if they team up.

Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley has something to say about policing in his column this morning. It is headlined “Violent Crime Is in Decline. Why?” Riley argues that protests and passive policing during Covid, not illegal immigration, were the major factors:

The rise in crime that the U.S. experienced during Covid began before the pandemic. Laws had been passed that decriminalized lawbreaking. Progressive policies had been enacted that made it more difficult to prosecute offenders and keep violent suspects off the streets.

What Democrats have taken away from this experience is an open question. On the one hand, cities like Baltimore and San Francisco now have mayors and district attorneys who take crime control seriously. On the other hand, Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate to be the next mayor of New York, is a socialist who once tweeted that the New York City Police Department “is racist, anti-queer and a major threat to public safety.”

If Mr. Mamdani wins, his police detail might want him to elaborate on that sentiment.

Threatened City: New York City remains a target of single-actor terror, according to City Journal’s Nicole Gelinas.

Don’t Everybody Answer at Once: “Why are Democrats so darned unpopular?” asks novelist and political commentator Mark Halprin. Halpin’s piece at The Liberal Patriot is so interesting that it’s hard to decide which point to tempt you with, so you’ll just have to read the whole thing.  

Mr. Halpin has been a busy bee. He has a piece headlined “Trump Blinders in His Fight with Harvard” in the Wall Street Journal. Halprin argues that universities need reform but are likely to believe they can weather the current storm.

“Why Is Trump Winning His Fight with the Institutions?” is the headline on Matthew Continetti’s Free Press column. “The ultimate cause of the progressive implosion isn’t external force. It’s internal rot,” Continetti argues. In the same outlet, Joe Nocera wonders if the Fed will be the next institution to fall.

Chief Political Correspondent Byron York has a good piece headlined “For Now the Big Fight Is Democratic Anger vs. Trump Achievements.” Byron addresses the Dem mania for the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. They don’t even have to trap President Trump in anything wrong—they simply have to drag out the Epstein matter for mileage. (Speaking of Dem anger, Spartacus Has Pitched Another Hissy Fit. But at least this one didn’t take 25 hours.)

Everybody suddenly wants to hear from Epstein’s procurer of underage girls. Ghislaine Maxwell is doing 20 years for her role in the Epstein horror, and she wants a deal to tell what she knows. Tina Brown, formerly Queen of Glitzy Journalism, has remarkable insights into Maxwell. Here is Ms. Brown’s lead sentence:

The reason why Ghislaine has never spilled what she knows before is that she has always pretended she doesn’t know anything. …

Maxwell probably won’t get liberated, but National Review hails EPA administrator Lee Zeldin as the liberator of American industry:

In March, we cheered the news that Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin planned to “reconsider” the Obama EPA’s 2009 “Endangerment Finding.” That finding allowed the EPA to regulate fossil fuel emissions under the Clean Air Act. On Tuesday, Zeldin announced that the EPA intends to rescind the finding, a step he described as “the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States.” This strikes a major blow against intrusive regulation of the energy, automotive, and manufacturing sectors.

The New York Times has “stunningly” admitted the truth about the picture of an emaciated child it used to illustrate starvation in Gaza:

The New York Times appended a story it published last week containing a shocking image of a child purportedly suffering from starvation in Gaza with an editor’s note Tuesday.

The note informs readers that Mohammed Zakaria al Mutawaq — the Gazan boy “diagnosed with severe malnutrition” and pictured in the article — also suffers from “pre-existing health problems.” 

“We recently ran a story about Gaza’s most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, who is about 18 months old and suffers from severe malnutrition,” a spokesperson for the outlet said in a statement.  

The New York Times admission may have been prompted by readers who noticed the unfortunate child’s mother did not look underfed.

Alex Berenson comments “urgently” on the New York Times’ Gaza coverage:

But the vaguely worded correction does not explain a far more serious problem. As part of the article, the paper ran a huge photo that seems to show the boy is dying of malnutrition — but excluded his brother, who is clearly of normal weight.

The Atlantic profile of Rep. Jasmine Crockett (“A Democrat for the Trump Era”) is behind the paywall. But tidbits have leaked out, including that Crockett tried to shut down the profile when the reporter began interviewing her colleagues. The Federalist’s Ed Scarry says the mouthy Ms. Crockett isn’t really a new kind of Dem. His headline:

The Democrat Party Has Always Been As Foul As Jasmine Crockett

Good News from the Same ish of the Atlantic: “Why Marriage Survives,” by Brad Wilcox. (You can read this one.)